Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2009, 07:36 PM   #1 (permalink)
Relevance is irrelevant!
 
bluetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 130

CR-EX - '12 Honda CR-Z EX
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bluetwo
Corvettes?

I don't know if it's common knowledge or not but Corvettes CAN actually get really good fuel economy. I've known about this for years because there was a time when I wanted one and I spent a lot of time on Corvette forums reading up on 'em.

As I was walking by a C4 in my parking lot today it hit me that a big part of the good MPG these cars get is due to the areodynamics of the car along with, of course, power to weight ratio.

So it hit me, what if someone took a Corvette of all things and modified it to get some seriously good gas mileage? It would have to have a small economical engine so it wouldn't be fast any more! Depending on how crazy someone wanted to go with it there could even be some serious modifications involved and obviously there are a lot of people who would cry blasphemy, but who cares? ...if somebody wants to ecomod their car it's their business.

Somebody oughtta do it.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-20-2009, 07:58 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
A C5 or C6 can easily get in the low 30s as they sit with just reasonable driving.

'Vettes are fairly light and have fairly good aerodynamics. 6 speed 'C5 and C6 'Vettes have a nearly optimal drive train.

Too bad the GM 4.5 liter V-8 diesel was lost in theGM holocaust. Best option available today might be a Cummins 4BT3.9. A bit heavy (about the same as a 454 gas engine) but very efficient. It might be too tall to fit in the engine bay without a bulged hood.

The little Cummins should easily put a 'Vette into the 40s.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 08:18 PM   #3 (permalink)
Relevance is irrelevant!
 
bluetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 130

CR-EX - '12 Honda CR-Z EX
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bluetwo
^^ Definitely...

I feel there are some other things that could help it too like low rolling resistance tires of a narrower variety. Vettes come with some REALLY wide tires and that burdens them considerably.

I was thinking of a smaller engine too, maybe not even a V8 or V6 though I admit I have no idea which engine it could be right now. Most Corvettes weigh over 3,000 lbs. so less displacement would certainly mean you'd have a much slower car. So the question would be where on earth would you look to find a RWD engine that would get good mileage while having to work as hard as would be required to move that much weight.

I'm sure there aren't a lot of weight saving mods to be done so does that leave aerodynamics to improve after that? Maybe I daydream too much but hey, sometimes that's what it takes to make something better.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 08:24 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Big Dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319

The Red Baron - '00 Ford F-350 XLT
90 day: 27.99 mpg (US)

Impala Phase Zero - '96 Chevrolet Impala SS
90 day: 21.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
Narrower LRR tires would certainly help. If you want big MPG without going hybrid, go diesel. Also they have gobs of torque and nearly as satisfying to drive as a LS2.

IfI were doing it, I would start with a convertible. I'd make the windshield a bit taller (I sit as high as a man 6'10" tall) and get a custom made coupe top made for it. Of course in addition to the Cummins diesel.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Big Dave For This Useful Post:
bluetwo (08-20-2009)
Old 08-20-2009, 08:41 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Stock vette is .28cd, boat tail, LRR tires, and air damn= Aerocivic that looks good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 08:42 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Big Dave View Post
Narrower LRR tires would certainly help. If you want big MPG without going hybrid, go diesel. Also they have gobs of torque and nearly as satisfying to drive as a LS2.

IfI were doing it, I would start with a convertible. I'd make the windshield a bit taller (I sit as high as a man 6'10" tall) and get a custom made coupe top made for it. Of course in addition to the Cummins diesel.
Nearly as satisfying? IDK about that, RPMS sound good.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 09:13 PM   #7 (permalink)
Relevance is irrelevant!
 
bluetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 130

CR-EX - '12 Honda CR-Z EX
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bluetwo
So.... bear with me because I think my theory is sound. Lets say you take a truck engine that gets 25 MPG and put it in something WAY more aerodynamic, it should get a significant jump in fuel economy.

So maybe the 2.9 liter 4 cylinder from the Chevy Colorado could help? Truck guys talk about the rear ends of their trucks all the time and by reading a little I saw that a different rear axle could make the truck a lot better on gas at highway speed so that might be something to look at too.

How many people think I'm completely crazy? Ha ha...
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 09:51 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Not crazy, stupid for wanting to ruin a Corvette. jkjk

Yes, get a rear diff that gets the engine RPM's at the best efficiency at say 55mph.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 10:59 PM   #9 (permalink)
Relevance is irrelevant!
 
bluetwo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Augusta, GA
Posts: 130

CR-EX - '12 Honda CR-Z EX
Thanks: 13
Thanked 3 Times in 3 Posts
Send a message via Yahoo to bluetwo
Ha ha ha ha ha!! ...stupid, now that's a good one.

I'm telling you somebody will do it one day, maybe even me. What's also funny is no one would ever know it didn't have the original motor because Corvette guys almost never race their anyway. It would look totally normal to just putter around in it all slow.

I hope this sparks some ideas at least if not for the Vette at least for something else. Who's to say there isn't a Corvette body just sitting somewhere, needing an engine and tires and it would actually be worthwhile?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2009, 11:27 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Massachusetts
Posts: 216
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Direct-injection 2 liter turbo Ecotec from the Solstice/Sky.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com