04-08-2013, 09:34 AM
|
#141 (permalink)
|
High Mileage Lover
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Albuquerque, NM
Posts: 82
Thanks: 29
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Hi Darrell. I can only barely stand going 65 when the limit on many highways here is 75. I can't handle driving even more like an old lady. :-)
Atheria
__________________
I love my cute Fiat 500, Sophia!
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 12:04 PM
|
#142 (permalink)
|
...beats walking...
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
|
Which is more important? Milage or image?
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 12:09 PM
|
#143 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
My truck doesn't display instantaneous FE, just trip. Maybe it's just that that is what I'm used to, but anytime when I've driven a vehicle with an instantaneous readout, I haven't found it very useful. It just fluctuates too much. Plus, keep in mind that it's the TRIP fuel economy that's imprtant to you anyway--not the instantaneous.
Quote:
55-60 is nearly every car's sweet spot.
|
I can tell you my truck's "sweet spot" is WAY below 55-60 mph. My perspective is probably different than most because I drive a vehicle with a massively oversized engine with gobs of low-end torque, but, IMO the "sweet spot" for vehicles with manual transmissions is about as slow as you can tolerate driving.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
Last edited by Diesel_Dave; 04-08-2013 at 12:26 PM..
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 12:12 PM
|
#144 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R
55-60 is nearly every car's sweet spot.
|
Graph after graph after graph disputes that... unless you're talking about km/h
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...you-15182.html
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 12:36 PM
|
#145 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
In the absence of a BSFC chart, I like the ol' 1000-1200 ft/mn piston speed guide; on the Coupe that range is 50-60 mph, so I often hold 50.
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 12:45 PM
|
#146 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: ohio
Posts: 306
Tetanus - '95 Geo Tracker 4WD Base 90 day: 29.43 mpg (US) 300 - '82 Suzuki GS300 L Last 3: 60.78 mpg (US) Jeep - '98 Jeep XJ Cherokee Limited 90 day: 12.82 mpg (US)
Thanks: 28
Thanked 50 Times in 37 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
|
+1 My vehicle likes 35-40mph. I don't have to P&G to get great FE at those speeds.
My Jeep's sweet spot is about 50mph that is when the stupid torque converter finally locks up.
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 01:15 PM
|
#147 (permalink)
|
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: nowhere
Posts: 533
Thanks: 31
Thanked 86 Times in 69 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by alvaro84
What do you mean by sweet spot? Because the highest steady speed FE is almost always at the very bottom of the top gear. In case of my Yaris (which is a rather small car with a rather small engine and short gears, of course), it's like 30 mph, or even lower. You can't always go at 30, of course...
|
What you said is true in principle. Except that on most cars with an automatic tranny it will be when the car goes into TC lockup mode, which can be as high as 45 MPH. Obviously on a manual it will be the lowest speed you can sustain while in the highest gear. And it won't be 30 - but it need not be 55, either. However, you can go somewhat faster without sacrificing FE to speed, which is why the 55-60 MPH suggested is a workable compromise.
But real life often requires practicality, as opposed to the extraordinary lengths some ecomodders will go to save fuel. What's more important? Saving time and getting to your destination somewhat faster and not annoying the drivers behind you? Or making high fuel economy an obsession?
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 01:22 PM
|
#148 (permalink)
|
(:
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,556 Times in 2,218 Posts
|
#$^& the drivers behind, whenever they can pass.
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 01:29 PM
|
#149 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Fehérvárcsurgó, Hungary
Posts: 384
Thanks: 4
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
|
This is why I said you can't always go that slow. But my commute is a rather short trip (~15mi one way) and my best route mostly consists of deserted back roads So I can really expend a few minutes a day on a hobby, which happens to be hypermiling
But I wouldn't go that slow on busy main roads or longer trips. I'm also faster with Teresa, because her 5th gear is practically unusable below ~45mph and she rewards P&G over 45 with a few more mpg. Even 75-mph pulses aren't heresy with her.
It depends on many things.
|
|
|
04-08-2013, 01:35 PM
|
#150 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Indiana
Posts: 1,194
Thanks: 112
Thanked 511 Times in 213 Posts
|
Don't get me wrong, I'm not advocating going 20 mph on the freeway. But if we're talking strictly what's best for FE (with a manual tranny) slower is almost always better.
__________________
Diesel Dave
My version of energy storage is called "momentum".
My version of regenerative braking is called "bump starting".
1 Year Avg (Every Mile Traveled) = 47.8 mpg
BEST TANK: 2,009.6 mi on 35 gal (57.42 mpg): http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...5-a-26259.html
|
|
|
|