Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-14-2009, 02:33 PM   #11 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arragonis View Post
The trade-off can be difficult to calculate though. If I coast in gear then I use no fuel and with long gearing (30mph / 1000rpm - 6sp Diesel) I can coast for a long time and my MPG reads at infinity. If I coast out of gear I can go slightly further but then engine is burning fuel to keep going and MPG depends on speed, can be between 40-65.

I'm interested in working out whether its better to accelerate more strongly uphill that try to cruise for longer at a lower throttle, and also whether its better to be in a lower gear (less effort but more RPM) vs a higher one. My experimentation so far has not been conclusive.

(All figures Imperial)
It's better to not accelerate uphill at all, at least the way I see it, unless you can't reach your BSFC peak on a flat. Accelerating, regardless of terrain, should be done in the BSFC peak of your engine setup, for the most efficient fuel use per HP production.

In my case, I try my damned hardest not to accelerate on hills at all. Takes too much pedal, and I drive an auto.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-14-2009, 04:53 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: England
Posts: 10

Yamaha - '83 Yamaha MJ50 Towny
90 day: 95.51 mpg (US)

Charlie - '87 Reliant Rialto SE
90 day: 50.72 mpg (US)

Van2 - '99 Peugeot Expert
90 day: 40.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Do carburettor engines use fuel when engine braking?
If I understand how carbs work correctly, they work by sucking air through, so if I'm engine braking, does it suck more fuel into the mix or is there a little tap thing to cut it off?
Or have I got it all wrong? I wouldn't be surprised.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 05:02 PM   #13 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Carb'd engines do in fact suck in fuel while engine braking. There are ways to fix this, but no OEM carb that I've seen employs them. The problem with fixing the fuel flow so that DFCO is available is that idle becomes a compromised item. The idea is to introduce a "hat" to the fuel needle when the throttle valve is closed completely, so that some air still gets in, but no fuel enters the stream, as the air doesn't make contact with the fuel needle to draw it out. This interferes with airflow characteristics, as well, and without an on-demand injection system to keep idle, probably wouldn't work too well. The other way that I've seen/thought about to do it, would be to literally cut fuel flow manually by means of a fuel choke in the carb bowl that caps off the fuel jet or the bowl vent. It's not fool proof, but it just might work enough to say so, and won't affect idle or other airflow considerations, only bowl capacity.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Christ For This Useful Post:
gltux (11-14-2009)
Old 11-14-2009, 08:07 PM   #14 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
It's better to not accelerate uphill at all, at least the way I see it, unless you can't reach your BSFC peak on a flat. Accelerating, regardless of terrain, should be done in the BSFC peak of your engine setup, for the most efficient fuel use per HP production.

In my case, I try my damned hardest not to accelerate on hills at all. Takes too much pedal, and I drive an auto.
Thanks for the reply.

My quandry (and maybe I should start a new thread rather than take this one to Cuba) is that holding pace uphill in the same gear takes much longer at lower MPG (say around 25-30), but a quick burst in a lower gear takes it down to 20 but only for about 20% of the time and then I can coast for the rest of the way. I have yet to work out which is the better overall.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 08:15 PM   #15 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Portland OR
Posts: 204
Thanks: 1
Thanked 30 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Christ View Post
Carb'd engines do in fact suck in fuel while engine braking. There are ways to fix this, but no OEM carb that I've seen employs them. The problem with fixing the fuel flow so that DFCO is available is that idle becomes a compromised item. The idea is to introduce a "hat" to the fuel needle when the throttle valve is closed completely, so that some air still gets in, but no fuel enters the stream, as the air doesn't make contact with the fuel needle to draw it out. This interferes with airflow characteristics, as well, and without an on-demand injection system to keep idle, probably wouldn't work too well. The other way that I've seen/thought about to do it, would be to literally cut fuel flow manually by means of a fuel choke in the carb bowl that caps off the fuel jet or the bowl vent. It's not fool proof, but it just might work enough to say so, and won't affect idle or other airflow considerations, only bowl capacity.
Some German cars from the 80's with webber carbs had fuel cut solenoids, they would close the main when the throttle was closed and vacuum went high enough. they worked great til they didn't.... The solenoids would stick or malfunction... Something I'm sure material tech would fix now...

Dave
__________________
If it has a motor its worth playing with.......
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 09:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
I guess it would really depend on how much your MPG drops and how much faster you're going to end up going. Regardless, acceleration requires more than steady state speed does, making it quite obvious that there probably aren't very many scenarios where acceleration uphill would be beneficial. Of course, we've not defined "hill" in this scenario, either.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 10:26 PM   #17 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: maine
Posts: 758

oldscoob - '87 subaru wagon gl/dr
90 day: 47.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 21
Thanked 18 Times in 14 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by dan765 View Post
I'm confused on this. It seems to me that since the engine spins faster while braking, then it is burning more fuel, so how is it more efficient?
throttle closed has air bypass open on injected. the last of the carbs attempted crazy ways to do this, but it is not efficient. it is insanity with an egr valve.

I still avoid engine brake in carb vehicles...and the egr valve may become an air valve sometime, I have been pondering experiments for years.

for injecteds, the engine brake will never be strong because of air valve, but like a rig, at heavy load it is only 5% helper, or wherever a car may be in weight and engine size. still worth choosing and making easy to drive stick shift.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 10:37 AM   #18 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
You could simply close off your carburetor's idle circuit. There's a handy needle valve (aka idle adjustment screw) to do it. Once done, your car would not only shut off when going down hills, it would also shut off automatically at stop signs and stoplights, just like the hybrids.

Of course, there are the minor problems that many times you want to have the engine idling, and you'll waste a lot of gas starting up at high rpms.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-15-2009, 04:18 PM   #19 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Many Mopeds can be setup like that, as well... so you have to pedal to start it every time you come to a stop, and if you get moving too slow, you clutch it and the engine stalls.

__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine braking and stop lights Piwoslaw Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 73 07-28-2024 01:18 PM
Restore oil additive... suspectnumber961 The Unicorn Corral 46 11-20-2018 01:15 AM
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 38 02-04-2010 11:35 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com