01-21-2017, 10:23 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Hello from PA
Hey Everyone! I thought id say hello. My name is Mitch, I come from Southeast Pennsylvania and I drive a 1995 Ford Bronco 302. Not the most fuel efficient or aerodynamic car, but I have a thing for old school trucks, and it was my first vehicle so it holds some sentimental value. I'm building a new motor to maximize fuel efficiency (20mpg goal) and when I discovered this forum I figured id make an account. Plus I like learning new things and it never hurts to network.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
01-22-2017, 10:34 AM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Focused on MPG
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Uphill from the river!
Posts: 439
Thanks: 135
Thanked 136 Times in 107 Posts
|
Welcome and I hope you can have fun with your build.
If you have any downhill driving, throw it in neutral with engine running if you feel it is safe to do so, also check out the 65+ or the 100+ tips, lots of info
Check out Arrowhead or slowmover, both are trucks with significantly better mileage
Lots of inspiration here
Also, make 4 more small posts and you can post pics so we can encourage and suggest ideas
__________________
Staying Focus'd on MPG
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to ECO-AKJ For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2017, 10:44 AM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,588 Times in 1,555 Posts
|
Welcome to the site. You don't have the best vehicle for top mpgs, but you certainly can increase it from what you have. If you're rebuilding you have a lot of options. Good luck and post a build thread on the Bronco so you can get some ideas from others.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
|
|
01-22-2017, 06:55 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
|
Welcome! Is a 1995 Bronco OBD1 or OBD2? If the latter, you can get a scangauge or ultragauge for it. Maybe you new engine could be newer? That would guarantee OBD2 I bet.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
01-23-2017, 09:33 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SE PA
Posts: 33
Thanks: 0
Thanked 8 Times in 8 Posts
|
Howdy neighbor, I'm in Media PA.
Will the new motor be a rebuild of the original or a newer more efficient injected one? Does the Bronco have an auto or stick and is it an overdrive unit? If not swapping to an OD trans will help to move you to your target.
One of my rides is an '05 Ford Excursion V-10 4X4, it's modded some to improve it's towing abilities as it serves as our dedicated tow rig for an 11,000lb travel trailer. But in it's original factory stock configuration I have gotten 15.5MPG on a mixed highway / coastal Maine town trip with 6 adults onboard, not bad for a giant 8,000lb wagon, your goal should be attainable.
|
|
|
01-23-2017, 02:10 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
It's all about Diesel
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,913
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,694 Times in 1,512 Posts
|
Most of the full-size Broncos from '80 to '96 that I've seen were fitted with the 300cu.in. inline-6 and a manual transmission, and most likely to be assembled in Venezuela. Without extensive mods to enhance its off-road capabilities and driven conservatively, 20MPG wouldn't seem unachievable.
Anyway, do you know the differential ratio currently fitted to your ride? And would you eventually be comfortable to try a higher ratio even if that could lead to a compromise of its towing capability?
|
|
|
01-24-2017, 12:19 AM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Okay so to answer the questions:
"Will the new motor be a rebuild of the original or a newer more efficient injected one? Does the Bronco have an auto or stick and is it an overdrive unit? If not swapping to an OD trans will help to move you to your target."
It is currently a sequential port fuel injected. my transmission is the E4OD, 4 speed overdrive electronic lockup T/C.
It has 3.55:1 gears, and despite my friends attempts to get me to "go to 4.10s bruh!" im not going to because fuel efficiency. Im going to swap in some 4 hole injectors for better fuel atomization. It is lifted, but the tire size is stock, more or less (switched to metric tires, there's always a minute difference)
|
|
|
01-24-2017, 12:28 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
QUESTION:
Im looking into getting some better flowing heads (GT40) from a cobra mustang.
these are usually used for power gains.
matched with a fuel efficient cam and roller lifters/rockers, mild injectors, could I harness the better flowing capabilities without the atrocious fuel economy usually attributed to 5.0 mustangs and the usual "racecar" mods. everyone knows an engine is essentially an air pump, and the easier it can flow the better. I already have some headers and a mandrel bent exhaust.
|
|
|
01-24-2017, 12:39 AM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jan 2017
Location: Pottstown, PA
Posts: 9
Thanks: 3
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
ANOTHER QUESTION: I should preface this by saying i am 21 years old.
Everyone I know says cold air intakes are the way to go. "cold air intake bro!" "power and efficiency bro" you know.
But ive been studying automotive technology and in my spare time i watch YouTube and have seen several videos proving that stock intakes that draw air from inside the engine bay work better. I mean, think about it, its gotta be engineered by someone with a doctorate. besides, we all know that fuel atomizes better in warmer air, and im pretty sure the S-10 where i go to school has a pipe from the air cleaner that goes down to a shroud to the exhaust manifold. therefore, is a heated air intake a thing? is it better? oh man i need some ideas.
|
|
|
|