Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-14-2011, 02:18 PM   #51 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
ok, question
got the new tires put on Monday, and while its only been a couple of days, Im wondering now if Falken ZE912's could be considered an LRR tire design ?
since putting the new tires on, my avg has gone up close to 2mpg on the same route and habits I take on a daily basis.
previously, my avg was 29-30 to take my wife to work and come home after (10 mile round trip). now my avg has been hovering around 31-32, same route, same time of day and using the same driving habits Ive been using these past few months.
I have a hard time believing just going with a 205 vs the 215's that were on my car before would have this much affect ?
or is it a combination of things ?

__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-14-2011, 02:34 PM   #52 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
Hi Mike
Are you using the same miles as before. You are loosing about 60 mm per revolution or adding some distance registered to the odometer. It could be half of the 6% that you are noticing.
__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 06:17 PM   #53 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
same exact distance and everything.
it certainly surprised me, thats for certain.

of course, I wont know if there is any actual increase until I get a couple tanks in, considering my SC might be out of calibration. although someone did tell me how to recalibrate it yesterday, so that will be something I do at my next fill up, and Ill keep my fingers crossed that the numbers Im currently seeing at legit
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-14-2011, 11:06 PM   #54 (permalink)
Depends on the Day
 
RH77's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Kansas City Area
Posts: 1,761

Teggy - '98 Acura Integra LS
Sports Cars
90 day: 32.74 mpg (US)

IMA - '10 Honda Insight EX
Team Honda
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)

Tessie - '06 Acura TSX Base
90 day: 28.2 mpg (US)
Thanks: 31
Thanked 41 Times in 35 Posts
Brainstorming and Advice:

As a general rule, humidity is good, and heat is bad -- the Weather dictates much of that day's FE result. Some vehicles (rare) like warmer intake temps to dial-down fuel-consumption but most have a sweet spot. Test it out.

Look at oil weights and maybe look into going lighter for those shorter trips.

I can only speak of personal experience and those of what I have learned here:
- It takes time
- Experiment
- Make it Fun
- Look at others' Garage entries for mod ideas

For the long term effort, perhaps setup an SFL meetup. Talking about EcoModding and Driving, in person, works wonders for morale and learning. Ride with a pro driving your own vehicle. Lots of us have met with trusted members and came away with good ideas and camaraderie for the cause.

Last thing -- instant feedback is good, but it's like losing weight. Checking it everyday can be disheartening. Look at longer blocks if frustration weighs on you. Nearly all of us here have been exactly where you are now. It does matter.

Best FE,

RH77
__________________
“If we knew what we were doing, it wouldn't be called research” ― Albert Einstein

_
_
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to RH77 For This Useful Post:
d0sitmatr (09-15-2011)
Old 09-15-2011, 11:17 PM   #55 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
ok, as a theory, this has been swimming around in my head for a couple days now (this is just a hypothesis):
when I changed tires, I went with 205's all around vs the previous sizes (215 front, 225 rear) due to the rims, the tires are "stretched"
my theory is that the stretching is allowing a more aero face to the oncoming draft, and could possibly allow the wind to completely bypass the rim interior section.
(diagram
\__/

another thought
has anyone tried using motorcycle tires ?
I recently saw a set of 4 trailer rims in a size 17x4, which would be a perfect size for several motorcycle tires Ive used in the past.
granted, I know the cornering would take a hit, even though MC tires are designed for high performance, their structure is also built for leaned cornering. but if you had a vehicle designated strictly as a hwy vehicle...
I got the seed of the idea from an old post I read on here about how skinny tires used to be.
what do you think ?
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 04:23 AM   #56 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 669 Times in 411 Posts
Stretched tires, good. Motorcycle tires, bad. I really don't think you want to mess around with bike tires on a car. I'm guessing the contact patch will not be right if you don't lean the tire. If nothing else, find some 145's and throw them on a set of space saver wheels.
__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 04:44 AM   #57 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Agreed - I wouldn't run MC tyres on a car. Tyre size is a compromise though and you wouldn't be able to carry as much speed into bends with something as narrow as a 145 - maybe not as important on a highway vehicle ? I have 155s on a much smaller car (think Metro sized) and know where the limit is - a lot lower than the 205s on my previous TDi.

What pressures are you running the 205s ? I recall from your early post you had a couple quite low which may have caused some of your lower FE numbers in your OP. I run my 155s at 45-50 (max is 55 and from the stealer they were at 35) and that made an immediately noticeable difference in coasting. If you haven't already then go higher. Eventually you may find the ride is more 'crashy' on rougher surfaces at which point you can gradually ease back to where it is OK for you but firmer than before.

I did this on the TDI for 20K miles and didn't see any adverse wear either.

Good luck.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 05:30 AM   #58 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
and motorcycle tires have a worse crr than car tires. if anything, motorcycles benefit from running car tires, at least on the back where the handling difference isn't so noticeable.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 08:23 AM   #59 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
good points.
I was thinking more along the lines of the physical shape and how the wind would split around the MC tire vs the flatter car tire. but I do understand what all of you are saying.

Arrogonis, all tires are pressured at 36PSi as I havent had a chance to air them up yet. but when I can, I plan on putting them up to 40psi.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
Old 09-16-2011, 10:35 AM   #60 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by d0sitmatr View Post
has anyone tried using motorcycle tires ?
They normally can't handle that much weight.
They wear out fast - even on a motorcycle.
The rounded design concentrates wear in the center - they'd be gone very quickly when mounted on a car.

__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com