04-15-2008, 02:42 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoFodder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Ethanol - why not just ride a horse?
Converting corn into Ethanol, and then burning that ethanol to power cars presents a lot of energy losses.
If we're going to be essentially running our cars on corn why not get rid of the car part and feed that same corn to a horse. Would a horse actually be a more efficient method of converting corn into transportation ability?
From college I remember animals getting about a 15% conversion efficiency of food into motive power, depending upon metabolic rate and environment. Basal metabolic rate also burns up energy, unlike a car which can be turned off, and I'm not sure what a horse's basal metabolic rate is.
But growing food, turning that food into gasoline, and then burning that gasoline in a car seems roundabout compared to nature's solution.
An amusing idea at least, something to make the corn ethanol supporters stop and think a bit perhaps.
__________________
I put the animated icon together in Photoshop, feel free to use it if you like!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 03:03 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Green Rodder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: maywood, new jersey
Posts: 28
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 03:14 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,973 Times in 3,609 Posts
|
Speaking of horses, I came across an interesting factoid about the year the number of automobiles (in the US) overtook the number of horses (kept for riding/work). It was much later than I would have thought. Of course I can't find the reference now, but if I'm not mistaken, it was into the early 1940's.
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 03:51 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoFodder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
How does ethanol production compare to oil production? That stuff doesn't exactly come flying out of the ground and into your tank either.
I'm imagining doing a 700 mile trip by horse... or grocercy shopping... etc. It's not looking like an appealing alternative.
|
Yeah but you can't feed oil to horses. Well, you can, but the horse won't be doing too hot afterwards
Idea wasn't met to be insulting, just (I thought) an amusing observation.
__________________
I put the animated icon together in Photoshop, feel free to use it if you like!
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 04:03 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoFodder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
Speaking of horses, I came across an interesting factoid about the year the number of automobiles (in the US) overtook the number of horses (kept for riding/work). It was much later than I would have thought. Of course I can't find the reference now, but if I'm not mistaken, it was into the early 1940's.
|
That sounds about right. Everyone owning cars would have been really expensive, also cars wouldn't even run on a lot of the roads out there in 1940.
At the start WW2 the Polish army's mobile assets were mostly horse based. Axis powers also employed horses, especially at the beginning of the war.
http://groups.msn.com/2NDUSCAV/ww2germancav.msnw
The Blitzkrieg actually relied to a large degree on horse transport and in some cases cavalry advances! But the actual breakthroughs did rely largely on armored divisions followed by infantry. People who claim that Blitzkrieg is a myth and that the German army was really mostly horse based don't understand Blitzkrieg. The idea of Blitzkrieg is not that your whole army speeds along, rather that you make a fast breakthrough, confuse enemy defenses, consolidate your gains with infantry then rinse and repeat.
You don't see much WW2 footage of horses though because horses were boring and mundane, not the kind of thing you want in a propaganda movie.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee
No insult- question of how energy conversion for oil production vs ethanol is serious. And, I suppose, horse energy conversion as well!
|
None taken . If Ethanol conversion (as well as Canadian tar sands) were driven by nuclear then it would make more CO2 sense, so the source of the energy used in conversion also makes difference.
__________________
I put the animated icon together in Photoshop, feel free to use it if you like!
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 06:47 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Dartmouth 2010
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hanover, NH
Posts: 6,447
Thanks: 92
Thanked 122 Times in 90 Posts
|
If we had horses, then the internet would have to morph into the pony express as it could no longer rely on trucks (but luckily, it's a series of tubes).
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 06:49 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EV OR DIESEL
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 1,758
Thanks: 57
Thanked 113 Times in 86 Posts
|
A) Horses are Expensive (not just feed, purchase it's everything else)
B) Horses are Dangerous I had my arm broken by a horse.
C) I hate horses
Sorry Guys, I just hate them,
Carry on.
__________________
2016 Tesla Model X
2022 Sprinter
Gone 2012 Tesla Model S P85
Gone 2013 Nissan LEAF SV
2012 Nissan LEAF SV
6 speed ALH TDI Swapped in to a 2003 Jetta Wagon
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 07:09 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
MP$
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Ohio
Posts: 595
Thanks: 5
Thanked 19 Times in 14 Posts
|
Horses keep eating when they are not being used. tractors and cars are much more efficient. (quote from my 98 year young neighbor) and then there is the methane and the flies.
I did have a big pony which tried to kill me several times. Fun used to equal danger. But now fun is squeezing the most energy out of fuel.
Last edited by diesel_john; 04-15-2008 at 07:26 PM..
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 07:19 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Future EV Owner
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Sussex Wisconsin
Posts: 674
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_john
Horses keep eating when they are not being used. tractors and cars are much more efficient. and then there is the methane.
|
Depends upon the cost of grass. Plus, horses don't require the same energy resources or infrastructure to produce.
__________________
|
|
|
04-15-2008, 07:23 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,973 Times in 3,609 Posts
|
Oo! Way to sneak in the lifecycle cost-of-production angle.
|
|
|
|