Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-05-2019, 09:33 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
royanddoreen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: glovertown nl canada
Posts: 87

z - '03 nissan 350z touring
90 day: 36.21 mpg (US)

Diniro - '18 Kia Niro Ex
90 day: 47.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 35
Thanked 6 Times in 4 Posts
dragging dust

Noticed on my Kia Niro Suv a large amount of dust on my rear window after driving about 15 min on gravel road. What brought it to my attention was 2 other suvs a Rav4 and a Suzuki x7 which had little dust driving over the same road. So is my ecco niro having drag issues? Feel free to correct my grammar!

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-05-2019, 01:22 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Eugene, OR, USA
Posts: 237

Lord Vader - '15 BMW i3 REx
90 day: 35.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 38
Thanked 74 Times in 60 Posts
I'm thinking that accumulation is not by itself an indicator of bad aero other than where turbulence is being picked up into the wake from. The Rav4 has a higher drag coefficient of 0.31 to your 0.30 from what I found. Not sure on the Suzuki.

Perhaps you just drive faster?
__________________
2015 BMW i3 REx
2011 Ford Flex SEL AWD
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-05-2019, 06:54 PM   #3 (permalink)
Tyrant-at-large
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,434

Little Red - retired - '05 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 49.03 mpg (US)

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.34 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 1,206 Times in 636 Posts
As Snax intimated, I wouldn't read anything into this.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019)
Old 08-06-2019, 11:26 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,579

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 23.93 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 40.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 1,485 Times in 940 Posts
My Insight gets virtually no dust on the hatch top window, which should have nearly laminar flow, but gets a lot of dirt on the vertical window at the back, where there is a lot of turbulence.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019)
Old 08-06-2019, 01:35 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Missoula, MT
Posts: 1,828

Dark Egg - '12 VW Touareg TDI Sport AWD
90 day: 25.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 130
Thanked 667 Times in 454 Posts
Some vehicles get less dirt on the back glass because they have a diffuser or slots through the rear roof spoiler to push clean air off the roof across the back window. My Forester had a plastic diffuser and my Minivan has a slot in the spoiler.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Hersbird For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019)
Old 08-06-2019, 04:59 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Piotrsko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 810
Thanks: 31
Thanked 196 Times in 165 Posts
since it is a MK6 Golf pet peeve, does those rice racer vortex generators do anything for the vortex calming?
__________________
2000 F250 7.3 CC 20+ MPG @ 10000 #
2013 Golf tdi 47.5 mpg neutered, 1500 mi beer run
1988 Ranger EV Volt batts>> 18,000 MPG and climbing. Rag overhaul.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2019, 06:44 PM   #7 (permalink)
Tyrant-at-large
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Champaign, IL
Posts: 1,434

Little Red - retired - '05 Honda Civic EX
90 day: 49.03 mpg (US)

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.34 mpg (US)
Thanks: 142
Thanked 1,206 Times in 636 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ecky View Post
My Insight gets virtually no dust on the hatch top window, which should have nearly laminar flow, but gets a lot of dirt on the vertical window at the back, where there is a lot of turbulence.
Just a terminology note: "laminar" =/= "attached." That far back on any car at any appreciable speed*, the flow is turbulent--but attached over the rear window as you observed.

*Flow characteristics are related to the Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the inertial forces acting on the fluid particles to the viscous forces. When the inertial forces outweigh the viscous forces, i.e. Reynolds number is large, the flow will be turbulent. And since the inertial forces are the product of fluid velocity and test length, as speed increases or the point of investigation moves further along the body, Reynolds number increases. Since the kinematic viscosity of air is very small, 1.46x10^-5 m^2/s, it doesn't take much speed or much length for the flow over a car to transition from laminar to turbulent.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Vman455 For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019), Ecky (08-06-2019)
Old 08-06-2019, 07:54 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,579

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 23.93 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 40.97 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,341
Thanked 1,485 Times in 940 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
Just a terminology note: "laminar" =/= "attached." That far back on any car at any appreciable speed*, the flow is turbulent--but attached over the rear window as you observed.

*Flow characteristics are related to the Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the inertial forces acting on the fluid particles to the viscous forces. When the inertial forces outweigh the viscous forces, i.e. Reynolds number is large, the flow will be turbulent. And since the inertial forces are the product of fluid velocity and test length, as speed increases or the point of investigation moves further along the body, Reynolds number increases. Since the kinematic viscosity of air is very small, 1.46x10^-5 m^2/s, it doesn't take much speed or much length for the flow over a car to transition from laminar to turbulent.
I stand corrected.

Regardless it's pretty cool to be able to drive through a rainstorm and have a nearly horizontal window at the back of the car remain completely dry.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ecky For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019)
Old 08-07-2019, 09:37 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
slowmover's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,371

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,347
Thanked 690 Times in 524 Posts
Tires, engine fan, underbody.
__________________
2004.0 DODGE Ram QC/LB 2500 2WD/NV-5600 305/555 ISB. 7,940-lb. Stock. 200,000 miles/5000-hrs @ 40-mph average.
1990 35' Silver Streak TT 7,900-lb.
11-cpm solo & 19-cpm towing; 21-mpg average past 54k-miles
Sold: 1983 Silver Streak 3411
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to slowmover For This Useful Post:
aerohead (08-07-2019)
Old 08-07-2019, 12:09 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 10,464
Thanks: 16,088
Thanked 5,559 Times in 3,323 Posts
transition length

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vman455 View Post
Just a terminology note: "laminar" =/= "attached." That far back on any car at any appreciable speed*, the flow is turbulent--but attached over the rear window as you observed.

*Flow characteristics are related to the Reynolds number, which is the ratio of the inertial forces acting on the fluid particles to the viscous forces. When the inertial forces outweigh the viscous forces, i.e. Reynolds number is large, the flow will be turbulent. And since the inertial forces are the product of fluid velocity and test length, as speed increases or the point of investigation moves further along the body, Reynolds number increases. Since the kinematic viscosity of air is very small, 1.46x10^-5 m^2/s, it doesn't take much speed or much length for the flow over a car to transition from laminar to turbulent.
There was a Master's thesis on a RAM pickup,which included a CFD study.According to the numerical model,at supercritical Reynolds number,the pickup had 30mm of laminar boundary layer at the nose.The rest was turbulent.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
Vman455 (08-07-2019)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com