Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-06-2013, 02:26 AM   #121 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
Ya, I'm not sure why the link defaulted to Ottawa, ON, but I'm guessing it used the ecomodder server IP address to generate a link with places near it... supposedly, if you clink on the link, it will try to guess where you are and then list nearby locations for recycling. I also listed some common places you can bring the lithiums for recycling: No cost for mailing or hazmat fees if you've got a place like that nearby; just drop 'em off if you're going there anyway.
Lets just hope those batteries live up to their hype and I don't have to worry about replacing them for a long time, maybe by then lithium collection will become more main stream.

__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-06-2013, 02:36 AM   #122 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by jamesqf View Post
That's not smart meters, that's load shedding. Utilities have been doing it since at least the '80s. Users with non-critical loads like irrigation pumps get lower rates in exchange for allowing the utility to cut off the power if system demand exceeds supply.
Only problem is all the major water pumpers I know opted not to have their rates lowered in exchange for cutting power to their pumps during peak demand.
Problem is on consecutive 100'F+ degree days is when they need water most, pumps run 24hrs or stuff starts dieing.
Thats why they were so mad when they found their pumps not running.

This use to not be a problem but the government forced all the farmers around here to use electrical power to drive their pumps. They use to use natural gas up through the 1990s.
But you drive and hour or 2 into texas and they still use ICE driven irrigation pumps.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 07:36 AM   #123 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
A range of different renewable energy sources that are spread out geographically can provide plenty of energy - as much as SIXTEEN TIMES as much as we currently use.
With that much energy available, we could get by with very little storage.

Solar PV works right at the peak demand for A/C. Wind blows more at night, and waves are continuous is some parts of the ocean, and the tides are huge in some areas, and geothermal is easily available in some areas.

We can store methane gas that comes from digesters, that use either sewage or farm waste. Solar heat systems can store molten salt underground for days. Grid storage batteries are happening right now. Flywheel and compressed air (stored underground) and elevated reservoirs are known technologies.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/

Last edited by NeilBlanchard; 07-06-2013 at 10:27 AM.. Reason: typo
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 09:24 AM   #124 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Not being sarcastic, but I have to wonder what the vehicle would ultimately look like that was capable of running on ANY/ALL of those energy sources:

• Solar cell roof
• Sail (circular, square of triangular?)
• Steam (from geothermal "gas" stations)
• Methane (or CNG)
• Flywheel (good place for heavy batteries!)
• Compressed (hot) air (something useful from our politicians?)

...I almost invision a 'mechanical' Camel (...horse by committee...) Ha,ha!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 11:17 AM   #125 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
The only way to balance production and demand is by adding more production or mandating less demand.
Or Option C , you didn't include ... storage of excess production during those times when demand reduces on its own ... no mandated less demand required ... no increased production required.

Most places around the country have time periods when the demand actually dips bellow the minimum base load of the utilities facilities ... some of them don't just turn on and off ... so some of them just waste fuel and throw away the base load that is beyond the current real time demand.

A smarter grid has less of that waste.

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Only problem is all the major water pumpers I know opted not to have their rates lowered in exchange for cutting power to their pumps during peak demand.
Problem is on consecutive 100'F+ degree days is when they need water most, pumps run 24hrs or stuff starts dieing.
Thats why they were so mad when they found their pumps not running.

This use to not be a problem but the government forced all the farmers around here to use electrical power to drive their pumps. They use to use natural gas up through the 1990s.
But you drive and hour or 2 into texas and they still use ICE driven irrigation pumps.
That's a potential problem of being dependent on someone else ... even the utility grid.

They could invest in their own energy independence ... I've known several farmers when I lived in Lancaster Pa that invested in biogas digested tanks ... to turn their farm plant and animal waste into combustible gas , which ran all of their farm equipment , including the water irrigation pumps , tractors , and everything else ... even had surplus to run converted pickup trucks for local errands and such... some also put up RE like wind or solar in order to reach their goal of energy self sufficiency... but others had surplus just from the biogas without any other RE added.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 12:46 PM   #126 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
extra storage comes at an initial and ongoing cost though. In some cases it can make good sense (like charging one EV battery pack while driving on the other, as EV's are the cause of the usage spike anyway in this discussion and can take a while to recharge).

In other cases it is a one size fits all solution, and leakage and other losses come into play on a much larger scale.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 02:23 PM   #127 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Only problem is all the major water pumpers I know opted not to have their rates lowered in exchange for cutting power to their pumps during peak demand.
Problem is on consecutive 100'F+ degree days is when they need water most, pumps run 24hrs or stuff starts dieing.
May be more of a problem with what they're growing. Hereabouts it seemed quite welcome, because any sensible farmer would be irrigating at night anyway, since temperatures drop to the low 60s/high 50s in midsummer, which in turn means that scarce water they're spraying on the fields doesn't evaporate before it soaks in deep enough to get to the plant roots.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
NeilBlanchard (07-06-2013), UFO (07-15-2013)
Old 07-06-2013, 02:29 PM   #128 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamIan View Post
Most places around the country have time periods when the demand actually dips bellow the minimum base load of the utilities facilities ... some of them don't just turn on and off ... so some of them just waste fuel and throw away the base load that is beyond the current real time demand.

