Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-10-2008, 09:29 AM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Quote:
Guys, it's mostly Ford and Honda that spec 0/5W-20 oils ... and I don't think they redesigned a single engine with this thinner oil in mind. All the engines that call for it are older designs with the same clearances as when they called for 5W-30 (like Dad's Mercury Grand Marquis with its 4.6L V8).
Let us assume you are correct. Why then were these engines specd with 10w-30 to begin with if the bearing clearances are unchanged? I can tell you why the spec was changed to 5w-30: To improve fleet fuel economy to meet govt. standards. As long as the engine outlasts the warranty, it is not the manufacturers problem.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-11-2008, 10:45 PM   #12 (permalink)
Recycling Nazi
 
Bror Jace's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: People's Republic of Albany
Posts: 234

Blue Bullet - '06 Honda Civic Sedan LX
90 day: 35.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Arrow

If fuel economy is your aim, I wouldn't run a high-mileage motor oil in your engine as they are formulated to be a tad thicker than other oils in the same grade. They lack the API "starburst" energy-saving symbol on the bottle for a reason.

ttoyoda, I'm not sure they all were? The 4.6L was originally spec'd to use 10W-30? That may be ... but my Dad has had a few of these and all I can remember was buying 5W-30 for his ... until the switch to 5W-20.

It could be that 10W-30 was the "in" oil at the time the engine hit the market. Most engines were spec'd for 10W-40 several years before 10W-30 and 5W-30 is still the most common weight. I'm not sure the auto companies agonized over these recommendations. The oil worked well enough ... and the EPA was pleased to see thinner and thinner oils being used to improve economy among the non-thinking mob of North American motorists.

(Most of us that read UOAs have seen 10W-30 shear down almost as fast as 5W-30 nowadays)

When 5W-20s first hit the market, they were LOADED with extra barrier anti-wear additives like boron and moly. Many still are. So, having the best additive package may have contributed to excellent UOAs ... despite the fact the engines were designed during the 5/10W-30 era.
__________________
--- Bror Jace
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 12:22 AM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
ttoyoda's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: boston ma
Posts: 381
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
I should add, to be exact, that 5w-30 oil is allowed in my 1992 toyota motors when the air temperature is BELOW 50 F. I do 5-30 from december to march usually. A long time ago, I forgot to change to 10-30 in one of my cars, but was reminded to do so because when the weather got hot, the motor was much noiser, it had a nasty sort of clatter. Putting 10-30 in made it quiet again.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 01:12 AM   #14 (permalink)
Pokémoderator
 
cfg83's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864

1999 Saturn SW2 - '99 Saturn SW2 Wagon
Team Saturn
90 day: 40.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
Bror Jace -

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bror Jace View Post
Guys, it's mostly Ford and Honda that spec 0/5W-20 oils ... and I don't think they redesigned a single engine with this thinner oil in mind. All the engines that call for it are older designs with the same clearances as when they called for 5W-30 (like Dad's Mercury Grand Marquis with its 4.6L V8).

I've seen dozens of UOAs (Lab tests) using 5W-20 and they usually look superb. I'd use 0/5W-20 without much reservation. Just don't go over 5,000 miles without doing a UOA from a place like this:

http://www.blackstone-labs.com/gas_engines.html
I just did that test and my car came out squeaky clean. I am running a heavier 10W40 oil, though, because I am at 155K+ miles (Saturn S-Series like to burn oil). I may go back to 5W30 in my next oil change, and check the dipstick a little more often.

Just to oil the waters a bit more, here is another great website on engine oil :

Bob Is The Oil Guy (BITOG)
http://www.bobistheoilguy.com/

CarloSW2
__________________

What's your EPA MPG? Go Here and find out!
American Solar Energy Society
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 01:42 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 303

Pushrod - '02 Chevrolet Cavalier
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 4 Posts
Quote:
I know that the "Zetec 2.0" in the focus is the same as the Mazda 2.0 and I believe they haven't changed that engine since the early 90's.
Pfft, typical Ford!

FWIW, I've switched over two Chevy four bangers to full synthetic after running an engine flush. One engine I switched at 70Kmi, the other at 88Kmi. Both engines are still in service today with zero ill effects. I would also advise you to stay away from high mileage formulas.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2008, 10:41 AM   #16 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Woodland Hills, California USA
Posts: 7

Blu - '08 Subaru Outback Limited
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I back up synthetic.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Effect of gear oil viscosity on transmission efficiency (Metro owners take note) MetroMPG EcoModding Central 44 12-09-2014 12:22 AM
Kill switch for 88-95 Honda Civic/CRX/DelSol AndrewJ DIY / How-to 40 06-18-2012 04:13 AM
Pick Your Poison - Whose gas to buy? SVOboy General Efficiency Discussion 84 11-22-2010 11:19 PM
Alberta Oil Sands Gone4 The Lounge 8 02-19-2008 08:58 PM
Book report: The Last Oil Shock by David Strahan AndrewJ The Lounge 0 01-17-2008 12:55 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com