Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-17-2008, 08:13 PM   #11 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
coastdown procedure

Quote:
Originally Posted by 88CRX View Post
Thanks for the info.

do you have the equations and constants you used?

What was done to your car?
Coastdown procedure is formalized in SAE Handbook.The handbooks are published every year.Protocols can change or be augmented each year.My copy is from 1987.Volume 3 contains SAE Recommended Practice,SAE J1263 MAY84,"Road Load Measurement And Dynamometer Simulation Using Coastdown Techniques".------------------------ The coastdown portion is covered in 2-1/2 pages of small print.This is what CAR and DRIVER used for the coastdowns on my CRX.----------------------------- Let me know if you can gain access to the title.If not,we'll go to plan-B.--------------------------------- The on-line calculator may be an easier route.Don't know.

__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-17-2008, 11:14 PM   #12 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Texas
Posts: 6

The Toy - '00 Ford Escort ZX2 S/R
90 day: 33.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
.........I need an abandoned runway as SAE used at Edward's.-------------
Have you checked with the North Texas Regional Airport, in Denison? It is the former Perrin AFB. They have a parallel runway just west of the main runway. Evolution Performance Driving School and BMW Car Club have used that west runway for schools and autocrosses. But, it's only 8000 feet long.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to SeeSRgo For This Useful Post:
ECONORAM (12-27-2010)
Old 09-18-2008, 08:30 PM   #13 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
8000

Quote:
Originally Posted by SeeSRgo View Post
Have you checked with the North Texas Regional Airport, in Denison? It is the former Perrin AFB. They have a parallel runway just west of the main runway. Evolution Performance Driving School and BMW Car Club have used that west runway for schools and autocrosses. But, it's only 8000 feet long.
Thanks SeeSRgo,8,000 feet might be useful.It's a bit out of the way,however when it seemed a likely time to do that kind of work,it could be the hot ticket!Public roadways no longer hold much promise.I'll look into it down the road,as I've many projects nearer the front burner.I appreciate the tip,Phil.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 04:49 PM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
...SAE J1263 MAY84,"Road Load Measurement And Dynamometer Simulation Using Coastdown Techniques".------------------------ The coastdown portion is covered in 2-1/2 pages of small print....
Hi Phil,

Can you post the several pages of that SAE paper somewhere?

Just want to make sure all the pertinent variables are covered when calculating Cd and Crr.

Thanks, Jim.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-24-2009, 06:33 PM   #15 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 62.14 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
I think Phil's away for a couple of weeks.

Until we hear back, have you seen this? Measure the drag coefficient of your car
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2009, 01:47 PM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
...Until we hear back, have you seen this? Measure the drag coefficient of your car
Hi Metro,

Yes, that is the link from the "instructables".

If you dig around that site, there is another link to what looks like a Wikipedia styled page.

There is a spreadsheet attached that shows some calculations on how to do coast downs.

The Crr shown is a fixed value regardless of temperature or velocity. I think both of these factors do affect the Crr. On the web there are several sites regarding bicycle coast downs that discuss the effect of temperature and velocity regarding it's affect on Crr.

As I get more data, factors that affect Crr will incorporated into a spreadsheet which is already started with the three coast down tests that have been done so far. It shows that velocity does indeed affect the Crr, and changes as the car slows down during the test on a flat road.

Jim.
  Reply With Quote
Old 12-31-2009, 04:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
Sae

Quote:
Originally Posted by 3-Wheeler View Post
Hi Phil,

Can you post the several pages of that SAE paper somewhere?

Just want to make sure all the pertinent variables are covered when calculating Cd and Crr.

Thanks, Jim.
Wow Jim,I'm like light years late on this.
I purposely did not post the SAE material due to their severe copyright restrictions they published,and out of respect that they,like musicians and artists need to have their material protected and profit from it.
If you will send me a PM we can work something out.Maybe you can transpose some of the pertinent info for the members wishing also to try coastdowns.
  Reply With Quote
Old 01-01-2010, 12:51 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
Hello,

Here are some coast-down numbers for those that like mathematics...

For me, this started right after MetroMPG posted some numbers of his boat tail improvement. The thought of doing coast downs and checking for any kind of an aero gain was too good to pass up.

So with this in mind, several roads on the way to work were chosen for their inherent flatness as discovered by Google Earth.

The data collection device is a Garmin hand held GPS, that is currently set to collect data every 2 seconds.

Before a run, the Garmin is turned on about one mile before the event to allow it to get tentative satellite information and settle down in it's readings.

Two types of testing were initially thought as being important:

1) High speed, as in starting at about 60 mph.
2) Low speed, as in below 15 mph or so.

