01-27-2012, 02:25 PM
|
#61 (permalink)
|
The road not so traveled
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
|
Using my Jeep as a comparison to those motors torque values because I know the gears on it.
Engine 230ftlbs at 1800rpm,
First gear 3.3:1
T-case (Low range) 2.6:1
Axle 3.54:1
Gives me 6,985 ftlbs to the axle shafts
*0.8 to account for drive line losses = 5588ftlbs
Now granted the only times I am anywhere near that torque rating is when pulling someone, or bound up in the rocks, or when I have entered it into the mud bogs which is <1% of the time
5th gear .75:1
Tcase (high range) 1:1
Axle 3.54:1
1600rpm at 75mph (at full throttle) est 210 ftlbs from the engine
=446ftlbs
At 75mph I'm making 210*1600/5252 = 64hp (yes its a cinderblock on wheels)
Converting to kwh for a 150mile 2 hour trip I would need about 100kwh. (only a couple times a year with this thing)
Its a good thing this is my weekend beater.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 02:27 PM
|
#62 (permalink)
|
The road not so traveled
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 680
Thanks: 18
Thanked 66 Times in 57 Posts
|
If I used those motors in the Jeep (yes I have been thinking about electrifying it) I would still want a gearbox T-case only maybe.
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 08:47 PM
|
#63 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Boise Idaho
Posts: 842
Thanks: 39
Thanked 89 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheEnemy
Using my Jeep as a comparison to those motors torque values because I know the gears on it.
*0.8 to account for drive line losses = 5588ftlbs
.
|
rev the engine, and drop the clutch, and your torque at the wheels will be even higher.
|
|
|
01-27-2012, 11:36 PM
|
#64 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
The FVT motors and the YASA motors are direct drive, and that torque is at the output shafts. On the YASA motor torque / efficiency graph, it shows it has that 750Nm (533ft/lbs) is available as low as ~100RPM. That would mangle most gears, and gears that are strong enough would lose power through friction. Heck, the YASA has peak efficiency of 94-95% without any gears!
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:00 AM
|
#65 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
My Maxima differential has been handling more than that for 13 years and 144,000 miles Neil, with the fluid changed once, long after your batteries have died and you need to spend what my car cost new to replace them. About 6000 gallons of gas.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:03 AM
|
#66 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
Va Tech calculated my in wheel drive produced 380 pounds feet of torque at 0 RPM.
Per wheel at 99% efficiency at 0 RPM. Your motor can't touch that or regenerate any significant amount of energy.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:32 AM
|
#67 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:39 AM
|
#68 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
15% loss from your meter to the motor, at 100% motor efficiency your are never going to get better than 85%. Lets say the average, not peak, efficiency is 90%. Now you are at 90X85=76.5%
Also no decent regeneration efficiency in any direct drive setup so you only get back say 30% from regeneration, probably less since you can't recover several hundred horsepower seconds of energy in 22 revolutions of the wheels, especially with 2 wheel drive.
regards
Mech
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:47 AM
|
#69 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic
|
Man, I understand that they are trying to assuage fears about the battery life, but this is just a basic marketing tactic. "Battery replacements starting in the hundreds of dollars." I wonder how many modules would need to be replaced before the thousands start adding up....
__________________
|
|
|
01-28-2012, 12:56 AM
|
#70 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
|
|
|
|
|