Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-06-2009, 12:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Engine Braking

I'm confused on this. It seems to me that since the engine spins faster while braking, then it is burning more fuel, so how is it more efficient?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-06-2009, 01:44 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
Modern engines don't inject fuel while decelerating in gear.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 01:50 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
ohhh i see. Thats interesting.
So pretty much the engine is turning but no fuel is being burnt?
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-06-2009, 02:11 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572

Big Salsa - '04 Toyota Sienna LE

Silver - '10 Toyota Prius III
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
Yes, but the engine turning is slowing your vehicle down... so it is better than using your breakpads to slow down, but you don't coast as long as if you were coasting in gear.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:12 PM   #5 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
I see it repeated all the time, I am curious why engine braking is better than using the pads? I definitely understand the concept on long hills where the pads will heat but for normal driving around town? Brake pads for a car are pretty cheap and easy to replace.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123

The Geo - '93 Geo Metro
Team Metro
90 day: 45.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
Most cars don't use gas when the engine is doing the braking. The clutch pad doesn't get too much heat from friction when engine braking either. The BEST way to slow down, is EOC to stop.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 01:39 PM   #7 (permalink)
Smeghead
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: South Central AK
Posts: 933

escort - '99 ford escort sport
90 day: 42.38 mpg (US)

scoobaru - '02 Subaru Forester s
90 day: 28.65 mpg (US)
Thanks: 32
Thanked 146 Times in 97 Posts
Agreed that best is EOC to stop. The clutch pad should not be getting any heat from friction while engine braking, as it should not be slipping (especially as it has less force on it than when under heavy acceleration)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-07-2009, 02:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Engine braking is better than using your brakes because your engine doesn't turn into dust.

There is a huge problem with brake dust on roads in California, because people think they should stomp on the gas, then stomp on the brake just as hard, instead of attempting to smoothly flow through traffic. It leaves brake dust on the roads, which in turn gets washed into water sources, asbestos and all. (Not that newer pads have asbestos in them, I don't think.)
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 10:08 AM   #9 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by wyatt View Post
Yes, but the engine turning is slowing your vehicle down... so it is better than using your breakpads to slow down, but you don't coast as long as if you were coasting in gear.
The trade-off can be difficult to calculate though. If I coast in gear then I use no fuel and with long gearing (30mph / 1000rpm - 6sp Diesel) I can coast for a long time and my MPG reads at infinity. If I coast out of gear I can go slightly further but then engine is burning fuel to keep going and MPG depends on speed, can be between 40-65.

I'm interested in working out whether its better to accelerate more strongly uphill that try to cruise for longer at a lower throttle, and also whether its better to be in a lower gear (less effort but more RPM) vs a higher one. My experimentation so far has not been conclusive.

(All figures Imperial)
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-14-2009, 01:18 PM   #10 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
If you're braking in neutral, the engine is idling and burning gas.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Restore oil additive... suspectnumber961 The Unicorn Corral 46 11-20-2018 12:15 AM
Engine braking and stop lights Piwoslaw Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 72 06-22-2010 06:44 PM
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 38 02-04-2010 10:35 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com