Cosmic Catastrophe

[oil pan 4]

Yea regular matter and magnetic fields. You didn't explain it you just dismissed the idea, with the classic we see it, but we can't find so it must be there. The only thing that's being found is more and more regular matter where it was thought to be dark matter.
Here is your ridiculous dark matter:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mYcLuWHzfmE

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by oil pan 4

Yea regular matter and magnetic fields. You didn't explain it you just dismissed the idea, with the classic we see it, but we can't find so it must be there. The only thing that's being found is more and more regular matter where it was thought to be dark matter.
Here is your ridiculous dark matter:

Here's my situation:
since 2007 I've been driving a 14-mile roundtrip to Denton and back, twice a week to participate here.
I never know what I may encounter until I get here.
Between a briefcase and a backpack, I'm carrying 32-pounds of reference material, five city blocks, to and from the copy center back to the car.
If I seem dismissive, I apologize, as I'm probably experiencing something that seems counter to what I've read at home in the journals, but don't happen to have with me to help vet a response.
It may take me a month just to cover what those of you, working from home can cover in one sitting.
I'm not a cosmologist but I read their research papers. I don't trust my memory, especially for topics of which I have only a passing interest.
I'll eventually explain myself, however, it can take time.
My data is from the National Public Radio Astronomy Observatory, Greenbank, Maryland, PhD Felix J. Lockman, Principle Scientist, 2017.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The video on particle physics won't necessarily help us with respect to dark matter.

[oil pan 4]

Look it up. All the dark matter studies have failed, everything from trying to make it in the large hadron collider going always the way back to trinity if you had the clearance to see the data (old), to all the studies failing to detect it here and the found matter out there (the latest finds).
The WIMP fail is the latest one, with in the last 6 months to a year and I think it was like a decade long experiment/search with a billion dollar machine.

[aerohead]

Thanks! The clock's about run out for today. Perhaps Friday I can take a peek.

[aerohead]

Just looked at this
https://www.sciencedaily.com/release...0614153956.htm

[freebeard]

What do you make of this?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d9vFcIdrMzg

The absence of Dark matter is predicated on the galaxies not rotating as fast as they should.

[oil pan 4]

Wonderful person there is pretty main stream. The no dark matter Galaxy has been known about for a year or 2 but main stream science has been reluctant to acknowledge it.

[freebeard]

Suspicious 0bservers cites this as The Solar-Heinrich Bond Cycle - #1 Paper of 2021:

Quantitative impact of astronomical and sun-related cycles on the Pleistocene climate system from Antarctica records
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...66033421000162

Beyond the Milankovitch theory, evidence is emerging of a multiple-forcing cosmoclimatic system with stochastic interactions between external (gravitational resonances, orbitals, solar activity) and Earth's internal (geodynamics, atmosphere composition, feedback mechanisms) climate components, each having a strong difference in terms of the relative quantitative impact on Earth's climate.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

What do you make of this?

The absence of Dark matter is predicated on the galaxies not rotating as fast as they should.

A few comments:
1) cosmologists, and some of their models of the Universe, represent spatial distribution of mass to be homogeneous in very large scale, while at the same time, heterogeneous on more regional distance scales. Even on a galactic scale, a perceived absence of dark matter would not violate the mathematics.
2) Something particular to the video is the fact that, observations were limited to only the visible light spectrum.
3) Cosmological astronomy uses all-spectrum spectroscopy, from infrared photons, through gamma-ray photons.
4) Carbon stars produce a range of carbon wind products including carbon, graphite, polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, and diamonds, all exposed to all manner of steller photons, plus ions from compressive shockwaves of nearby novae and supernovae.
5) Some carbon is opaque, and has high absorption rates and heating coefficients, producing an infrared signature which can be measured from the Hubble and other observatories.
6) Some carbon, is extremely small and translucent, and it absorbs no photons, does not have any infrared signature or any other kind of signature. It is chemically inert. It survives intersteller extinction. It would not be visible to an optical, visible- wavelength photographic film or cryogenically-cooled charged-couple device at the focus of a telescope, other than occluding the view of images behind it.
7) These invisible diamonds, themselves, constitute 'missing mass'.
8) And scientists attempting to analyze diamond from chondrite meteors and comets in a laboratory setting can contaminate the findings if they're not extremely careful about how they expose the extant diamond during the test process.
9) Presently, some cosmologists are attempting new models of the Universe which place dark matter in space before the creation of galaxies, predating all accretion discs which formed all galactic and planetary systems.
Very little is known.

[aerohead]

Originally Posted by freebeard

Suspicious 0bservers cites this as The Solar-Heinrich Bond Cycle - #1 Paper of 2021:

Quantitative impact of astronomical and sun-related cycles on the Pleistocene climate system from Antarctica records
https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...66033421000162

Last I heard, present general circulation models, played forwards and backwards, accurately portray what happened in the distant past, a hundred years or so ago, and have accurately predicted climate change as we're experiencing it today.
Any newly-discovered cosmological 'link' would seem to offer a solution to a problem which doesn't exist.