02-12-2022, 05:25 PM
|
#71 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Just to remind some old-school compact trucks used to be actually compact.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to cRiPpLe_rOoStEr For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
02-13-2022, 10:23 PM
|
#72 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Phillips, WI
Posts: 1,018
Thanks: 192
Thanked 467 Times in 287 Posts
|
The 22 Ford Maverick is being called a compact truck because it is small compared to current full size trucks. It is easy to forget that true compact trucks were being sold in the US back in the 1970's. The 1972 to 1980 Chevrolet Luv was one such truck.
Comparison:
22 Maverick
200" long
73" wide
69" high
72-80 Luv
173" long
63" wide
61" high
In the 1970's, the 22 Maverick would be at least a midsize truck.
__________________
06 Canyon: The vacuum gauge plus wheel covers helped increase summer 2015 mileage to 38.5 MPG, while summer 2016 mileage was 38.6 MPG without the wheel covers. Drove 33,021 miles 2016-2018 at 35.00 MPG.
22 Maverick: Summer 2022 burned 62.74 gallons in 3145.1 miles for 50.1 MPG. Winter 2023-2024 - 2416.7 miles, 58.66 gallons for 41 MPG.
|
|
|
02-14-2022, 12:12 AM
|
#73 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JRMichler
The 22 Ford Maverick is being called a compact truck because it is small compared to current full size trucks. It is easy to forget that true compact trucks were being sold in the US back in the 1970's. The 1972 to 1980 Chevrolet Luv was one such truck.
|
Those LUV numbers were for 2 door short bed versions. The 2 door long bed added in 1981 was 192 inches long or only 8 inches shorter than a Maverick.
My wife's first vehicle was a 1986 Ford Ranger. They varied from 176 inches long to 193 inches long. (No 4 door back then the extended cab had the sideways jump seats)
A Ford F100 at the time varied from 197 (Regular cab / short bed) to 249 inches (4-Door / long bed)
The biggest difference between the 70's and 80's and today is that trucks are expected to be able to transport at least 4 adults.
|
|
|
02-14-2022, 10:13 AM
|
#74 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,436
Thanks: 542
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
Didn't know you could have a long bed and a stretch cab on the same ranger
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
02-14-2022, 03:00 PM
|
#75 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Piotrsko
Didn't know you could have a long bed and a stretch cab on the same ranger
|
You can't, I was mistaken.
The "Supercab" had the 6" short bed not the 7' long bed. I guess it just looked long compared to 4.5 ft bed on the the Nissan Frontier that replaced it.
|
|
|
02-15-2022, 07:48 PM
|
#76 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
The "Supercab" had the 6" short bed not the 7' long bed
|
The early Ranger was not officially available in my country, but I remember the late-'90s model had the 7-feet bed listed as an option for both the regular-cab and Supercab. And even though the Argentinian-made crew-cab had the 6-feet bed listed as an option, I don't remember having ever seen it.
|
|
|
02-17-2022, 05:04 AM
|
#77 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
|
The 2022 Maverick is around 3,665 pounds and the 1975 Luv weighed 2,490.
__________________
"Oh if you use math, reason, and logic you will be hated."--OilPan4
|
|
|
02-17-2022, 03:55 PM
|
#78 (permalink)
|
AKA - Jason
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,603
Thanks: 325
Thanked 2,149 Times in 1,455 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
|
And about 2,000 pounds after a few winters in Michigan.
Growing up in Michigan I never saw a Chevy LUV - didn't know Chevy had a compact truck before the S-10 When I moved South I saw one for the first time I asked my father about them. He confirmed they existed but rusted away to nothing before I was old enough to notice them.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
|
|
02-17-2022, 08:16 PM
|
#79 (permalink)
|
Somewhat crazed
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: 1826 miles WSW of Normal
Posts: 4,436
Thanks: 542
Thanked 1,208 Times in 1,065 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr
The early Ranger was not officially available in my country, but I remember the late-'90s model had the 7-feet bed listed as an option for both the regular-cab and Supercab. And even though the Argentinian-made crew-cab had the 6-feet bed listed as an option, I don't remember having ever seen it.
|
The '90s models became a newer generation frame up: 4 liter motor bigger cab, long bed.
__________________
casual notes from the underground:There are some "experts" out there that in reality don't have a clue as to what they are doing.
|
|
|
02-18-2022, 01:31 AM
|
#80 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,923
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,697 Times in 1,515 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH
Growing up in Michigan I never saw a Chevy LUV - didn't know Chevy had a compact truck before the S-10
|
Odd enough, until some years ago Chevy sold both the Brazilian S10 and some newer generations of the LUV, assembled from CKD kits either in Chile, Ecuador or Colombia according to the model-year.
|
|
|
|