Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: Do you think people would buy a diesel-powered 60s American Classic?
Yes, they'd be lining up to pay $8k or more 9 17.65%
Sure, there'd be a few people interested in paying $6k-8k 15 29.41%
Good luck, I'm sure someone would pay $4k-6k 10 19.61%
It's your dream, but you might be alone on this one 17 33.33%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 01-08-2012, 10:21 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Um, that's what conversion systems are for...
Heat up the oil before it even gets to the IP so it thins out the fuel. With a two-tank system there's no worry about a cold engine either

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 01-08-2012, 10:32 PM   #22 (permalink)
Easter McoModder
 
SwamiSalami's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West Texas, US
Posts: 363

'99 Subaru OLL 2.5L - '99 Subaru Outback Legacy Limited
90 day: 22.57 mpg (US)

Rabbit - '08 VW Rabbit S
90 day: 32.93 mpg (US)
Thanks: 212
Thanked 28 Times in 26 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacolocho View Post
Um, that's what conversion systems are for...
Heat up the oil before it even gets to the IP so it thins out the fuel. With a two-tank system there's no worry about a cold engine either

I was referring to the gentleman from New Mexico, which I indicated by quoting him in my reply. This is customary on forums in which multiple users are responding to other users. Things can get a little sticky conversationally.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-08-2012, 10:40 PM   #23 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
I was referring to the gentleman from New Mexico, which I indicated by quoting him in my reply. This is customary on forums in which multiple users are responding to other users. Things can get a little sticky conversationally.
I was as well, sorry for the confusion
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 04:54 AM   #24 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
The DB2 serries can pump anything as long as you dont over do it.
I have burned many gallons of used motor oil, used vegetable oil, used hydraulic fluid, used turbine engine oil. Used motor oil causes you to go through a lot of fuel filters, thats why I use a G3 fuel filter as a primary $3.50 each and they last at least 3 or 4 months and with my more powerful duel electric fuel pump setup they should last a lot longer.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 06:46 AM   #25 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by lacolocho View Post
If I'm doing the swap myself, where is this cost factor coming in?
The engine.
Time spent - though that'd depend on how you see this project.
Assorted stuff you may need to complete the conversion - adapter plates, different length shafts, ...
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 02:28 PM   #26 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
In my opinion, there might be a market, but not necessarily in the area you are thinking. The "classic" muscle cars might not see much benefit from these swaps because the people who are drawn to them would rather be running high displacement, high HP motors.

You might be better off converting the less desirable cars from the 50s, 60s and 70s. Quite a few hipsters/scensters want to be different and driving something that matches their fedoras, cardigans, and 35mm cameras would fit the bill. They are only interested in image anyway, so they probably wouldn't even be bothered with what's under the hood. Then again, if they could brag to their friends about a 40 mpg "classic," that would be even more of an incentive.

Also, because of different safety regulations, many of the cars from that era are remarkably light sans engine. You could probably get away with swapping in ~ 2.0L diesels (with or without turbos) and be fine.

Anyway, I think your idea has legs. Never underestimate a person's willingness to pay to be different. What was it Walt Disney said about the first idea he would work on was the one that everyone told him wouldn't work?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 02:32 PM   #27 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Assorted stuff you may need to complete the conversion - adapter plates, different length shafts
No need for adapter plates! I'd either be doing the GM diesel swap or an entire Mercedes OM617 swap with engine and tranny together.

Quote:
You might be better off converting the less desirable cars from the 50s, 60s and 70s. Quite a few hipsters/scensters want to be different and driving something that matches their fedoras, cardigans, and 35mm cameras would fit the bill. They are only interested in image anyway, so they probably wouldn't even be bothered with what's under the hood. Then again, if they could brag to their friends about a 40 mpg "classic," that would be even more of an incentive.
This is EXACTLY the market that I'm referring to!
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 02:36 PM   #28 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Oregon
Posts: 21
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Also, because of different safety regulations, many of the cars from that era are remarkably light sans engine. You could probably get away with swapping in ~ 2.0L diesels (with or without turbos) and be fine.
I agree. The problem is that I would want to put an engine in that is easy to find parts for rather than something obscure. I really like the Nissan LD28 that was put into the Maximas: 2.8L straight six with timing chain instead of a belt.
Although, essentially what's most important is what I could get my hands on for cheap that has low miles and in good shape.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 04:01 PM   #29 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
The diesel conversion is going to cost a lot; diesel is more expensive in the US; and these cars are unlikely to be driven the kind of miles that would make diesel operation economical; swapping in a 6+ L diesel is hardly an economy measure.

GM killed the diesel car market in the US a long time ago and our government works to surpress diesel applications in anything but heavy duty passanger pickups and vans so all we really have for easy to get old diesel engines are these old truck engines.

Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Those old battleships often have plenty of space, why not add LPG to a petrol engine ?
The same thing can be done with diesels with intake fumigation you can run them off both LPG and diesel while being able to still run off diesel alone.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ladogaboy View Post
You could probably get away with swapping in ~ 2.0L diesels (with or without turbos) and be fine.
The problem with non-turbo diesels in the 2L range is they are only going to put out about 50hp.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-09-2012, 04:07 PM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The problem with non-turbo diesels in the 2L range is they are only going to put out about 50hp.
In a sub-2,500 lb car with the proper transmission/gearing, would that be a problem? Besides, the people who would drive these cars would appreciate the extra attention they get by not being able to drive the speed limit.

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com