Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-26-2017, 03:04 PM   #21 (permalink)
EcoModding flying lizard
 
Daschicken's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Georgia
Posts: 743

Cibbie - '88 Honda CBR 250R
Motorcycle
90 day: 48.49 mpg (US)

Rarity - '06 Honda Accord EX V6
Team Honda
90 day: 29.88 mpg (US)

Baby viff - '86 Honda VFR 400R
Motorcycle
90 day: 42.15 mpg (US)

Latios - '08 Suzuki SV650SF
Motorcycle
90 day: 64.56 mpg (US)

Mazda 3 - '14 Mazda 3 i Sport
90 day: 43.25 mpg (US)
Thanks: 618
Thanked 263 Times in 175 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by westygo View Post
I figured silicone was a good removable solution. What do you suggest?
Velcro would be more removeable, that's what I have holding my grille block on, that and a single screw.(which has saved the block from falling off... )

__________________
-Kaze o tatakaimasen-

Best trip in V6: 52.0
Best tank in V6: 46.0
Best tank in Mazda: 49.9
Best tank in CBR: 61.3
Best tank in SV: 83.9

Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You can lead a fashion-conscious horse to unusual-looking water...

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-26-2017, 03:05 PM   #22 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
Velcro is an idea, but I often find it's a battle between various adhesive strengths vs. the velcro itself.

I like stainless screws personally. You can put some backing material behind the grille and drill through that rather than through the grille itself (if preserving it is a priority).
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-26-2017, 03:58 PM   #23 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Tab and slot so the fastener only restrains movement and not separation.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-27-2017, 03:14 AM   #24 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
Thanks for the input. I will reconsider!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 10:37 PM   #25 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
Some more aero work today. Installed fog light pocket covers. Also did some more work on the front belly pan/splitter.

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1330.jpg
Views:	165
Size:	52.9 KB
ID:	22835

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1334.jpg
Views:	125
Size:	84.0 KB
ID:	22836

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1335.jpg
Views:	107
Size:	46.0 KB
ID:	22837

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1336.jpg
Views:	184
Size:	36.8 KB
ID:	22838
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to westygo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (10-14-2017), Gasoline Fumes (10-09-2017)
Old 10-09-2017, 10:44 PM   #26 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
The belly pan is mostly so I have somewhere to install deflectors for the front wheels. While pondering how to attach it I realized I could just extend the pan past the dam and make a splitter. This should lower the stagnation point, reduce lift and send more air over the top of the car....I think.


Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1325.jpg
Views:	116
Size:	80.3 KB
ID:	22839

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1326.jpg
Views:	112
Size:	98.7 KB
ID:	22840

Click image for larger version

Name:	IMG_1327.jpg
Views:	136
Size:	75.9 KB
ID:	22841
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to westygo For This Useful Post:
Gasoline Fumes (10-09-2017)
Old 10-09-2017, 10:59 PM   #27 (permalink)
Too many cars
 
Gasoline Fumes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: New York State
Posts: 1,605

CRXFi - '88 Honda CRX XFi

Insight 256 - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Insight 5342 (no IMA) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 66.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,355
Thanked 801 Times in 477 Posts
Looks great!
__________________
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2000 Honda Insight
2006 Honda Insight (parts car)
1988 Honda CRXFi
1994 Geo Metro

  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2017, 11:30 PM   #28 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
A narrow splitter will stiffen the edge. Decide if you want that. Flexible or brittle?

Wider ones will produce downforce. Decide if you want that. Handling or economy?

Some airdams have a notch in the center to cause a jet of air down the center while shrouding the wheels. Gasoline Fumes has an extreme example.

edit: what I'm talking about:

http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post551905

Hey, it's in your thread.

Last edited by freebeard; 10-09-2017 at 11:36 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2017, 04:50 PM   #29 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 56
Thanks: 1
Thanked 42 Times in 19 Posts
I am thinking that because the clearance is so high (7") I won't need to let more air through. This is 100% for FE, my thoughts on thebsplitter are that lowering the stagnation point will cause more air to flow over the car, and therefore less drag. Is this reasonable?
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-11-2017, 05:33 AM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,880 Times in 7,328 Posts
Not unreasonable?

The volume of air may matter less than the proportion that flows freely vs being blocked by the wheels. The idea of the central jet seems to be that it delivers energized air to the diffuser at the rear.

Air that is parted to the sides self-cancels (on average). Air that goes over the top contributes to lift.

Here's an example from history — a feature that didn't make it from Buckminster Fuller's Omni-directional Trasport, to its ground-taxiing test form, the Dymaxion
car:



He called it an 'air keel'. It was a central jet on a tricycle that fed air to the empennage.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com