10-22-2014, 10:42 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Just cruisin’ along
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,183
Thanks: 66
Thanked 200 Times in 170 Posts
|
Honestly, it doesn't take very long for a manual to become such second nature that I barely notice the act of shifting. I like the economy of manuals, and I'd be lying if I said that the control wasn't an intoxicating factor too. But more than anything, I love the game of shifting, moving three limbs in unison to execute a perfect start or shift every time, selecting the right cog, or the ol rev-match/clutch less shift game. There's so many little ways to play with a standard trans that it really helps to lessen the monotony.
Having said that, automatics are certainly closing the fuel economy gap, and are relatively less expensive than they used to be. I myself used to be split and figured both were more or less equal, but as my interests have gone towards older ways of doing things, I find that I relish ways of doing stuff that's perhaps a bit more intensive on the person doing it. I like the hands-on approach to things.
__________________
'97 Honda Civic DX Coupe 5MT - dead 2/23
'00 Echo - dead 2/17
'14 Chrysler Town + Country - My DD, for now
'67 Mustang Convertible - gone 1/17
Last edited by jcp123; 10-22-2014 at 10:56 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 09:32 AM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
You don't understand: they need quad cabs with diesels to commute in. And the place I work would be hurting if we didn't sell piles of chrome sidesteps, air deflectors, door handles and fuel filler doors to all these manly guys.
And shifting is hard. You're asking too much from these guys.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 11:52 AM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Charlie
And shifting is hard. You're asking too much from these guys.
|
Not just difficult, but annoying, irritating, frustrating, aggravating, lame, a real drag, and anything else that I have ever been called.
Selfie!
Why should we shift when there is an app for that?!
This is bizarre, the address is The Advantages of Buying a Manual Transmission Vehicle, but it sends you to Five Myths About Stick Shifts: Manual vs Automatic Transmissions, which almost exclusively gives perceived advantages of automatics, and dismisses people who prefer manuals as nostalgic.
Why would you want a manual shifter when you could have this?!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Trucker7
Also, I never managed to drive an automatic. It runs fine on D (Day mode), but stops moving when I put it in night mode.
|
City-Data Forum - View Single Post - Why are manual transmission vehicles unpopular in the USA?
Last edited by Xist; 10-23-2014 at 11:57 AM..
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 11:59 AM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1,823
Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by fat charlie
you don't understand: They need quad cabs with diesels to commute in. And the place i work would be hurting if we didn't sell piles of chrome sidesteps, air deflectors, door handles and fuel filler doors to all these manly guys.
And shifting is hard. You're asking too much from these guys.
|
lol!!
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 01:01 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Rat Racer
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
|
Oh God, I had to drive one of those dial shifts last week. It was horrible!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @∞MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%
|
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 01:04 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
AND it has an electric parking brake button too. Yikes. Hate those.
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 04:21 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Boston, MA, USA
Posts: 3
Bieyacht - '14 Subaru Forester 2.5i Premium MT 90 day: 32.67 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Was happy to find that my '14 Forester had a 6 speed MT, was unhappy to find that you can't get the panoramic roof with the MT. WTH. The MT is rated 29mpg HWY, 32 for the AT. Head scratcher. I'm able to get 34mpg or so mostly backroads (35-50 mph). Wish it had a taller 6th gear. :-(
Doing great in the warmer weather (40.8% above EPA mixed), not so great in the winter with shorter trips (gets EPA mixed, or at least it did last winter).
Would miss a MT if I didn't have it, would get rid of it if I drove more in traffic.
I do enjoy the "MT" experience on my bicycle. :-)
The new Honda Fit has a 6MT. Was surprised to see it, but it's encouraging.
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 04:33 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
.........................
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
AND it has an electric parking brake button too. Yikes. Hate those.
|
Same here. Foot operated parking brakes are annoying, but I really don't want electric parking brakes on anything of mine. Do they even work as an emergency brake any more?
And WTF does "S" mean on that shifter?
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 04:40 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
I'll jump on this wagon. I'm about to finally get back into a manual car after well over a year of driving all automatics... I can not wait!
|
|
|
10-23-2014, 04:47 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Human Environmentalist
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,737
Thanks: 4,316
Thanked 4,467 Times in 3,432 Posts
|
Up until recently, I was of the opinion that I would want an auto in traffic. After realizing how zen-like it has been to drive in traffic while leaving a gap, and observing my MPG rise above my highway economy, I've decided a manual is preferred in stop and go.
Now the only place I would prefer an auto is San Francisco.
Quote:
Originally Posted by darcane
And WTF does "S" mean on that shifter?
|
I assume "sport". AKA, waste more fuel and still go slow, mode.
|
|
|
|