Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 02-16-2008, 02:46 PM   #31 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
metroschultz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Norfolk, Va. USA
Posts: 869

CPT SLO - '93 GEO Metro plainjane
90 day: 53.91 mpg (US)

SilverHairBeauty - '01 Toyota Avalon XL
90 day: 24.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 33 Times in 28 Posts
Send a message via AIM to metroschultz
Thumbs up I didn't know that

Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris D. View Post
You can get stainless flex pipes for far cheaper on ebay..

I thought $26 to my door was pretty cheap as it is.
If i can get it for less I'm always willing to save money.
I'll go look now.
Thanx.
S.

__________________


When you are courting a nice girl an hour seems like a second. When you sit on a red-hot cinder a second seems like an hour. That's relativity.
Albert Einstein
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 02-16-2008, 04:43 PM   #32 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by metroschultz View Post
I know VW has the exhaust come out the back and down the firewall then to a ball coupler then to the rest of the system. maybe if you added a flex in the system just after the ball socket? Hmm? Maybe?
The toilet ball exhaust is usually fine in terms of keeping everything uncracked, but what happens is that people would put a 4 into 2 exhaust from a gas rabbit, since is supposedly flowed better, w/o mounting it to the chassis or using a flex pipe, both of which were things it came from the factory with, so either it or the exhaust would crack.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 02:58 AM   #33 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
VW fixed mine in 81. I wanna fiddle with the timing advance and governor so I figure I might as well replace all the seals and I have a spare pump anyway.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 02:47 PM   #34 (permalink)
yea...I'm THAT guy
 
SL8Brick's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Southeastern, PA
Posts: 21
Thanks: 4
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bruce,
If your goal is clean up the aero profile of the exh system, why not just go with the IPD turbo exhaust kit(or DIY w/FCP exh components)? You'd get rid of the resonator and gain some pipe diameter, all the while staying with OE components. And if you wanted to get even more efficient, you could replace the round OE turbo muffler w/ a strait-through bullet-style muffler. A small diameter bullet muffler could easily be tucked up inside the muffler well behind the rear bumper and covered w/ a louvered undertray.
__________________
1999 Audi A6 Avant Quattro - 2.8ltr 30v V6/Automatic - 149k miles
1993 Volvo 240 Wagon - 2.3ltr SOHC/Automatic - 323k miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2008, 05:07 PM   #35 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_john View Post
Mine doesn't have a governor, the industrial model for fork lifts had a governor.
What? That's unpossible! If it didn't have a governor you would floor it and it'd run away until it died.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 04:09 PM   #36 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Ah yeah, the intermediate spring. If you take that off an engine should stay at whatever high idle the governor is set to.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 08:18 PM   #37 (permalink)
MechE
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 1,151

The Miata - '01 Mazda MX-5 Miata
Thanks: 0
Thanked 22 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
The point was there is lots of latitude for what will work to make a functional exhaust system. Trying to dissuade/scare someone off by talking about nodes and s*** is, well, B.S.
Sorry for the late reply..... But I agree - there's plenty of room to make a working exhaust system.... Auto mfr's just optimize as efficiently as possible as it's a big difference for them. Telling the muffler shop to move a hanger over a couple inches isn't going to change the cost of a custom job. The muffler shop also won't be optimized like the mfr who optimizes for more than power and torque (two things a corner shop guy is likely more concerned with)

And that said... I didn't see any dissuade anything over nodes/anti-nodes. I mean, really, look back... The last sentence of john's post was something like "Will it matter.... no" And really, nodes aren't scary - it's a relatively simple concept to grasp and is fundamental to a great deal of design for intended for public use The scary part is anti-nodes - that's where things can fail horridly :/
__________________
Cars have not created a new problem. They merely made more urgent the necessity to solve existing ones.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2008, 11:35 PM   #38 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
roflwaffle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,490

Camryaro - '92 Toyota Camry LE V6
90 day: 31.12 mpg (US)

Red - '00 Honda Insight

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius

3 - '18 Tesla Model 3
90 day: 152.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 349
Thanked 122 Times in 80 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by diesel_john View Post
is there a way to make mine a constant speed control using the go pedal for the setpoint, so it would not just be limiting the spill rack but increasing fuel if the rpm dropped below the setpoint.

is it the governor spring in this picture
No, with just adjustments/tweaks. Maybe, if you have some technical/electrical know-how...

