01-14-2013, 09:48 PM
|
#101 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
My Scion xA is rated 0-60 mph in 9.3 seconds. I have *never* needed to go that quick, ever. ~103HP 1.5L in a 2,530 pounds (or so). The Elio will be quicker, and it will get significantly better MPG.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to NeilBlanchard For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-14-2013, 10:30 PM
|
#102 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: harrisburg pa
Posts: 121
Thanks: 5
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
I know my math is weak but I don't know how 9.6 is faster than 9.3. Elio will be quicker! I'm thinking Triumph Rocket 3 engine in keeping with the 3 cyl format. Using the 0-60 calculator at 140 hp and 950 lbs - magic 3.5 sec.
After doing some plug and play into the 0-60 calculator I've got to assume that the slow 0-60 in the Elio is due to gearing. The other possibility is that the engine is a torque-less wonder. Maybe it is an old Lotus engine?
__________________
With my Wrangler I average 40 mpg. Triumph Speedmaster 60 mpg + Jeep 20 mpg = 40 mpg!
Last edited by doclees; 01-15-2013 at 12:18 AM..
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 11:33 AM
|
#103 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
I got my numbers crossed - I was remembering 8.9 second for the Elio. My mistake.
But I don't think 9.6 seconds is too slow, really -- it is plenty quick. And it gets 84MPG on the highway!
We'll find out the real world performance if and when the start selling the Elio. I don't think people will pass it up because it is "slow".
If you want quick - go electric.
|
|
|
01-15-2013, 01:22 PM
|
#104 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: harrisburg pa
Posts: 121
Thanks: 5
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
I don't think I would consider it slow, just average. I have hi hopes for this thing. Its a cheap starting point with the possibility to make it more the way the buyer wants it. There are no perfect vehicles yet. But some real nice beginning platforms .
__________________
With my Wrangler I average 40 mpg. Triumph Speedmaster 60 mpg + Jeep 20 mpg = 40 mpg!
|
|
|
01-25-2013, 02:30 AM
|
#105 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
It doesn't seem slow.
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 12:47 PM
|
#106 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 03:49 PM
|
#107 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,733
Thanks: 8,157
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
|
Those upper A-arms are at about 45°. That's a lot of camber change on deflection.
|
|
|
01-28-2013, 11:23 PM
|
#108 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
|
You're right, they are a bit extreme. Maybe this is how they are keeping it stable in hard cornering?
|
|
|
01-29-2013, 12:24 AM
|
#109 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: harrisburg pa
Posts: 121
Thanks: 5
Thanked 10 Times in 7 Posts
|
Seems that there is something embarrassing under the hood and in the cabbin since they haven't shown them. So maybe polar bear covered seats and child labor under the hood? Eh, at $6800 I don't care.
__________________
With my Wrangler I average 40 mpg. Triumph Speedmaster 60 mpg + Jeep 20 mpg = 40 mpg!
|
|
|
01-29-2013, 12:50 AM
|
#110 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 625
Thanks: 40
Thanked 156 Times in 103 Posts
|
Docless- In response to your question about the interior:
__________________
Aerospace Controls Engineer.
Currently driving a mostly stock 2014 Mitsubishi Mirage DE hatchback.
|
|
|
|