01-03-2008, 08:46 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Awesomeness personified
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus
It just a standard 18 speed road bike made by Iron Horse.
|
Ok, thats at least a good starting point, I was sure it had to be a road bike by the 17mph average speed, but hey, who knows, you could have been Lance Armstrong on a DH bike or something.
Anyway, if you're trying to get faster, keep in mind that the aerodynamics of bikes is a bit different than cars. Namely, the "tipping point" where aerodynamics become an important factor is around 20mph (or so I have heard from multiple sources)
It seems that once you pass 20mph on a bike, over 50% of your energy is going to combat aerodynamic drag, and it just goes up from there. I think the source for that tidbit is the League of American Bicyclists' "Road I" course, but I could be wrong.
So, the key to making a battery last longer might be aeromodding your bike. Look into time trial stuff for your bike. Most of it is expensive, and somewhat heavy, but an aerobar wouldn't cost much, and getting into a more aerodynamic tuck would be hugely helpful.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 08:56 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
That would be the way of the ForkenSwift, yes. (Minus the last step about getting better ones.)
A tip that might solve the expense problem: I know a guy who services security & fire alarms. He can pretty much keep me in as many used 12v 7AH SLA batteries as I can take. I've actually been using them (a couple in parallel) in the ForkenSwift for accessory power.
These are automatically replaced when they don't meet the company's 80% performance criteria.
Might be worth dropping by a local security alarm business or making a few calls.
|
You (or someone else in the know) should post up sometime on various sources of free batts and things that might be useful to people (like the vw solar panels), you know?
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 09:07 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
ECO-Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ
Ok, thats at least a good starting point, I was sure it had to be a road bike by the 17mph average speed, but hey, who knows, you could have been Lance Armstrong on a DH bike or something.
Anyway, if you're trying to get faster, keep in mind that the aerodynamics of bikes is a bit different than cars. Namely, the "tipping point" where aerodynamics become an important factor is around 20mph (or so I have heard from multiple sources)
It seems that once you pass 20mph on a bike, over 50% of your energy is going to combat aerodynamic drag, and it just goes up from there. I think the source for that tidbit is the League of American Bicyclists' "Road I" course, but I could be wrong.
So, the key to making a battery last longer might be aeromodding your bike. Look into time trial stuff for your bike. Most of it is expensive, and somewhat heavy, but an aerobar wouldn't cost much, and getting into a more aerodynamic tuck would be hugely helpful.
|
Good points. I've tried the aero bars and it a little to dangerous for city commuting. Quick access to brakes is a common reality, also control and visibility are a little marginal when dealing with cars and road debris. I've thought about a fairing of some sort like a motorcycle but I think the increase in drag would offset the aero benefits for a standard bicycle.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 09:41 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Re: in-town riding... Do I take it a 'bent is out of the question then? Do bents not offer more efficiency?
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 10:15 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Awesomeness personified
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
|
Depends on the hillyness factor. 'Bents are better in the flat stuff because of the better aero. On the hills they suffer because the riders seating arrangement isn't ideal for powering up a hill.
On a "normal" bike the rider can use gravity (their own body weight) to assist them in climbing by standing up on the pedals.
As with everything, what you're dealing with here is tradeoffs. If you're looking to go faster up the hills you'll need something completely different than if you're looking to bomb down the flats faster.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 10:18 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
So it would seem to me then that an e-assisted bent would be the best combination of compromises...
|
|
|
01-03-2008, 10:24 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Awesomeness personified
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Columbia, MO
Posts: 642
Thanks: 0
Thanked 28 Times in 18 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lazarus
Good points. I've tried the aero bars and it a little to dangerous for city commuting. Quick access to brakes is a common reality
|
Have you thought then about full on TT bars?
for commuting I would switch the placement of the shifters and the brake levers, and add cyclocross-style "interruptor" levers on the straight part of the bullhorn bars.
That way you have one set of brake levers for each hand position.
__________________
"I got 350 heads on a 305 engine. I get 10 miles to the gallon. I ain't got no good intentions." - The Drive By Truckers.
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 08:55 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
ECO-Evolution
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Central Texas
Posts: 1,482
Thanks: 17
Thanked 45 Times in 34 Posts
|
Interesting idea with the brakes.
No bent here. I don't want to start a which is better debate but I prefer a road bike. I have a lot of rolling terrain and I like the hight, visibility and maneuverability of a road bike.
__________________
"Judge a person by their questions rather than their answers."
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 10:13 AM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
Them's fightin' words!
Just kidding.
|
|
|
01-04-2008, 08:34 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Santa Cruz, CA.
Posts: 871
White Whale - '03 Chrysler Town & Country mini van all white
Thanks: 69
Thanked 44 Times in 39 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by AndrewJ
Depends on the hillyness factor. 'Bents are better in the flat stuff because of the better aero. On the hills they suffer because the riders seating arrangement isn't ideal for powering up a hill.
|
Kind of a myth since that depends on the engine. Some are slow, some aren't: same as 1920 diamond frame bikes. But anyway; in this thread the engine is a combination of human power *and* a hub motor, is it not?
Excellent addition! I had an Electric Sierra Cycles 36 V hub motor installed in my fully enclosed recumbent trike, and hills are no problem at all!
countersTrike <---------------
|
|
|
|