08-26-2009, 02:04 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
Ford Escort Hypermiler
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: South Coast Massachusetts
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Extended vs regular cab truck
How much difference can I expect to see in MPG with a standard cab vs. an extended cab pickup truck? I know the extended cab is a few hundred pounds heavier, but then I've read that it makes the truck more aerodynamic? What's the verdict?
Thanks.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 05:01 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
As a practical matter, I'd say zero.
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 06:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,272
Thanks: 24,394
Thanked 7,363 Times in 4,763 Posts
|
vs
If automakers provided the CdA for each of their vehicles,that would allow an intelligent appraisal.We presume that an electrical appliance will have a nameplate with voltage,current,frequency,phase,etc. data from which to anticipate performance.Unfortunately,we cannot presume the same for vehicles.------ If your dealer can provide you with the data your in.
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 07:44 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Wannabe greenie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Probably depends on the vehicle too. A 2009 Ford Ranger Supercab is only 14.2 inches longer than the regular cab. I would think that bed length would be more of a factor in Cd.
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 09:02 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Madison AL
Posts: 1,123
Thanks: 30
Thanked 40 Times in 37 Posts
|
Bed length is probably more important.
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 09:40 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Edmonton, AB, Canada
Posts: 531
Thanks: 11
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
|
I use to think it really wouldnt matter much but I have participated in bunch of MPG polls on Ford Truck Enthusiasts and none of the others trucks on there can touch what I get. Admitedly I have the right combination (Reg cab, 2wd, diesel, stick) for MPG but the spread is always more than it should be.
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 09:44 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Wannabe greenie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman
I use to think it really wouldnt matter much but I have participated in bunch of MPG polls on Ford Truck Enthusiasts and none of the others trucks on there can touch what I get. Admitedly I have the right combination (Reg cab, 2wd, diesel, stick) for MPG but the spread is always more than it should be.
|
I think that's more a function of drivers who don't try (or don't know how to try.) I was on an Accord forum earlier today and marveling at people who were excited about getting 25-28 mpg in the same car I regularly get 35-36 mpg in, even with my unusual commute. (I can't even imagine what it would take to get 25 mpg in that car now. 90 mph with the parking brake on?)
|
|
|
08-26-2009, 10:00 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Left Lane Ecodriver
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257
Thanks: 79
Thanked 287 Times in 200 Posts
|
In the city, the few hundred extra lbs is huge, since you'll be spending fuel repeatedly bringing it up to speed. On the highway, extra weight will increase rolling resistance. While fuel consumption is admittedly governed by aerodynamics at high speeds, if every MPG counts, you'll shed weight where you can.
|
|
|
08-27-2009, 12:07 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Duffman
Admitedly I have the right combination (Reg cab, 2wd, diesel, stick) for MPG but the spread is always more than it should be.
|
For the purposes of this thread you have the wrong combination!
X-Cabs will be more aero than standard cabs.
That said, IIRC most pickups are credited with .44-.46ish Cds, while the latest and greatest "fuel economy" versions of full size pickups are claiming about .41. It's something, but it doesn't cause me to dream about huge fe improvements.
|
|
|
|