Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-17-2014, 08:52 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: kingston ontario
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
horrable fuel milage above 90 km/h (2002 sierra 5.3 automatic)

hello, i bought a truck because i run a construction company and i need one i use the box everyday. after i bought it , i figured out it had stock, upgraded 4:10 gears, and it has 265/70/16 tires ( stock tires and gears but there lower )... so im pritty sure the lask of mileage comes from the fact that i rev at 2200 - 2400 at hwy speed and im on the hwy all the time. i know for all of your yuppie cars putting bigger tires ( not mud tires just upgraded hight) on causes it to burn more fuel, but what about on a truck, where i would be lowering the cruseing rpms ?

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-17-2014, 08:56 PM   #2 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: kingston ontario
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
2002 sierra 5.3 automatic any other questions about her?
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-17-2014, 10:20 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
mcrews's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,523

The Q Sold - '02 Infiniti Q45 Sport
90 day: 23.08 mpg (US)

blackie - '14 nissan altima sv
Thanks: 2,203
Thanked 663 Times in 478 Posts
Welcome!
There are many threads about slightly larger tires, have you tried a search?
Larger diameter tires can decrease rpm and thus increase mpg at highway speeds
What mph is 2400 rpm?
Maybe you just need to slow down ?
My 2002 Infiniti Q45 saw at 1750 rpm at 60 mph ( I had larger diameter tires) that 5.3 v8 is probably reving a little high.
__________________
MetroMPG: "Get the MPG gauge - it turns driving into a fuel & money saving game."

ECO MODS PERFORMED:
First: ScangaugeII
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...eii-23306.html

Second: Grille Block
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...e-10912-2.html

Third: Full underbelly pan
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...q45-11402.html

Fourth: rear skirts and 30.4mpg on trip!
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...tml#post247938
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2014, 09:40 AM   #4 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,526

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 65.39 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,971 Times in 3,608 Posts
Need more info: what mileage are you seeing at what cruising speed?

What is the truck's highway rating (EPA, not NRCAN)?
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-18-2014, 02:07 PM   #5 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Are you running LT tires or just standard radial tires? LT tires are heavier but have higher load ratings which you may or may not need.

Taller tires are also heavier, so you'll have to watch for that. If you switch from steel wheels to light aluminum wheels at the same time as increasing tire diameter, it may be enough to cancel out. But, higher tire pressures will likely help more than increasing tire size.

I had a similar truck. Check out the link in my signature for more details.
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 08:08 AM   #6 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: kingston ontario
Posts: 5
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
even if i dont use the load rateing all the time, i would still like it , in the tires, and i dont drive to fast, thats the speed limit, or very mildly above it i see 17 mpg ish at 80 and it drops the faster i go, by alot. vs my dads f150 revs at the same rpms at 130 km's. i would like to get rims and tire upgrade, but not in the budget right now
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 10:04 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aardvarcus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Evensville, TN
Posts: 676

Deep Blue - '94 GMC Suburban K2500 SLE
90 day: 23.75 mpg (US)

Griffin (T4R) - '99 Toyota 4Runner SR5
90 day: 25.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 237
Thanked 580 Times in 322 Posts
I also have a similar GM truck with 4:10 gears.
Is your tow/haul button pushed in? I don't think your transmission is shifting into overdrive, or the gearing is a lot lower than 4.10. Start from a dead stop and count the number of shifts it makes.
You stated 2200 - 2400 at highway speed, I am assuming that is your mentioned 90kph, or about 56 mph. If the speedometer in a GM truck with factory diameter tires reads 56, your are probably actually doing about 51 mph. (Your 265/70R16 is roughly the same diameter as factory 245/75R16.)
51 mph is 4488 feet/minute, and with 31” tires you will go about 8.111 feet per revolution, thus your tires spin 553 times in a minute. With 4:10s in the back, that means your driveshaft is spinning 2268 times a minute. With your transmission in direct drive (3rd), that would mean your engine is also spinning about 2268, so right in the middle of your 2200-2400 range. Your truck should not be in direct drive, it should shift into overdrive (4th) and have a 0.70:1 ratio, dripping your rpms to 1588, which would be about right.
Either that, or someone put rock crawler type gears in it, around a 5:86 ratio to get those rpms at that speed.
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to aardvarcus For This Useful Post:
darcane (08-19-2014), MetroMPG (08-19-2014)
Old 08-19-2014, 10:47 AM   #8 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,253

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 273
Thanked 3,563 Times in 2,828 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aardvarcus View Post
I also have a similar GM truck with 4:10 gears.
Is your tow/haul button pushed in? I don't think your transmission is shifting into overdrive, or the gearing is a lot lower than 4.10. Start from a dead stop and count the number of shifts it makes.
You stated 2200 - 2400 at highway speed, I am assuming that is your mentioned 90kph, or about 56 mph. If the speedometer in a GM truck with factory diameter tires reads 56, your are probably actually doing about 51 mph. (Your 265/70R16 is roughly the same diameter as factory 245/75R16.)
51 mph is 4488 feet/minute, and with 31” tires you will go about 8.111 feet per revolution, thus your tires spin 553 times in a minute. With 4:10s in the back, that means your driveshaft is spinning 2268 times a minute. With your transmission in direct drive (3rd), that would mean your engine is also spinning about 2268, so right in the middle of your 2200-2400 range. Your truck should not be in direct drive, it should shift into overdrive (4th) and have a 0.70:1 ratio, dripping your rpms to 1588, which would be about right.
Either that, or someone put rock crawler type gears in it, around a 5:86 ratio to get those rpms at that speed.
Sounds a lot like you have one of 2 problems.
Some one swaped out the gears or the transmission isn't going into over drive for some reason.
I would supect that the person who owned the truck before you realized the truck was having some kind of transmission issue and off loaded their problem onto you.

Another possibility is the torque converter lock up isn't working. But I think your RPMs would be closer to around 2000 or less.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 01:41 PM   #9 (permalink)
.........................
 
darcane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Buckley, WA
Posts: 1,597
Thanks: 391
Thanked 488 Times in 316 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by brucekramer613 View Post
even if i dont use the load rateing all the time, i would still like it , in the tires, and i dont drive to fast, thats the speed limit, or very mildly above it i see 17 mpg ish at 80 and it drops the faster i go, by alot. vs my dads f150 revs at the same rpms at 130 km's. i would like to get rims and tire upgrade, but not in the budget right now
Is yours 2wd or 4wd? I bought a used set of aluminum wheels off a 4wd Silverado. They have taller tires stock than the 2wd. The used set with good tires were half the price of just buying new rubber...

Definitely sort out your tranny issue, that should be your first step.

After than, look to aero mods. What is on your bed (if anything)?
__________________
Past Cars:

2001 Civic HX Mods

CTS-V

2003 Silverado Mods
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-19-2014, 04:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Got MPG?
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Southern Alberta, Canada
Posts: 330

The Car - '09 Toyota Corolla CE Enhanced
Thanks: 13
Thanked 43 Times in 38 Posts
Pretty sure factory tire size is 245/75R16. My truck revs at 1800 rpm at 90kph or 55mph, but I have 3.73 gears.

I plan to change mine to 235/85R16...It will correct my speedo error to match GPS, lower my highway cruising revs ~150 RPM and they are 10mm narrower than stock so less aero drag.

__________________
2013 Honda Civic Si - 2.4L
OEM front to back belly pan from the factory.

Last edited by LeanBurn; 08-19-2014 at 04:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com