12-04-2009, 11:40 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: WA, USA
Posts: 13
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Efficiency increase with a warmer engine? (195F vs 165F)
Had some work done on the car this week (t-belt, water pump, t-stat, and other stuff). With the change of the thermostat came a change in the operating temperature of the car.
Looking back I should have realized that the car was running cool, especially the last couple weeks since I got the ScanGauge and had a digital temp reading. Most likely the t-stat was opening way too early, or even staying open slightly. The cars 'normal' operating temp was ~165F, and would cool down when in DFCO, sometimes quite noticeably (down to 120F on one long downhill in 5th gear). Thus it was still flowing coolant through the radiator and cooling it even when then there was no extra heat load.
With the new thermostat I'm now seeing the factory gauge "where it should be", and the digital gauge is telling me ~195F (its a 188F t-stat, tested and it does open right at that). Also the engine temp is steady now on a long deceleration with fuel cutoff.
So what I'm wondering, is there some efficiency gained now that the engine is running 30F warmer than it used to? I'd say the oil is slightly thinner at the higher temps, but that's questionable with the viscosity modifiers. What about the cylinders, any chance of better combustion with the warmer engine block?
__________________
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
12-05-2009, 12:20 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
Absolutely! You may have not been getting the fuel injection controller out of the enriched mode, and more of the fuel will be vaporized.
|
|
|
12-05-2009, 01:53 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
In Lean Burn Mode
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Pacific NW
Posts: 1,553
Thanks: 1,315
Thanked 602 Times in 391 Posts
|
Here's a coolant temperature correction map off my Haltech.
As you can see when the engines coolant is cooler there is more of a increase based in % added to the pulse width of the injectors.
Factory ecu's will even have more of a correction all the way up to normal operating temperatures.
__________________
Pressure Gradient Force
The Positive Side of the Number Line
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to pgfpro For This Useful Post:
|
|
12-07-2009, 10:31 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Mechanical Engineer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Your brake thermal efficiency increases with increased engine operating temperature. The theoretical Otto cycle efficiency is always higher than actual thermal efficiency due to the adiabatic assumption in the theory not applying in the real world. The hotter your engine runs, the less heat of combustion is lost to the block walls, and the closer you approximate the adiabatic (zero heat transfer) ideal.
__________________
|
|
|
12-08-2009, 11:21 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Live in Tucson AZ, work and car now in Detroit
Posts: 200
Thanks: 13
Thanked 23 Times in 18 Posts
|
"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice there is."
Don't remember where I got the quote but your last post, I think, said the same thing.
|
|
|
12-08-2009, 11:38 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard
Absolutely! You may have not been getting the fuel injection controller out of the enriched mode, and more of the fuel will be vaporized.
|
Agreed. I'll bet your old thermo wasn't opening fully, hence the reduced operating temp. Thermos are a PITA in that they can fail partially and be problematic in operating only marginally. You probably didn't have much heat from the heater in the interior either, if you noticed.
|
|
|
12-09-2009, 09:35 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...would co$t more, but an electronic thermostat (controlled by ECU) would get the job done much better! (servo-mechanical flow control or electric pump control)
...it could hold the flow totally off until it's actually needed, and then only pump or pass just enough coolant to keep thermal equilibrium.
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 09:36 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Mechanical Engineer
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 190
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man
...would co$t more, but an electronic thermostat (controlled by ECU) would get the job done much better! (servo-mechanical flow control or electric pump control)
...it could hold the flow totally off until it's actually needed, and then only pump or pass just enough coolant to keep thermal equilibrium.
|
It's been a long time, but I remember pan-testing a thermostat on the stove. I seriously doubt you would be able to detect any cooling performance increase from a servo-actuated thermostat as I recall the spring thermostat nearly jumped out of the pan when it opened up, and they continuously adjust pretty well if temperature drops too low. They are fast-opening on warmup and maintain low enough flow to stay at their design temperature pretty well. An old, tried-and-true design not likely to be replaced until our vehicles no longer need liquid cooling systems.
__________________
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 09:49 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
...agreed, not a co$t-effective replacement today, but when electric water pumps eventually become more common, under ECU control, it would certainly be more energy efficient to modulate total flow and use energy pumping coolant around only when you really have to.
...instead of "pumping" all the time and then apply "throttling" on top of that.
|
|
|
12-10-2009, 10:03 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Moderate your Moderation.
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919
Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi 90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
|
If the electric water pump is ECU controlled, why would you need a t-stat at all?
I mean, the ECU could just shut off the pump and monitor temps until the pump needed to move the hot coolant.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"
|
|
|
|