Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2011, 12:23 PM   #1 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Northeast Ohio
Posts: 269

The Wife's Hot Rod - '09 Pontiac G8 GT
Last 3: 23.22 mpg (US)

Big Outback - '13 Subaru Outback 2.5i

Little Outback - '02 Subaru Impreza Outback Sport
Thanks: 0
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Electric clutch for mechanical fan?

I read that electric fans are less efficient at cooling than mechanical fans. Converting motion to electricity & back to motion again.

Has anyone with a mechanical fan thought about making an electric clutch instead of using the thermal clutch? It could use the same controls as a single speed electric fan.

I think you would want to use a light weight fan blade to control the weight & accelleration. I have never taken an AC pump apart to know how much the clutch wieghs, or if the clutch could handle the instant torque it will see.

What are your thoughts?

Don

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-16-2011, 01:27 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
For as much as a radiator fan is on, I'd say electric is fine.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-16-2011, 08:57 PM   #3 (permalink)
500 Mile Metro Traveler
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Sun City, CA
Posts: 183

'89 Dakota LB - blue - '89 Dodge Dakota V6 LE
90 day: 19.8 mpg (US)

'17 Fiat 124 - SunFiat - '17 Fiat 124 Spider Classica
90 day: 30.51 mpg (US)

'89 Metro - The Egg - '89 Geo Metro Base
90 day: 50.71 mpg (US)

'94 Alto - The Box - '94 Suzuki Alto Ce-L
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 13 Times in 10 Posts
the rotating mass of the clutch system and the drag present even when the clutch is disengaged would probably negate any savings one would make from converting an electric fan to an electro-mechanical one as you suggest, since the electric fan operates during a smaller percentage of the operating time.

best bet is to improve air flow over the radiator to the point of not needing to use the fan.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2011, 12:33 AM   #4 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Fans are mostly needed for low speed operations so improving the airflow enough to eliminate the need for them is tough.

That said, my F150 has no fan, but then again it sees virtually no stop-n-go town traffic either.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-13-2011, 10:54 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Building one now

Hi, I have a Toyota Landcruiser which uses 30 litres of LPG to the 100 k's so I am building a remote electric clutch for the existing fan. I am useing an old Ford air con compressor clutch which I believe will handle the torque as these compressors use about 3 to 5 hp and start under full load. My fan although spinning free on 6003 2rs bearings will probably be spinning anyway when engaged as the air flowing past it will most likely turn it. The electric clutch pulls 2 amps and is designed to cycle often. Modern cars disengage this clutch at certain speeds automatically. Steve
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-14-2011, 11:57 AM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: california
Posts: 1,329
Thanks: 24
Thanked 161 Times in 107 Posts
Check out a Mercedes 190e 2.3 or a 90s C220. These cars had a mechanical fan with electric clutch from the factory. There are many others. I replaced mine with a normal puller electric fan because it's more efficient and cheaper to replace. The electric coil is fixed on the water pump behind the fan pulley (doesn't spin).
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-16-2011, 10:03 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Ballarat
Posts: 3
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Thanks looks good, I am setting the cluch up in place of an existing idler pulley and will make provision for it to be locked together mechanically with a couple of set screws in the case of an electrical fault in the clutch whilst in the middle of nowhere.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 01:59 AM   #8 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Since I've totally removed the mechanical fan on my pickup and seen how little the fan is actually needed, I'd vote for a simple electric fan install just for the fact that- at least for my usage patterns- the fan is barely needed at all thus whatever inefficiency penalty there may be from the mech-elec-mech conversion losses is more than offset by the removal of all mechanical fan losses. Now, if there is a usage pattern that requires much more fan use- like on a tractor- I can see where the clutched mechanical fan would be the more efficient choice.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 12:36 PM   #9 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...ah-h-h, but that same "clutch" would work great on an alternator!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-17-2011, 01:22 PM   #10 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Tele man View Post
...ah-h-h, but that same "clutch" would work great on an alternator!
Would it?


__________________


  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com