Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Fossil Fuel Free
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2013, 07:12 AM   #221 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 47.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
I think an EV trailer would be of little use if it can extend the range only some 60 miles.
A Tesla S can do 200 miles by itself. Why build a trailer with less than that capacity?

If the pack would be that light you don't need a trailer at all and just have it in the car (the other option for EV mild range extension).

By the time you've done over 200 miles you'd really need to stop and rest somewhere. Only the bluntest of car journalists would not take the opportunity to fill the packs.
Sure, there are not that many quick charging points yet. You may have to plan ahead or make do with slow charging 110V (even though you can charge both packs at the same time). It may be slightly cumbersome, but not prohibitive. Not for us hypermilers anyway

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-16-2013, 07:28 AM   #222 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
I think an EV trailer would be of little use if it can extend the range only some 60 miles. A Tesla S can do 200 miles by itself. Why build a trailer with less than that capacity?
60 miles one way. I probably want to be able to come home again without charging if possible. Besides, I don't want to put Tesla-level money into it.

Quote:
If the pack would be that light you don't need a trailer at all and just have it in the car (the other option for EV mild range extension).
What if my EV is a bike and doesn't have the volume or weight capacity on board? P.S. Or what if I know when I set out that I'm only running around town- I can go out with a "local" sized batt pack and save the weight and volume (equals more efficient stop and start driving). When I know I want more capacity I can add it as desired.

Quote:
By the time you've done over 200 miles you'd really need to stop and rest somewhere. Only the bluntest of car journalists would not take the opportunity to fill the packs.
Sure, there are not that many quick charging points yet. You may have to plan ahead or make do with slow charging 110V (even though you can charge both packs at the same time). It may be slightly cumbersome, but not prohibitive. Not for us hypermilers anyway
Yeah, I make brief gas or potty stops, sometimes even stops just to stretch. But they last about 10 minutes. Ten minutes of charge time for my EV is just about nothing i.e. useless. However if I stop at a casino I could wall-charge for an hour, maybe more. That still does virtually nothing for the energy needed to complete the trip although I would gladly bank the "free" energy.
__________________



Last edited by Frank Lee; 07-16-2013 at 07:58 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 08:16 AM   #223 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 47.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
60 miles one way. I probably want to be able to come home again without charging if possible. Besides, I don't want to put Tesla-level money into it.
You want it to be cheap and have big range? It may be cheap in use but sure, capacity of current batteries means a big potent pack is not cheap, though it won't even come close to Tesla money.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
What if my EV is a bike and doesn't have the volume or weight capacity on board?
Yeah, what if you dropped the Boxer engine and stuff from the Wing and convert it to EV? You could have at least 150 kilos of LiFePo's on that and have a fantastic range. Or 150 kilo's of cheap lead acid and a range that sucks. Or not bother with EV for that at all and just admire the boxer sound and power. It is up to you.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
P.S. Or what if I know when I set out that I'm only running around town- I can go out with a "local" sized batt pack and save the weight and volume (equals more efficient stop and start driving). When I know I want more capacity I can add it as desired via trailer.
Why, like the trailer or generator you'd leave the extra pack home or at the rental service? Bolting it in would not be smart unless you need the extra range most of the time.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Yeah, I make brief gas or potty stops, sometimes even stops just to stretch. But they last about 10 minutes. Ten minutes of charge time for my EV is just about nothing i.e. useless. However if I stop at a casino I could wall-charge for an hour, maybe more. That still does virtually nothing for the energy needed to complete the trip although I would gladly bank the "free" energy.
For you this would not work then, but I prefer to rest half an hour after 2 hours of driving. That would not give enough charge time to top it off, but will extend the range beyond the next stop (I'd plan my trip around quick charging points of course).

A net of pack swapping points would solve this of course. For that the EV needs to become more common than today.
In the early days of motoring if you ran empty somewhere you'd have to visit a drug store to buy a couple of bottles of gasoline. When cars became more common filling stations emerged. And so eventually will EV related services.
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 12:54 PM   #224 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
The Tesla Model S can go ~265 miles on a single charge. It uses ~380Wh/mile. The EV1 was capable of <160Wh/mile so if it had an 85kWh pack, it would have 2.375X more range - about 625 miles!