The high speed is obvious; we use the high air resistance to determine air drag, or Cd.

The low speed option is meant to determine the overall rolling resistance of the vehicle, including losses in the drive train, as well as tire rolling resistance, or Crr.

------ Low Speed Rolling Resistance ------

Shown below is the raw output data from the GPS device. It spits out:
X-data (Latitude)
Y-data (Longitude)
Z-data (Elevation)
...data for each run.

The data is extracted via a custom Visual Basic program, which is used primarily for keeping track of bicycle ride data, but is also useful for coast down testing as well shall see.



This raw data is then converted to world Geodetic data that simulates the outer crust of the Earth, as shown in the data below:



The graph below shows both the raw GPS readings and a "smoothed" set of data.

Note that this GPS device is not an industrial quality unit, such as those used for building bridges and such. Because of this, the data yielded is pretty rough and needs to be messaged for our purposes. Fortunately there are ways to do this, such as low order curve fitting.

For the "smooth" curve on this graph, the GPS raw data was smoothed by a process known as polynomial curve fitting, either first order or second order equations. A first order equation is also known as linear regression or y=mx + b. The graph below has data smoothed by first and second order polynomials.

The graph is a low speed run in town on a flat street with little traffic in either direction. The velocity is shown in meters/second, but can be estimated in MPH by doubling the numbers.



The next picture is on the same street, but going the opposite way.



Now the numbers are converted to effective Crr. This picture shows us heading with the wind. Remember that this was in town, so the houses partially block the wind.



And here is the same run, but in the opposite direction. The true Crr based on these two graphs, is a sloped line somewhere between the two shown here.



From these two graphs, several things become obvious:

1) The basic Crr of the vehicle does not go to zero at zero speed.
2) As the vehicle velocity picks up, the effective Crr goes up as well.

So it can be seen that Crr is not a fixed value, as outside temperature and vehicle velocity do affect our vehicle Crr. Notice in the graphs, Crr is defined as Crr (v * t), since vehicle velocity and outside temperature also affect this number. As more data is collected, their effect on Crr will become more apparent.

This changing Crr as the vehicle speed increases is already well documented by of all things, a bicycle rider named John Tetz. Below is graph of very thoroughly documented coast downs from his bicycle collection.

John has discovered that Crr is variable, and not constant as alluded to in the article posted on the "instructables".

Measure the drag coefficient of your car

John Tetz Bicycle Coast Down Crr's


------ High Speed Air Drag ------

Several high speed runs have been analyzed as well. Since the vehicle Crr is not fully defined at this time due to a lack of supporting data, the high speed coast down data is only showing velocity and resultant deceleration, and no attempt is made to compute Cd.

This graph shows the coast down numbers for two runs on the same morning on the way to work. Watching the weather, this day was chosen for it's outside temperature and lack of winds.

It had snowed earlier in the week, but the road conditions were dry since the salt had done it's job. One road had the car facing east and the second about 20 minutes later, facing south.

These two runs show a difference of about 7%. The Google Earth and elevation data from the GPS show these roads to be extremely flat, although the second road is flat within 3 feet over the 1/2 mile stretch used for the testing.

It is obvious that wind is a factor in these two graphs. Even though posted weather data for the area showed calm wind conditions, this was definitely not the case here. One or both of the roads had to have some wind present for this large of a data variation. Ideally it would be nice to measure air speed during the tests, but this would involve another data collection device besides the GPS.

Of course measuring wind speed would not account for side winds and the resultant change in effective Cd of the vehicle. It may be more effective to keep collecting data until numerous runs with similar data can be compiled, and data not fitting within a certain percentage, discarded. Actually this last approach has been alluded to by AeroHead in a different conversation, so it certainly has some merit.



__________________________________________________ ______________

At this point, I'm not sure if back to back testing on the same road and the same day would yield acceptable results for testing our aero mods.

For testing my under body smoothing panels in an A-B-A fashion, it would take the better portion of a day:

1) Do the first run with the GPS
2) Drive back home, jack the car up 8 inches and remove all the panels
3) Go back to the same location and hope the temperature, traffic, and so on is the same as before
4) Perform the coast down tests
5) Drive back home again, jack up the car and put the panels back on
6) Drive back out again for another round of testing.

In the summer time, this type of test would present some variables that would make it hard to get repeatable results; i.e. temperature gain and air thinning plus the change in Crr because of this.

Of course, if one were a night owl, all of this could be done in the wee hours with hopefully better results.

