11-28-2007, 09:58 PM
|
This thread is in the EcoModder Project Library |
#1 (permalink)
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,527
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,976 Times in 3,612 Posts
|
How to improve fuel economy with a tonneau cover
Via autobloggreen.com ...
How to improve fuel economy with a tonneau cover
Quote:
Snugtop, a company that makes tonneau covers and bedcaps for pickups, [...] conducted a very intensive test this month at Irwindale Raceway in Southern California. Using fullsize pickups from Dodge, Ford and Chevy, the trucks were driven 100 laps at 45 mph. Two had tonneau covers and the third had a bedcap. The gas tanks were topped off and the tonneaus and bedcap removed for another 100 laps at 45 mph. Bottom line: Snugtop reports a 1.3 mpg improvement and says even better mileage can be expected at higher speeds.
|
Full details of their methodology is available, which is nice. (Have to go to the manufacturer's site to read it.)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-03-2008, 06:55 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,225
Thanks: 24,372
Thanked 7,354 Times in 4,754 Posts
|
snug top
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG
|
Darin,hope they didn't go broke buying and burning all that fuel.It's a great thing for them to have done all the testing.And 1.3 mpg at 45-mph really does speak for even better mpg at higher speeds.I've done your famous self-administered head-slap for just getting around to looking at this post at such a late date. Its a significant contribution,should really help the pickup owners, glad I got to see it,thanks much for posting it.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
06-03-2008, 10:19 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Boxhead
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredonia, NY
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
In college, I had a 1995 GMC Sonoma (S10 clone), with a regular cab and short bed (4cyl, 5 speed, 2wd-- totally stripped-down model). I had a tonneau cover the whole time I owned it, and I definitely got several mpg less at highway speeds when I didn't have it on (not that often, but I definitely could tell). With the cover on, and normal driving, I got around 30mpg at 75mph. My all time high was 32mpg, without really trying, and before I ever heard of hypermiling.
But yeah, to keep on topic, keeping the tailgate up is better than down, and a tonneau cover is better still. It's not as good as fashioning a cap into a pseudo-kammback, but every little bit helps.
__________________
|
|
|
07-10-2009, 10:05 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Boxhead
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Fredonia, NY
Posts: 322
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by zacksewer
Most of the time, I noticed more and more people in pickup trucks driving around with the tailgate down. Without an easy way to measure it, does this stay just a theory?
|
Actually, this is one of the few things that was done right on Mythbusters (since there were no explosions involved). Tailgate up is, without doubt, better than tailgate down. With the tailgate up, a vortex forms over the bed that sort of acts like a kammback (though not as effective, being normal-pressure air currents). That current does not form with the gate down; driving like that makes your wake bigger and more turbulent.
Yes, it's counterintuitive.
__________________
|
|
|
07-11-2009, 09:55 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
The SAE also has a published paper that proves tailgate up is better.
|
|
|
07-12-2009, 01:13 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
|
Wow!
They found out what I found out eight years ago. In a 70/60/city circuit I got a 1.5 MPG improvement.
Anybody wanna buy a nice ARE tonneau?
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 12:21 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Minneapolis
Posts: 6
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Nice MetroMPG. I learned a lot of information with this thread. I hope that I can improve fuel economy with a tonneau cover.
|
|
|
06-30-2010, 10:55 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Steppes of Central Indiana
Posts: 1,319
Thanks: 0
Thanked 186 Times in 127 Posts
|
If a tonneau does not help your pickup,you're doing something wrong.
__________________
2000 Ford F-350 SC 4x2 6 Speed Manual
4" Slam
3.08:1 gears and Gear Vendor Overdrive
Rubber Conveyor Belt Air Dam
|
|
|
10-30-2011, 02:14 AM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 110
Thanks: 0
Thanked 5 Times in 5 Posts
|
what if you were to place a piece of sheet metal from the middle of the bed,to the top of the tailgate? The low side would be at the bed and the high part would be at the tailgate.
|
|
|
10-31-2011, 06:46 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Aero Wannabe
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by sc2dave
what if you were to place a piece of sheet metal from the middle of the bed,to the top of the tailgate? The low side would be at the bed and the high part would be at the tailgate.
|
If you are thinking about it sloping up like a big spoiler it probably won't help mpg. Although, I believe Chevrolet did some testing and found a half tonneau covering the back of the bed was better than a full tonneau for reducing drag. It would have been level with the top of the bed though.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
|
|
|
|
|