07-11-2012, 05:17 PM
|
#41 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
I've done a lot of driving in the NC mountains which gets a fair amount of snow in the winter. I've never had any problem with snow buildup in the front skirts since the hot radiator exhaust blowing out through the front wheel wells melts any snow that gets up there.
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to basjoos For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
07-11-2012, 08:50 PM
|
#42 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
Basjoos, what was the gain for you from the wheel skirts?
Metro MPG testing showed a small loss, so I am unsure what to do.
__________________
|
|
|
07-11-2012, 09:21 PM
|
#43 (permalink)
|
.
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Salt Lake valley Utah
Posts: 923
Thanks: 114
Thanked 397 Times in 224 Posts
|
Basjoos, would having the leading edge of the wheel skirt recessed into the wheel well work (or be better) while still having the trailing edge flush with the outside of the car? I think of it like the scales of a fish where the front opening of the wheel well kicks up a fraction of an inch over the skirt, which does the same for the edge of the car. Or is having both sides of the wheel skirt flush with the outside of the car important.
From what i gather across several topics here, doing the best to minimize air going into the wheel well is important. Like on the Probe V series of concepts they have very good deflectors in front of the wheel. I would say minimizing the opening of the wheel well from beneath, and maybe even minimzing the volume of the wheel well would help. One car has an air vent behind the wheel well to vent pressure build up.
For Metro MPG's problem i think cutting off the back couple inches of the skirt would vent pressure while still improving airflow significantly over stock. You can always go with a fixed front skirt that just minimizes surface area of the outer wheel well to the tire itself. If you watch a second gen prius on a rainy day they kick up very little mist cause the wheel well isn't that much larger than the tire. If you watch a car with a big gap they're spraying mist from wells everywhere.
Does lawn edging running the length of the car help with it? Like extending the side of the car nearly to the ground with lawn edging?
Last edited by sheepdog 44; 07-11-2012 at 09:28 PM..
|
|
|
07-12-2012, 04:06 PM
|
#44 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Upstate SC
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 16
Thanked 677 Times in 302 Posts
|
I wouldn't recess the leading edge of the wheel skirt since that would create a small pocket of turbulence behind the leading edge of the wheel well and a recessed skirt would be harder to deploy without rubbing the well (if top hinged) when opening for sharp turns. My front skirts aren't flush with the outside of the car, they bulge out about 2.5" to provide space for the conveyer rollers inside the skirts. The front wheel skirts have a small slit at their trailing edge that vents pressure build up and radiator exhaust air from the wheel well.
My car has a double side skirt (made of coroplast, not lawn edging) running between the front and rear wheels. The distance between the inner and outer side skirt is the width of the tire.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to basjoos For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-15-2012, 02:15 PM
|
#45 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
some data:
last tank 712 miles at 57.7 MPG so I think the nose cone helped 1-2 MPG is my thought so far. more at faster speeds then slow.
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Weather Spotter For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2012, 06:38 PM
|
#46 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
|
57.7
You'll want to start scanning the skies for OPEC fighter jets! 'kidding!
|
|
|
07-16-2012, 06:45 PM
|
#47 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
I want to try for 60 MPG this tank
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Weather Spotter For This Useful Post:
|
|
07-16-2012, 08:51 PM
|
#48 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Alabama
Posts: 625
Thanks: 40
Thanked 156 Times in 103 Posts
|
Slap some front wheel skirts on there and you'll get 60 mpg no problem
|
|
|
07-16-2012, 09:01 PM
|
#49 (permalink)
|
Deadly Efficient
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Goshen, Indiana
Posts: 1,234
Thanks: 134
Thanked 176 Times in 91 Posts
|
57
Them's some nice numbers there, mister.
__________________
-Terry
|
|
|
07-16-2012, 10:04 PM
|
#50 (permalink)
|
Wiki Mod
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
|
90m miles on new tank, 59.2 MPG so far
__________________
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Weather Spotter For This Useful Post:
|
|
|