06-08-2008, 05:58 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Buda, Texas (Austin)
Posts: 13
Ryan - '94 Mazda 323 BASEEEEE
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Fuel lines
I was wondering if fuel temperature would have any effect on MPGs...
Colder = Better
or
Warmer = Better
Anyone have any input on this?
I am toying around just for kicks with some different designs for the snake oil magnets and got to wondering about the fuel temperature thing.
I think I have some header wrap tape that I am considering insulating the fuel lines from the rail to the filter, wrapping the filter, then as far back as my roll of tape will take me. I was just wondering if anyone has knowledge that it would be a waste of time.
Things to remember... I live in Texas where hot is spring time and it progressively gets worse from there. Texas is the reason why I am hesitant to do some of the aero modding stuff to the car since it is an automatic... I am afraid it will burn the car up.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-08-2008, 06:26 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jason
Texas is the reason why I am hesitant to do some of the aero modding stuff to the car since it is an automatic... I am afraid it will burn the car up.
|
Aeromodder extraordinaire Phil Knox lives in Texas:
The Phil Knox fleet - 34 years of aeromodding
|
|
|
06-08-2008, 06:35 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Recycling Nazi
Join Date: May 2008
Location: People's Republic of Albany
Posts: 234
Thanks: 2
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
|
Colder (denser) air and/or fuel usually makes for more power ... but with a corresponding increase in fuel consumption.
With carbureted cars, hot fuel lines would make for vapor lock. This probably won't occur with fuel injection, however. At some point it might ... if the fuel gets hot enough to overcome the higher inlet pressures.
__________________
--- Bror Jace
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 12:23 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: My Own Private Idaho
Posts: 94
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
You also do not want anything that will retain moisture. I would think that would greatly reduce the fuel lines life.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 02:07 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Mirabel, QC
Posts: 1,672
Thanks: 35
Thanked 86 Times in 57 Posts
|
In lab tests, warmer mixtures have been shown burn more efficiently than colder ones.
That being said, recent FI cars have their fuel heated at the fuel rail, so you'd be wasting your time insulating the lines. Even if your fuel doesn't get heated, I don't think it would make a significant difference anyway. Installing a fuel heater might, but not just insulating.
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 04:11 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Heating Fuel to Vapor
Theoretically hotter fuel is better. It has more energy.
I also recently saw this video for a PICC (pre-ignition catalytic converter) system. It heats up the fuel with the catalytic converter before it enters the fuel injectors. They claim an increase of 500% in mileage on a bench-top V-8. They say they are still working on it, we'll see. Here's the video: http://upto100mpg.com/video.htm
I also use a vaporizer device on my car and have seen a 5 MPG improvement so I know there's something to the idea.
Cheers,
Lorenzo
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 04:20 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
Harebrained Idea Skeptic
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Alpharetta, GA
Posts: 211
Thanks: 19
Thanked 13 Times in 9 Posts
|
While warmer fuel might atomize better, remember that the ECU will still adjust the AFR to compensate. It's probably a wash.
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:27 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fontana, CA
Posts: 167
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I would rather find a way to increase the pressure of the fuel, say 15%, and drop down one fuel injector size in a quest for better atomization. Fuel rails are typically sittin on top or against a hot engine, and are hot enouh to burn on touch once the engine has been running a while, so I dont think much can be had there. Some "kits" sneak out a tiny bit of fuel and let it turn to a vapor.then let it get sucked into the engine but again the ecu knows all about it and I doubt I would see a change there either.
__________________
|
|
|
06-09-2008, 08:50 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Lorenzo
Theoretically hotter fuel is better. It has more energy.
They claim an increase of 500% in mileage on a bench-top V-8. They say they are still working on it, we'll see. Here's the video: http://upto100mpg.com/video.htm
Cheers,
Lorenzo
|
The first bit makes sense, since it uses heat the engine might otherwise waste and stashes it in the fuel. That's good.
That 500% mileage claim, however, is pure rubbish. Using existing technology and adding a heater to the fuel delivers five times more fuel mileage? Not gonna happen. You'd do better to spend your money on a Tornado.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
02-09-2011, 08:11 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: washington state
Posts: 37
Thanks: 0
Thanked 3 Times in 2 Posts
|
So i installed a 10 plate heat exchanger on my 94 metro today. Heated the fuel right up going in the throttle body. car barley drives. after further testing it apears that the gas boiling piont is much to low and all the fuel is turned to vapor before it reaches the injector and then the on time etc is way out of wack. long story short doesnt work. but i did leave the heat exchanger and hooked my washer fluid to it and now i have jet hot washer fluid, bonus!
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to watercat For This Useful Post:
|
|
|