I think that <100Wh/mile is quite possible in a optimized high efficiency car - like what I am trying to do with CarBEN EV5. The Stella solar car can travel at 40-60Wh/mile so it has ~370 mile range on just a 15kWh battery pack. That puts a ~590 miles range on a Leaf's 24kWh pack.

So, with an efficient low drag car, a hybrid set up is moot.
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 01:33 PM   #225 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
P-hack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: USA
Posts: 1,408

awesomer - '04 Toyota prius
Thanks: 102
Thanked 252 Times in 204 Posts
The main problem in this discussion (semi-hijack) is that we aren't looking at a typical situation, that somehow the range extender (which is pre-determined once you leave your driveway) is still malleable, so that leads to a lot of confusion about somehow the generator being more efficient. The efficiency of the gas generator depends on load and you have to pick a scenario, the 5 speed (or efficiency optimized cvt) can adapt in the hands of a capable driver who knows a thing or two about bsfc and hypermiling and situational awareness.

Pick a scenario (i.e. driving 1000 miles a few times a year), select the components for your generator system with known losses under various loads/speeds and lets compare efficiency (and cost if you like).

Consider also that lots of range extended miles offsets a higher initial cost of a range extender to a degree, but the efficiency becomes even more critical in terms of dollars with lots of miles too.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to P-hack For This Useful Post:
IamIan (07-16-2013)
Old 07-16-2013, 01:58 PM   #226 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,594

RippinRoo - '05 Subaru Legacy Wagon 2.5 GT
Subaru
90 day: 21.16 mpg (US)

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

Olga - '03 Volkswagen Jetta Wagon
90 day: 46.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 303
Thanked 311 Times in 186 Posts
Well, I did some research (not knowing much about controller, motor, etc efficiencies) and came up with something that I originally thought would bolster the position of the genset trailer approach, but then I checked my maths and discovered a major flaw in my thinking...

I'll summarize what I learned here for the benefit of others (sorry Frank; this will be a long one!).

EV Details:
The EV I picked as the representative travel vehicle is the 2013 Nissan Leaf with the optional 6.6kW charger. It's not the most efficient commercial EV out there, nor the least. I have no idea if a Nissan Leaf would be able to tow anything, but for the sake of this discussion, let's assume that it does have the ability to tow whatever we decide to put behind it for the range extender.

Official (aka EPA) specs for the 2013 Nissan Leaf are 102 MPGe highway (consuming 33kWH/100 miles or 0.33kWH/mile) and 129 MPGe city (consuming 26kWH/100 miles or 0.26kWH/mile) (see Compare Side-by-Side) The MPGe figure takes into account all the losses from the wall plug to the wheels (see Miles per gallon gasoline equivalent - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia), so I don't have to know the details of the charger, controller, motor, etc. efficiencies. Stated range with a full charge is about 75 miles at 65mph.

(Some more info on the Leaf: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nissan_Leaf)

We all know that the EPA testing protocols don't reflect real world driving as well as we'd like, so I also looked for real user's consumption and found data for the earlier (and less efficient) 2012 Leaf... surprisingly, at a steady-state 65mph cruise, users tended to achieve even lower consumption... 0.278kWH/mile (My Nissan Leaf Forum - Range Chart) and even as low as 0.25kWH/mile. Of course, this assumes a battery pack with no degradation. So we could assume a worst case of 0.33kWH/mile for the consumption.

I don't know what the impact on EV efficiency would be by pulling a trailer, so I didn't take that into account. For my end conclusion, it doesn't matter anyway.

Pusher details:
For the pusher, I assumed it would be a relatively modern TDI as was implied, for instance a Mk4 Golf or Jetta front end with the ALH TDI, with no specific engine modifications other than obvious ones such as removing the power steering pump and AC pulley and potentially replacing the alternator with another that has higher output. I'm assuming this just so we can use known data rather than guessing at how the engine modifications would change the output.

I picked the ALH just because I am somewhat familiar with it; there may be newer TDIs that are more efficient, but it's hard to tell since the newer cars seem to have worse FE... I know some of that is due to the updated emmissions equipment and some is due to the higher weight of the newer cars.

