08-14-2008, 07:32 PM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Legend in my own mind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
It's an interesting question, and sorta campaigns for electriv vehicles;
The silent drive by killers ... LOL
WHat I still do not understand is this; Every other industry has seen developmental booms, from the microchip to the automobile, yet we still drag our feet with batteries. What are we not suppose to know about batteries that makes their advancement so slow, other than the cleanest method of propulsion out there?
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"
I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 07:36 PM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
Pokémoderator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 5,864
Thanks: 439
Thanked 532 Times in 358 Posts
|
Unheard -
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unheard
Quote:
I wouldn't worry about the water in terms of Global Warming because it's not a "greenhouse gas".
|
You got it So So wrong with that statement
...
|
Whoops, you're absolutely right :
Greenhouse gas - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Quote:
The most important greenhouse gases are:
* water vapor, which causes about 36–70% of the greenhouse effect on Earth. (Note clouds typically affect climate differently from other forms of atmospheric water.)
* carbon dioxide, which causes 9–26%
* methane, which causes 4–9%
* ozone, which causes 3–7%
Note that this is a combination of the strength of the greenhouse effect of the gas and its abundance. For example, methane is a much stronger greenhouse gas than CO2—about 25 times more heat absorptive, but is present in much smaller concentrations.
|
Question: If you got the hydrogen from water in the ocean, then could you call that "closed loop"?
Question: What is the current world-wide automobile/CO2 production versus a "100% replacement" with fuel cell cars?
CarloSW2
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 07:44 PM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
Legend in my own mind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cfg83
Question: If you got the hydrogen from water in the ocean, then could you call that "closed loop"?
CarloSW2
|
If you derive Hydrogen from water of any kind, even polluted water, then all is well. The balance is not upset. However my theory claims that if we CREATE water from combining hydrogen and Oxygen separately, then we begin to throw off the natural balance...
I'm sure Arnold didn't think of this when he tried backing hydrogen cell vehicles in California.
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"
I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 08:08 PM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 26
My GSR - '96 Acura Integra GSR 90 day: 35 mpg (US) My 500F - '04 Suzuki GS500F 90 day: 62.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by trikkonceptz
If you derive Hydrogen from water of any kind, even polluted water, then all is well. The balance is not upset. However my theory claims that if we CREATE water from combining hydrogen and Oxygen separately, then we begin to throw off the natural balance...
I'm sure Arnold didn't think of this when he tried backing hydrogen cell vehicles in California.
|
I think we are pretty safe because of the hydrogen side. Hydrogen is not really found naturally. It is an energy carrier and has to be generated by another process like electrolysis or steam methane reforming.
__________________
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 08:11 PM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Legend in my own mind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by silverknight
I think we are pretty safe because of the hydrogen side. Hydrogen is not really found naturally. It is an energy carrier and has to be generated by another process like electrolysis or steam methane reforming.
|
That's why I say we are not safe ... because it is not derived from water of any kind, but from methane or other sources, thus adding water to the system.
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"
I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 08:16 PM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 26
My GSR - '96 Acura Integra GSR 90 day: 35 mpg (US) My 500F - '04 Suzuki GS500F 90 day: 62.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Depends on the methane. Are you using methane from cows? They make it from water and feed. Are you using methane from natural gas? You are in the same boat as oil.
We just need to make electrolysis more efficient and make generating electricity more efficient. Nuclear is by far the cheapest and cleanest way to make the most electricity. Maybe Mexico or Canada will let us build one or two on their land.
__________________
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 08:24 PM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Legend in my own mind
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Homestead, Fl.
Posts: 927
Thanks: 2
Thanked 14 Times in 13 Posts
|
Don't get me started on nuclear power, I thought it would be possible to compress a reactor to the size of a Rubic's Cube in order to power a vehicle that you could pass the power supply down from generation to generation ..
Ahhh to dream
Oh and how to protect it .. simple, make it out of the black box material on planes ... LOL
__________________
Thx NoCO2; "The biggest FE mod you can make is to adjust the nut behind the wheel"
I am a precisional instrument of speed and aeromatics
If your knees bent in the opposite direction......what would a chair look like???
|
|
|
08-14-2008, 08:42 PM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Sacramento, CA
Posts: 26
My GSR - '96 Acura Integra GSR 90 day: 35 mpg (US) My 500F - '04 Suzuki GS500F 90 day: 62.99 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
__________________
|
|
|
08-16-2008, 07:21 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Surrey UK
Posts: 45
Thanks: 0
Thanked 4 Times in 1 Post
|
I still have not found an answer to the original question but i have been thinking about this.
Even though water is a bigger green house gas its not as clear cut as that when it comes to global 'warming'. Some of you may be aware of something called global dimming. The effect was first really noticed in the US after 911 when all the flights were grounded.
There is a good documentary on it i watched a few years ago, i recommend
anyone thats interested in global warming watch it
If you go by some of that theory more water vapor that enters the air could produce more clouds to reflect light back into space it could just even things out if other pollutants are reduced its really impossible to hypothesize. It shows that its not as clear cut one might think.
|
|
|
08-16-2008, 07:43 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
PaulH
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Maricopa, AZ (sort of. Actually outside of town)
Posts: 3,832
Thanks: 1,362
Thanked 1,202 Times in 765 Posts
|
Nice video. Very interesting! I had never heard of global dimming.
|
|
|
|