-No. The only things you can adjust are how much fuel is injected at WOP (wide open pedal) via the Full-load adjusting screw, at what engine speed fuel starts getting cut via shimming/changing the Governor spring, and how fast it drops back down to low idle via removing/replacing/changing the Intermediate spring. So, you can adjust how quick it revs, how much fuel is injected per firing, and when the fuel gets cut/peak power/engine speed, but I don't see how you can set it up so that it'll increase fueling when engine speed automatically drops as dictated by a setpoint via the engine speed control lever/pedal.

-Maybe. If you have something that can move the Full-load screw in and out while driving, and a speed sensor, I think it's possible to build a circuit that will move the Full-load screw in and out in order to keep everything at a set speed. Whether or not this is easier/cheaper than a cruise control setup that just moves the pedal cable according to some speed sensor, I'm not sure.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 03:56 PM   #39 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
presidential's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 14
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by fanamingo View Post
Some of us are pretty new to modding in general. Do you have some good tuning resources you could link to for us? My limited searching has turned up a lot of results that haven't been very helpful.
I'll leaf through my bookmarks and see what I can do. Most of what I know started before there was an internet...
__________________
~Craig
1992 Nissan 240sx (32+mpg)
1982 AMC Jeep Wagoneer (19 mpg highway)
1964 Pontiac Catalina 455 (0 mpg, doesn't move)
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-19-2008, 04:32 PM   #40 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,314
Thanks: 24,440
Thanked 7,386 Times in 4,783 Posts
Plan-B?

Quote:
Originally Posted by brucepick View Post
OK, I'll try to keep the background writing brief.

I asked my mechanic friend if he'd install a smaller muffler in a different location, to enable me to do a better job covering the underside for aero improvement. The OEM muffler sits behind/above the rear bumper and I'd like to relocate a smaller muffler over on the side instead.

He says that the only muffler one could find that would fit would be a "performance" fart can. And that the reduced backpressure would fool the fuel management system into messing up the mixture which would defeat my purpose.

My '89 Volvo uses a Bosch Air Mass Meter between the airbox and throttle body, and an oxy sensor located in the cat converter.

He's basing his judgment partially on his own experience in his '85 Volvo that's turbo'd and has significant performance mods on top of that. When he opened up the exhaust system he had to remap his fuel management system. Both of us have 2.3 liter engines, his is turbo and has a mechanical air flow meter vs. my amm. My exhaust is 2" piping + cat + resonator + muffler. His is 3" piping plus cat + 3" exhaust pipe. No muffler.

What do you guys say? Should I go ahead and ask him to do it anyway? Or hunt for a restrictive fart can or add restriction to typical one?
If changing the muffler is going to open a bigger can of worms,I had a thought you might consider.Adding a undertray/bellypan only works if it is continuous to the front of the car,or the carmaker has already done such a good job at the vehicle's front,that it can provide attached flow to any additional underbody structure you might add.If you can get the belly of the Volvo clean,up to within striking range of the muffler,you probably won't miss the difference at the gas pump for not having the last and final section.The flow WILL separate a little early,but it will basically have all the useable kinetic energy of a fully paneled car.A fairing could also be attached to the muffler itself.I had to do this on the CRX.Subaru did alot of research with this sort of thing in the Eighties on their XT sports car,and found that bits and pieces of paneling perform close to that of a perfect pan as long as flow is clean in the forebody.You've got to respect heat buildup,however heat-blocking wraps,as used on racing headers,could get you around that one.It would be a real service to mankind,if all mufflers were rated for pressure differential at a uniform flow rate.There'd be no need for guessing about swaps.Perhaps SEMA will wake up one day,and get their members to provide potential customers with useful flowbench criteria for which to select aftermarket equipment.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 38 02-04-2010 11:35 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com