Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-21-2012, 05:17 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Sven7's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Warren, MI
Posts: 2,456

Boo Radley - '65 Ford F100
90 day: 13.28 mpg (US)
Thanks: 782
Thanked 668 Times in 410 Posts
When we're talking E0 is that also 89 octane or am I forced to buy something higher like 91 or 93 with premium? $0.10 more for a gallon at $3.50 will be a 3% increase in price, so it would mandate a 3% increase in mileage, or 1.2mpg (at 40mpg). Sounds fair. If premium is $0.20 higher it would become iffy.

List of all known ethanol free stations in the US: just click your state and read.
http://pure-gas.org/index.jsp?stateprov=MI

__________________
He gave me a dollar. A blood-soaked dollar.
I cannot get the spot out but it's okay; It still works in the store
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-21-2012, 05:22 PM   #12 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
I would think a blender pump would have to rate various blends at different octane levels, since ethanol has a higher octane rating. For lower blends, I doubt an octane correction is feasible, as the stations would have to stock that as well as two tanks.

I've never heard of a blender pump until this thread. It would rock for my track racer, I need high octane, and I could tune it for a specific ethanol blend. E50+ here I come.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 05:34 PM   #13 (permalink)
The road not so traveled
 
TheEnemy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680

The Truck - '99 Nissan Frontier xe
90 day: 25.74 mpg (US)

The Ugly Duck - '84 Jeep CJ7 Rock crawler
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
I would think a blender pump would have to rate various blends at different octane levels, since ethanol has a higher octane rating. For lower blends, I doubt an octane correction is feasible, as the stations would have to stock that as well as two tanks.

I've never heard of a blender pump until this thread. It would rock for my track racer, I need high octane, and I could tune it for a specific ethanol blend. E50+ here I come.
I think 100% ethanol has an octane that is something like 110.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 06:48 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
nemo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: US
Posts: 1,015

Chief - '06 Pontiac Grand Prix
90 day: 26.7 mpg (US)

SF1 - '12 Ford Fiesta S
90 day: 30.95 mpg (US)
Thanks: 195
Thanked 247 Times in 190 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by UFO View Post
I've never heard of a blender pump until this thread.
Sunoco used blender pumps at one time. There were 6 or 7 blends, each having different octane ratings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 07:17 PM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
you have ALL ran e20 before.

the ethanol content is such a joke, and no one can tell anything. the mixers run all sorts of crazy stuff in the gasoline we buy today.

The cars don't car within reason.

I've run e50 in my cars - they run fine, a little less mileage, other then that no big deal.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 07:38 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnemy View Post
I think 100% ethanol has an octane that is something like 110.
I think it depends on delivery. When direct injected strategically to provide maximum cooling effect before ignition, it could be even higher (much much higher), and the efficiency will improve because you are using some of the cooling effect to reduce work required for compression rather than allowing the heat of combustion to provide the necessary heat for evaporation. Done correctly I think I read that you can get better mpg for certain blends despite the lower heat energy in the ethanol fuel.

I believe there is an MIT study where they were able to get the "equivalent" of 150 octane by injecting E85, and supplementing with 87 via port injection.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 08:45 PM   #17 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: central Ohio
Posts: 122

Gray Jellybean - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 62.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 16 Times in 11 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
I think it depends on delivery. When direct injected strategically to provide maximum cooling effect before ignition, it could be even higher (much much higher), and the efficiency will improve because you are using some of the cooling effect to reduce work required for compression rather than allowing the heat of combustion to provide the necessary heat for evaporation. Done correctly I think I read that you can get better mpg for certain blends despite the lower heat energy in the ethanol fuel.

I believe there is an MIT study where they were able to get the "equivalent" of 150 octane by injecting E85, and supplementing with 87 via port injection.
The form of fuel injection does not raise its octane rating because octane is its chemical resistance to detonation. Direct fuel injection of ethanol is more like mechanical resistance (not sure if I am explaining right so feel free to correct me). However you are completely correct in regards to significance.

Ford built such an engine, a 5.0 v8 if memory serves. They were able to get something like 1200 hp at 45 lbs. of boost (again from questionable memory) on pump gas. Of course, one cylinder of that engine could drive a standard size passenger car easily with a more advanced valve train and the lower friction. This is ethanol's future, as a supplementary fuel in a dual fuel setup. If you want bio fuel for an Otto cycle engine, make butanol.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 09:24 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Pretty sure E85 has ocatane rating of 105.

In this thread I ran multiple blends thru the Stratus.

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...nol-18896.html

Almost unbelieveable corrilation between energy content and MPG, yes just one 14 yo car but those are the results. When petro hit's $5 in 2 months E85 shouldn't keep up. I'll be running the highest blend Stratus will allow.

My next car is going to be a Cobalt, new HHR's are FFV with the same engine, I doubt there are many different part numbers. But I'll find out for sure once I buy one.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 09:30 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Briggsdale, Colorado
Posts: 296

Wildfire - '96 Ford Bronco XL
90 day: 14.88 mpg (US)

Blackford - '96 Ford Bronco XLT
90 day: 20.26 mpg (US)

Y2k - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 73.98 mpg (US)

Redford V10 - '01 Ford F250 Lariat
90 day: 15.64 mpg (US)

FireFly - '00 Honda Insight DX
90 day: 69.43 mpg (US)

LittleRed - '00 Honda Insight
Thanks: 3
Thanked 31 Times in 14 Posts
gas station 3 miles from work still sells Sinclair 88 octane pure gas (E0). I think I will stick with that.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-21-2012, 09:33 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: na
Posts: 1,025
Thanks: 277
Thanked 218 Times in 185 Posts
Your choice, and I'm all for choice, but I'd rather as much of my dollar stay in this country as I can, and be spent over and over again rather than leaving once.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com