Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-18-2010, 04:55 PM   #61 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
It also had "hard" shoulders (which I've since learned are to be avoided).
Why is that? My current kammback has hard edges, so what should I look for in the second design?

__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-18-2010, 05:10 PM   #62 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
hard edges or shoulders?

Sharp cutoffs at the rear are generally a good thing (short of a complete taper). A rounded body shape is better for good aerodynamics, think of the cylindrical fuselage of a passenger plane. Darin is referring to the bends or creases in the cardboard where it turns down on the sides of his hatchback. It would be somewhat better aerodynamically if those were more rounded. If the air pressure on the sides is not exactly the same at that coming over the top, rounded shoulders can allow those to equalize a little. Sharp shoulders can be vortex generators which increase turbulence and drag.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to COcyclist For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (08-20-2010), Piwoslaw (08-22-2010)
Old 08-18-2010, 08:21 PM   #63 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
I see, thanks for the clarification.
__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-24-2010, 07:48 PM   #64 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
ABA Testing update:

Kammback data:


Graph:


This seems to me to match pretty well with the coast down data from before.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Weather Spotter For This Useful Post:
theoteacher (09-25-2010)
Old 08-24-2010, 08:05 PM   #65 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
More picts of car now that it is painted:



__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Weather Spotter For This Useful Post:
Piwoslaw (08-29-2010), theoteacher (09-25-2010)
Old 08-28-2010, 02:09 PM   #66 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
Oem

It's 'seamless',looks like OEM from parts department! I don't know how onlookers wouldn't think it was just a 'factory' car.Realy nice!
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2010, 02:52 PM   #67 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
Thanks for the complent!

up close you can tell that it is home made, but not without looking hard
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2010, 07:47 PM   #68 (permalink)
Do more with less
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: North Eastern Missouri
Posts: 930

OD - '05 Ford Econoline
90 day: 18.64 mpg (US)

Joetta - '86 Volkswagen Jetta Turbo Oil Burner
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 49.71 mpg (US)

Benzilla - '85 Mercedes Benz 300D
90 day: 28.08 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 177 Times in 112 Posts
I agree weatherspotter. You did a nice job of integrating your modifications. Sometime take a nice 3/4 view.

I hope I can do something like that for my camo minivan.

__________________
“The further a society drifts from the truth, the more it will hate those that speak it.” George Orwell

“Before a standing army can rule, the people must be disarmed; as they are in almost every kingdom in Europe.

The supreme power in America cannot enforce unjust laws by the sword; because the whole body of the people are armed.”

Noah Webster, 1787
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Jeep Cherokee "Aeromatics" (Kammback / partial boat tail) JeepNmpg2 Aerodynamics 74 03-10-2012 12:49 PM
Designing a partial kammback on a sedan AeroModder Aerodynamics 37 01-31-2012 09:54 PM
2009+ Honda Fit - ideal rear design for Kammback MetroMPG Aerodynamics 16 01-28-2012 03:50 PM
Kammback design trikkonceptz Aerodynamics 1 05-07-2008 07:07 PM
Partial Kammback prototype tested - preliminary results MetroMPG Aerodynamics 8 11-28-2007 09:51 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com