A smarter grid has less of that waste.
Sure. Now imagine an EV/PHEV that is smart enough to know (maybe because you tell it?) how much you plan to drive tomorrow, and if energy is expensive, only charges enough to get you there. Or looks at forecast weather, sees it's going to be sunny tomorrow, and knows you can recharge at work with the excess PV generation.

Or how about an A/C system that has a lot of built-in thermal mass, which is chilled when there is excess generation, and used for cooling later on?

There are a whole lot of problems like this, which can be solved fairly simply with imagination and a bit of silicon.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to jamesqf For This Useful Post:
Occasionally6 (07-07-2013)
Old 07-06-2013, 02:57 PM   #129 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by IamIan View Post
Or Option C , you didn't include ... storage of excess production during those times when demand reduces on its own ... no mandated less demand required ... no increased production required.
Grid power storage is a bad idea, you instantly lose up to 10% to 30% of the power you are trying to store by storing it up and releasing it.
Over on wind-sun.com they claim the typical off grid PV to lead acid to ACpower setup as being around 67% efficient by the time the power gets used in your home.
So how do you get more power out of a system by adding on a new system that has automatic losses of up to 30%?

Normally you think batteries are the obvious answer only problem is they have limited life spans and when they go bad you have tons of lead, nickel or lovely cadmium to deal with. The amounts of metal needed would be in the millions of tons tons range. It takes around 50lbs of lead just to hold 1KWH of useable power in a lead acid battery. Lead is the most likely candidate for battery storage.
If you are going to use Nickel based chemistry then you might as well forget about building a whole lot of electric and hybrid car batteries.

If the smart grid uses batteries or some other means to store power its going to be even less efficient and cost more than what we have now.
It sounds like the smart grid has a huge potential to increase wastes of all different kinds.

The only grid storage that has good potential is the one we have been using for years already. Its safe, there are no toxic metals involved and makes up over 99% of grid storage capacity already. Its called pumped hydroelectric storage. Only problem is it doesn't work every where.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2013, 03:49 PM   #130 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: San Diego, California
Posts: 982
Thanks: 271
Thanked 385 Times in 259 Posts
It may be a bad idea in some instances . . .

Quote:
Originally Posted by oil pan 4 View Post
Grid power storage is a bad idea, you instantly lose up to 10% to 30% of the power you are trying to store by storing it up and releasing it.
Over on wind-sun.com they claim the typical off grid PV to lead acid to ACpower setup as being around 67% efficient by the time the power gets used in your home.
So how do you get more power out of a system by adding on a new system that has automatic losses of up to 30%?

Normally you think batteries are the obvious answer only problem is they have limited life spans and when they go bad you have tons of lead, nickel or lovely cadmium to deal with. The amounts of metal needed would be in the millions of tons tons range. It takes around 50lbs of lead just to hold 1KWH of useable power in a lead acid battery. Lead is the most likely candidate for battery storage.
If you are going to use Nickel based chemistry then you might as well forget about building a whole lot of electric and hybrid car batteries.

If the smart grid uses batteries or some other means to store power its going to be even less efficient and cost more than what we have now.
It sounds like the smart grid has a huge potential to increase wastes of all different kinds.

The only grid storage that has good potential is the one we have been using for years already. Its safe, there are no toxic metals involved and makes up over 99% of grid storage capacity already. Its called pumped hydroelectric storage. Only problem is it doesn't work every where.
. . . and a great idea in others.

I have an associate who works for Southern California Edison Gas & Electric (SCEGE) Eastern. Over dinner, he described the ongoing retrofit of one of their power plants from two large oil-fired steam generators to 4 combined cycle gas fired generators. The 1000+ MW production capability was not just the only advantage, but the ability to more easily match load with production as the new turbines could be stopped and started in about 30 minutes compared to the old steam units which took hours. He mentioned how in the day, they would dump excess electricity into resistive loads to balance the minimum output of the steam generators. Now, he says, they rarely dump their excess but simply put it on the grid so the night time industries out in the Los Angeles Basin can more easily balance their loads. Because they also give PM electrical discounts, many commercial industries have taken advantage and run night shifts.

This has been brought about because of the so called "smart grid". Local capacity is more easily diffused into the surrounding areas.

Electric vehicle charging at night would be welcome because it just means overcapacity is used.

When asked about local storage of overcapacity, he mentioned the overriding thing is going to be cost. The operators have to look at capital payback and profits of course. Efficiency is less of a concern as the energy is often wasted anyways. Reducing, then selling that "waste" energy has been their thrust.

When asked about using old EV packs as overcapacity storage, he said the large variability in design, voltage and capacity would probably prove a nightmare to integrate into the power grid. It simply would cost too much. However, some local entrepreneurs were thinking of buying up used Prius packs and charging them at night rates and selling quick charge services at a premium price during daytime loads. They also wanted to be able to sell back to the grid during peak hours but operators only buy back at the reduced rates, so there would be no profit as of the moment. That may change in the future.

The recycling of battery chemistry as an aside, excess load storage can be workable if costs are low enough to tempt the power producers to use them.

  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to RustyLugNut For This Useful Post:
Frank Lee (07-06-2013), IamIan (07-06-2013), UFO (07-15-2013)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com