Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

View Poll Results: What engine for a 1990 CRX?
Re-build the stock engine yourself. 1 11.11%
Pay someone to rebuild the stock engine. 1 11.11%
Swap an HF drivetrain in. 0 0%
Later D16Z6 engine. 1 11.11%
Swap in the lean-burn HX engine. 6 66.67%
B-16 swap; 160 HP and 111 lb-ft of torque. 0 0%
B18A (Integra LS) swap; 130-140 HP and good torque; taller gearing. 0 0%
Integra GSR (B18C) motor, bec ause 180+ HP and short gearing is good. 0 0%
Voters: 9. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2011, 07:35 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Engine options for a CRX

The Used Oil Analysis for my CRX came back with bad news. Some lead, like last time, but more of it. Plus copper, which is probably from the backing of the bearings. Which means I need to fix or replace the engine relatively soon.

Since it's a 1990 CRX, I have about a zillion options for what I can do. Some swaps (like those from a car earlier than 1990) are out, but that still leaves most of the D- and B-series engines as swap candidates. Or, of course, I could try to rebuild the stock engine myself.

Simpler swaps are better in general than complex ones, but there are certainly interesting possibilities that are complex.

So, what would you do if it was you?

[Trying to set up a poll.]

-soD

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-17-2011, 08:21 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: dorchester,sc
Posts: 58
Thanks: 16
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
would you please elaborate on your used oil analysis for those of us that don't know?
__________________
Your only as good as your last mistake
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 08:23 PM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: dorchester,sc
Posts: 58
Thanks: 16
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
I can't belive I got the first vote, I'm reminded of he that is without sin cast the first stone.
__________________
Your only as good as your last mistake
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 09:18 PM   #4 (permalink)
Diesel Addict/No Cure
 
cleanspeed1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: chicago, il
Posts: 787

StolenHoopty - '90 Honda Accord EX

HvyDrnkr - '93 Cadillac Seville
Thanks: 130
Thanked 74 Times in 49 Posts
Go lean burn.................with a intercooled turbo!
__________________
Volvo WIA42 VED-12 / 335 hp / 1300 ft/lbs / 9 mpg

Big n' Boxy, Never met a Hill it Didn't Like
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 09:18 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Elmore, Oh
Posts: 44

Hybrid Pancake - '03 Honda Civic Hybrid
Team Honda
90 day: 56.01 mpg (US)
Thanks: 20
Thanked 15 Times in 8 Posts
What about an electric conversion?
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2011, 10:30 PM   #6 (permalink)
Moderate your Moderation.
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Troy, Pa.
Posts: 8,919

Pasta - '96 Volkswagen Passat TDi
90 day: 45.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,369
Thanked 430 Times in 353 Posts
Diesel. A mechanical injection diesel will be a really easy swap, you just have to male an engine mount and adapter plate.

If you use a vw engine, you need a rwd/scirocco clutch set/flywheel, and you stick the civic friction disc between them.
__________________
"¿ʞɐǝɹɟ ɐ ǝɹ,noʎ uǝɥʍ 'ʇı ʇ,usı 'ʎlǝuol s,ʇı"

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2011, 12:05 AM   #7 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If it ain't knocking or smoking, take care of it and keep running it. It might go for a long time yet.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2011, 11:21 AM   #8 (permalink)
Enthusiast
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Lake Elmo, MN
Posts: 109
Thanks: 2
Thanked 27 Times in 21 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by some_other_dave View Post
The Used Oil Analysis for my CRX came back with bad news. Some lead, like last time, but more of it. Plus copper, which is probably from the backing of the bearings. Which means I need to fix or replace the engine relatively soon.

Since it's a 1990 CRX, I have about a zillion options for what I can do. Some swaps (like those from a car earlier than 1990) are out, but that still leaves most of the D- and B-series engines as swap candidates. Or, of course, I could try to rebuild the stock engine myself.

Simpler swaps are better in general than complex ones, but there are certainly interesting possibilities that are complex.

So, what would you do if it was you?

[Trying to set up a poll.]

-soD
Z6 is the cheapest to build and easiest to swap. The car will stay light and efficient and be relatively powerful.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2011, 12:33 AM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by backyard engineer View Post
would you please elaborate on your used oil analysis for those of us that don't know?
On my last several oil changes, I sent the oil (and a check) to the folks at Blackstone Labs. The "comments" section came back as follows:

Quote:
We're not sure how long this oil run was, but the level of wear here is cautionary. Copper and lead are worrisome. Both metals are from the bearings, and typically lead is from the Babbitt coating on the bearings. The fact that you're getting copper may indicate that the Babbitt is worn through. Also note an increased level of upper-end wear (aluminum from pistons and chrome from rings). Iron is from steel parts. This engine may well have a problem. Silicon could be dirt, and that might be causing wear. A trace of fuel is okay. TBN=2.2.
The "TBN" number is a measurement of how effective or how worn-out the additive package still is.

To give you some idea of how much wear they're showing, the iron levels are 40 times the average for all oil samples. The lead is 12 times the average. The copper is 3 times the average. Chromium is 4 times the average. The levels of all are up quite noticeably from the previous oil changes, as well. (4x as much iron, for example.)

I don't think a diesel swap is in the cards for MB. I'm just not competent to do that much work myself, and I can't think of a shop locally that would try it. Electric swaps are out of the question because I simply do not have a place to plug in! My wife's car gets the garage, and there are no outlets close enough to the street for me to access.

So far, people seem to like the notion of putting a lean-burn engine in and finding a way to make it work. I figured that would be the most popular answer around here.

-soD

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com