__________________________________________________ _____________

With that being said, these coast down tests will continue, as the hope is to determine the major factors that go into performing testing that shows progress made to our vehicles.

It may be that we will find only one road that is flat enough for these tests to show reasonable repeatability.

John Tetz mentioned the use of a graded road instead of a flat road for his bicycle coast downs. It may turn out this is an option as well.

Jim.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-01.jpg
Views:	889
Size:	26.6 KB
ID:	5264   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-02.jpg
Views:	904
Size:	109.6 KB
ID:	5265   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-03.jpg
Views:	870
Size:	26.7 KB
ID:	5266   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-04.jpg
Views:	888
Size:	110.9 KB
ID:	5267   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-05.jpg
Views:	873
Size:	17.9 KB
ID:	5268  

Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-06.jpg
Views:	888
Size:	16.7 KB
ID:	5269   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-07.jpg
Views:	874
Size:	16.4 KB
ID:	5270   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-08.jpg
Views:	903
Size:	25.3 KB
ID:	5271  

Last edited by 3-Wheeler; 01-01-2010 at 05:20 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to 3-Wheeler For This Useful Post:
Cd (01-03-2010), Jean-Seb (05-20-2011)
Old 01-03-2010, 06:10 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
3-Wheeler's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Southern WI
Posts: 829

AlienMobile - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
90 day: 80.05 mpg (US)
Thanks: 101
Thanked 563 Times in 191 Posts
With the data variation that was apparent from the hand held GPS, a test was devised...

Set the GPS to sample rates of:

1 sample per second
2 "
4 "
10 "

The object of this test is to determine if sampling faster than the arbitrarily setting of one sample every two seconds could be improved on.

The maximum sample rate of the GPS is 1 sample per second.

We were on a road trip on the Interstate and traveling roughly at the same speed for the trip, so the GPS was set to record distance traveled for the four settings listed above.

The data was downloaded and analyzed in a spreadsheet. The goal was find a setting or settings that minimized the sample variation for distance traveled. This is key, since the GPS calculates the apparent speed based on distance and time. So if the recorded distance varies, then the speed calculation will as well.

The first graph shows the change in distance in the Y-axis in this graph, since on this portion of the highway, we were moving primarily north. The blue line is the raw data, and the pink line is the smoothed data by making three passes of a 5 sample average. Note: a high order polynomial was not used for this averaging, since it has a tendency to oscillate and not follow the data accurately, especially close to points at 58380 or so.



Averaging the raw data allows the data to be "normalized" as shown in the second graph. Now one can see the true variation of the raw data. Three standard deviations for the data was then calculated by the spreadsheet (roughly 99% confidence level).



After performing these operations for all four sample rates, here is what the data spread for each setting looks like...



Notice that the sample rate of 4 seconds did not work as well as one would expect. It may be that several semi trailers that drove by may have partially blocked the satellite signals enough the cause higher variation.

The fastest rate on the GPS seems to tax the unit with the high overhead of reading satellite data, calculating location, and saving this data to the internal memory.

Setting the unit to sample every 10 seconds would reduce the variation, but also severely limit the sheer number of samples collected during a coast down test. And the data variation is not much better than the 2 second setting.

It does appear that the setting of 2 seconds for each sample is a good compromise between rate and data variability.

Jim.
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-10.jpg
Views:	891
Size:	37.6 KB
ID:	5282   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-11.jpg
Views:	864
Size:	36.3 KB
ID:	5283   Click image for larger version

Name:	coast-12.jpg
Views:	824
Size:	25.2 KB
ID:	5284  

Last edited by 3-Wheeler; 01-03-2010 at 06:16 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to 3-Wheeler For This Useful Post:
Cd (01-03-2010)
Old 01-18-2011, 10:58 PM   #20 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
...here's a low-cost web-downloadable software program (Speed-Wiz) that might help:

Drag Coefficient Calculation

  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to gone-ot For This Useful Post:
skyking (02-17-2012), Tango Charlie (01-19-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Test: F-150 pickup "cap on" vs. "cap off" @ 60 mph MetroMPG Aerodynamics 17 11-17-2011 02:44 PM
Proposed braking test: comparing tire pressure @ 50 psi vs 35 brucepick EcoModding Central 55 06-11-2011 09:29 PM
Done: A-B-A test on rear wheel skirts - Corolla, Camry Hybrid MetroMPG Aerodynamics 11 06-06-2009 04:49 PM
Converting Emissions test to C02 g/km? cfg83 General Efficiency Discussion 3 01-15-2008 03:07 PM
Coast down test location idea newtonsfirstlaw Aerodynamics 1 12-08-2007 12:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com