Given a Mk4 front end as the pusher power source, I believe that limits the transimission choices to either a 5MT or an auto transmission. I suppose it would be possible to fab up an adapter in order to attach a DSG or even a CVT to the engine, along with whatever work is needed to also control those adaptations, but for me this level of modification is beyond what I imagine to be reasonable. Let's assume that it's possible to at least fab up a way to control the 5MT from the EV cabin, maybe using only the top gear to reduce the complexity, and the EV itself would take care of getting the combination up to the speed necessary to engage the gear on the pusher.

Let's also assume that the 5th gear has been swapped so that the engine runs at (or very near) an optimal RPM when it happens to get loaded (e.g. pushing up a grade) at 65mph.

For a stock ALH TDI Golf driving at 65mph, 55MPG is achievable (according to MPG at MPH chart - TDIClub Forums). This comes out to 1.18gph fuel consumption for steady state cruise (not accounting for acceleration or up-grade pushing). With my assumptions, the 5th gear ratio has been optimized for 65mph steady state but we've also added a trailer which likely will increase the aero and rolling drag, so it's probably a wash. Potentially the driver can actively P&G as well as EOC the pusher, maybe averaging as high as 0.93gph (aka 70mpg at 65mph) for the combination of EV and trailer.

As with the MPGe figure, the MPG (and the derived gph) figure takes into account all the losses from the fuel that has been pumped into the tank to the wheels turning on the pavement.

Genset details:
Knowing that the maximum charge that the Leaf can take is 6.6kW, I will assume the genset would be sized appropriately for that. Gensets are rated at gph at a particular load, which (just like MPGe and MPG) takes into account all the losses of the unit from tank to kW output.

As an example, the Isuzu 8kW diesel generator (see http://www.generatorsales.com/order/...asp?page=800TS) is sized to provide 8kW continuous, 240V @ 33 Amps, and under max load consumes 0.82gph. The Nissan Leaf (as mentioned) will take up to 6.6kW, 240V @ 27.5 Amps, which is easily within the capabilities of the generator. In fact, at max battery charging, the Leaf is only using 82.5% of the generators max load, and so the generator only uses 0.68gph (according to the chart given at the link, the fuel use appears to be linear between full load and 3/4 load).

Proof that the genset is more efficient!
"Ah ha!" I thought. An hourly consumption of 0.68gal is clearly better than an hourly consumption of 0.93gal! See, genset wins!!

But wait...
Then I checked my maths...

If the Leaf is consuming a worst case of 0.33kWH/mile at 65mph, then in one hour of travel, it would consume 21.45kWH. Best possible case of 0.25kWH/mile (which is probably not realistic with a trailer) means a consumption of 16.25kWH each hour. Ack! The genset can only replenish 6.6kWH each hour, max! So while the genset does have the ability to extend the range of the EV, it's not going to extend it enough to make a 600 or 800 mile trip feasible. The BEST possible range, assuming the BEST possible consumption figures is about 124 miles before the battery pack is down to 10% at which point the driver must stop in order to recharge to avoid hurting the battery pack (assumptions: 24kWH non-degraded battery pack, 0.25kWH/mile consumption, 6.6kW constant charging while driving). Worst case is (at 0.33kWH/mile) is about 88 miles.

So even in the best possible case, the genset will only allow about 2 hours of driving (vs 1 hour without the extender) at which point you'd have to stop and recharge. The 6.6kW charger can charge to full in about 4 hours, or if a DC "Fast Charger" happens to be available along your route, you could recharge in about 30 minutes. However, the DC Fast Charger (rated at 60kW!!) will end up degrading the battery pack faster, plus they are pretty hard to find (as I understand it) so I wouldn't consider that to be a viable option.

I suppose you could also do a 60kW genset to replicate the Fast Charger, but a genset of that capability would be freakin' expensive, heavy, and obviously would consume a great deal more gph. Even an efficient one (such as this one: http://www.generatorsales.com/order/...page=Perkins60), which is set to only run 20 minutes an hour (to quickly top up the battery pack) would consume 1.14gph, but it's over 2,000 lbs all by itself, not considering a trailer that would have to support that weight... probably not a realistic option.

Another approach is to slow down so that the EV doesn't consume quite as much per hour as it does at 65mph. But of course that can be done with the pusher as well, and while the 6.6kW genset consumes a steady 0.68gph regardless of the speed the EV drives, the pusher consumption improves rapidly the slower it is driven... for example, at worst case for a stock Mk4 Golf with the TDI ALH (per the chart linked above), it should be possible to get about 72mpg at 45mph... that gives 0.625gph... already better than the genset. Yet at 45mph, with the genset range extender, the range would only increase to ~200 miles (about 4 1/2 hours of driving) before requiring a recharge.

