Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2008, 05:58 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Buda, Texas (Austin)
Posts: 13

Ryan - '94 Mazda 323 BASEEEEE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Fuel lines

I was wondering if fuel temperature would have any effect on MPGs...

Colder = Better

or

Warmer = Better

Anyone have any input on this?

I am toying around just for kicks with some different designs for the snake oil magnets and got to wondering about the fuel temperature thing.

I think I have some header wrap tape that I am considering insulating the fuel lines from the rail to the filter, wrapping the filter, then as far back as my roll of tape will take me. I was just wondering if anyone has knowledge that it would be a waste of time.

Things to remember... I live in Texas where hot is spring time and it progressively gets worse from there. Texas is the reason why I am hesitant to do some of the aero modding stuff to the car since it is an automatic... I am afraid it will burn the car up.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2008, 06:26 PM   #2 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason View Post
Texas is the reason why I am hesitant to do some of the aero modding stuff to the car since it is an automatic... I am afraid it will burn the car up.
Aeromodder extraordinaire Phil Knox lives in Texas:
The Phil Knox fleet - 34 years of aeromodding
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2008, 06:35 PM   #3 (permalink)
Recycling Nazi
 
Bror Jace's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: People's Republic of Albany
Posts: 234

Blue Bullet - '06 Honda Civic Sedan LX
90 day: 35.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Thumbs down

Colder (denser) air and/or fuel usually makes for more power ... but with a corresponding increase in fuel consumption.

With carbureted cars, hot fuel lines would make for vapor lock. This probably won't occur with fuel injection, however. At some point it might ... if the fuel gets hot enough to overcome the higher inlet pressures.
__________________
--- Bror Jace
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 12:23 PM   #4 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
BBsGarage's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: My Own Private Idaho
Posts: 94

BBsRide - '06 Toyota Corolla CE
90 day: 31.64 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
You also do not want anything that will retain moisture. I would think that would greatly reduce the fuel lines life.
__________________
Thanks.

Bill
SippingFuel
Check out BBsGarage
Picture ur Pet


  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 02:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
tasdrouille's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672

The Guzzler - '08 Hyundai Elantra GL
90 day: 33.12 mpg (US)

Got Soul? - '11 Kia Soul 2U
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
In lab tests, warmer mixtures have been shown burn more efficiently than colder ones.

That being said, recent FI cars have their fuel heated at the fuel rail, so you'd be wasting your time insulating the lines. Even if your fuel doesn't get heated, I don't think it would make a significant difference anyway. Installing a fuel heater might, but not just insulating.
__________________



www.HyperKilometreur.com - Quand chaque goutte compte...
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 04:11 PM   #6 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6

Pearl Bus - '92 Toyota Previa
90 day: 28.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Heating Fuel to Vapor

Theoretically hotter fuel is better. It has more energy.

I also recently saw this video for a PICC (pre-ignition catalytic converter) system. It heats up the fuel with the catalytic converter before it enters the fuel injectors. They claim an increase of 500% in mileage on a bench-top V-8. They say they are still working on it, we'll see. Here's the video: http://upto100mpg.com/video.htm

I also use a vaporizer device on my car and have seen a 5 MPG improvement so I know there's something to the idea.

Cheers,
Lorenzo
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 04:20 PM   #7 (permalink)
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211

The White Car - '84 Mercedes-Benz 300td
90 day: 28.84 mpg (US)

The Blue Car - '86 BMW 535i
Last 3: 23.86 mpg (US)
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
While warmer fuel might atomize better, remember that the ECU will still adjust the AFR to compensate. It's probably a wash.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 08:27 PM   #8 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 167

Red Egg - '95 Ford Aspire
90 day: 38.51 mpg (US)

Dodge SRT-4 - '04 Dodge Neon SRT-4 2.4L Turbo
90 day: 26.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I would rather find a way to increase the pressure of the fuel, say 15%, and drop down one fuel injector size in a quest for better atomization. Fuel rails are typically sittin on top or against a hot engine, and are hot enouh to burn on touch once the engine has been running a while, so I dont think much can be had there. Some "kits" sneak out a tiny bit of fuel and let it turn to a vapor.then let it get sucked into the engine but again the ecu knows all about it and I doubt I would see a change there either.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2008, 08:50 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master Novice
 
elhigh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314

Josie - '87 Toyota Pickup
90 day: 29.5 mpg (US)

Felicia - '09 Toyota Prius Base
90 day: 52.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzo View Post
Theoretically hotter fuel is better. It has more energy.
They claim an increase of 500% in mileage on a bench-top V-8. They say they are still working on it, we'll see. Here's the video: http://upto100mpg.com/video.htm
Cheers,
Lorenzo
The first bit makes sense, since it uses heat the engine might otherwise waste and stashes it in the fuel. That's good.

That 500% mileage claim, however, is pure rubbish. Using existing technology and adding a heater to the fuel delivers five times more fuel mileage? Not gonna happen. You'd do better to spend your money on a Tornado.
__________________




Lead or follow. Either is fine.
  Reply With Quote
Old 02-09-2011, 08:11 PM   #10 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: washington state
Posts: 37

The green machine - '94 Geo Metro
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
So i installed a 10 plate heat exchanger on my 94 metro today. Heated the fuel right up going in the throttle body. car barley drives. after further testing it apears that the gas boiling piont is much to low and all the fuel is turned to vapor before it reaches the injector and then the on time etc is way out of wack. long story short doesnt work. but i did leave the heat exchanger and hooked my washer fluid to it and now i have jet hot washer fluid, bonus!

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to watercat For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (03-11-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Fuel Economy related papers tasdrouille General Efficiency Discussion 41 03-19-2021 07:31 PM
Aerodynamic Heavy-Duty Truck Trailer Cuts Fuel Consumption and Emissions By Up to 15% SVOboy Aerodynamics 11 12-27-2011 08:18 AM
Engine braking without using fuel idea Dane-ger EcoModding Central 38 02-04-2010 11:35 AM
Psychological Ways of Saving Fuel Wayneburg General Efficiency Discussion 22 06-06-2008 10:24 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 12:38 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com