Conclusion:
I still agree it's all situational, but after looking at these numbers, I think the situations where a genset makes sense compared to a pusher (with all else being equal) have shrunk down to effectively none from my perspective. If I'm going on a 600, 800, or even 1000 mile trip, I certainly do not want to stop every 2 hours in order to wait 4 hours for a full recharge. Nor do I want to deal with finding the Fast Charger "needle in the haystack" (which may or may not be anywhere near my route, or spaced where I want along my route) to do the 30 minute charge. Nor do I want to attempt to drive the entire way at 45mph or less.

Of course, "in the real world", I wouldn't try to drive an EV that kind of distance, regardless of any range extending options. I'll just take my trusty TDI, which gives me about 65 - 70MPG steady state cruising at 60mph (0.92 - 0.86gph) and be happy with that.

Disclaimer:
Your situation may vary.

Last edited by NachtRitter; 07-16-2013 at 02:07 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to NachtRitter For This Useful Post:
IamIan (07-16-2013), Pawtuckett (07-16-2013), redpoint5 (07-16-2013)
Old 07-16-2013, 03:00 PM   #227 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 47.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
It may just be me, but somehow I feel the Tesla Model S would fit my needs better than the Leaf.
I'll go to Germany this weekend; 1200 km in 3 days. The Tesla could do that easily, just needs to be charged overnight. The Leaf; no chance whatsoever.
But I'll take the hybrid. Unlike the Tesla it could do 400 km in Germany in one go at 180 km/h. But only if I can control the urge to hypermile
__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 07-16-2013 at 03:06 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2013, 05:57 PM   #228 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
IamIan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: RI
Posts: 692
Thanks: 371
Thanked 227 Times in 140 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Now we are talking about controller efficiencies?
Sorry to confused ... controller efficiencies effect system efficiencies that use controllers ... and that is why controller efficiencies were being discussed.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
YMMV.
Exactly the basis that I've been defending.
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 06:01 AM   #229 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,396

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Prius Plug-in - '12 Toyota Prius Plug-in
90 day: 57.64 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,192
Thanked 4,380 Times in 3,354 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by NachtRitter View Post
Well, I did some research...

Of course, "in the real world", I wouldn't try to drive an EV that kind of distance, regardless of any range extending options.
Thanks for laying this to rest with well reasoned numbers.

After seeing the disappointing limits of using a genset range extender, I applied the same method NachtRitter used assuming the efficiency of an EV1, and the battery capacity of the Leaf. Assuming an EV1 consumption rate of 0.166kWH/mile, the Leaf battery capacity of 24kWH, and a maximum recharge rate of 6.6kWH, this theoretical car would travel only 368 miles before completely discharging the battery.

EVs would either need to get to an efficiency of 0.125kWH/mile (2x improvement over the Leaf), or chargers/gensets would need to improve for this to be a practical solution.

I just don't ever see battery electric vehicles becoming economical/practical for long distance trips.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2013, 07:19 AM   #230 (permalink)
Master EcoWalker
 
RedDevil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Nieuwegein, the Netherlands
Posts: 3,998

Red Devil - '11 Honda Insight Elegance
Team Honda
90 day: 47.72 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,711
Thanked 2,245 Times in 1,454 Posts
So we're ditching the genset option because the Leaf's max charge rate is not high enough?
It does not have to charge the battery, right? It just can feed the EV's engine directly.

We accept that converting a car to an ICE pusher trailer with all the controls is feasible.
Circumventing the max 'charge' limitation to match the power used under load should not be harder that that imho. With twice the power generated the problem disappears.
Then the range is limited only by the generator's tank size.

__________________
2011 Honda Insight + HID, LEDs, tiny PV panel, extra brake pad return springs, neutral wheel alignment, 44/42 PSI (air), PHEV light (inop), tightened wheel nut.
lifetime FE over 0.2 Gmeter or 0.13 Mmile.


For confirmation go to people just like you.
For education go to people unlike yourself.

Last edited by RedDevil; 07-18-2013 at 07:27 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com