04-18-2014, 05:23 AM
|
#11 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Missouri
Posts: 540
Thanks: 30
Thanked 190 Times in 110 Posts
|
My commute is 50 miles each way, 5 days a week. Going 60 vs 70, I spend an extra 86 hours behind the wheel each year. That's 10 minutes each way.
That may seem like a lot of wasted time, but considering I just watched 4 cat videos on YouTube, I think there are plenty of other things we can eliminate that are less productive than driving slower to save fuel. I know I save time, but honestly the challenge of getting good gas mileage is worth it (plus I save some $$).
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to cbaber For This Useful Post:
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 08:45 AM
|
#12 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Apprentice
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Greater Milwaukee area, Wisconsin
Posts: 157
Thanks: 46
Thanked 30 Times in 23 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by cbaber
My commute is 50 miles each way, 5 days a week. Going 60 vs 70, I spend an extra 86 hours behind the wheel each year. That's 10 minutes each way.
That may seem like a lot of wasted time, but considering I just watched 4 cat videos on YouTube, I think there are plenty of other things we can eliminate that are less productive than driving slower to save fuel. I know I save time, but honestly the challenge of getting good gas mileage is worth it (plus I save some $$).
|
For those of us with long commutes (35 miles each way, though I'll be moving closer soon), hypermiling is a good way to gamify our time spent in the car. It takes a great deal of boredom and stress out of the commute.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to The Other Andy For This Useful Post:
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:17 AM
|
#13 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Greater Chicago
Posts: 75
RAV4 - '16 Toyota RAV4 Hybrid Limited 90 day: 35.26 mpg (US)
Thanks: 6
Thanked 8 Times in 7 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by bestclimb
I have noted that when I try to hurry along at 65+ vs 60 max the total trip time does not change that much and there is a great deal more traffic. Lower in city speed and stop lights tends to dominate the average.
|
The longer the trip, the more savings there are to be had from speeding up. For example, a friend of mine and I were in a rush because we had an orchestra concert that ended at 10PM, a 2 hour drive (normal speed), and she had work at 6:30AM the next morning. By driving 90MPH, she cut 30 minutes off the 120-ish mile trip, but that's a longer drive than most commutes and significantly higher than "just 5MPH over."
When I drive 30 miles north to see friends, I've discovered the time difference between 55 and 70 is not worth it.
__________________
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:30 AM
|
#14 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Texas
Posts: 451
Thanks: 1,837
Thanked 127 Times in 106 Posts
|
I go with picking a place near where you work. My longest commute has been 80 miles one way (for three months until we could move) and the shortest 1.5 miles. Most have been bicycle or small motorcycle distance, thus saving the cost of a second car and all the gas for the commute. In northern VA I picked a place within walking distance to a metro station. Again saving gas and personal hassle. Look for work close to where you live or live close to where you work is a no brainer.
Now I have taken up the hypermiling techniques just to get around Texas...
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:42 AM
|
#15 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
I used to have a 10 minute commute on a 40mph highway; timing the lights could get me through almost the entire thing with only three or four stops.
Then I moved to a little town and my commute is about 25 minutes, 22.3 miles. I wouldn't switch back.
Loving where you live is worth a lot. I didn't like my old neighborhood. Now I'm walking distance to church, walking distance to a little village grocery store and the Post Office, walking distance to the town's library, my in-laws, my other in-laws, and lots of pleasant hikes.
Three of us carpool every day so we get to spend that half-hour or so catching up with each other. It isn't time wasted. If I didn't spend it driving, what would I be doing? Surfing the internet, watching TV? Riding with my wife and son are a good time.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 10:29 AM
|
#16 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NY state
Posts: 501
Thanks: 1
Thanked 51 Times in 38 Posts
|
My Taurus was a bit of an anomaly. I took it on many trips and had many, many tanks of gas on the highway.
It would do 34MPG at 70MPH. 65, 60, 55 were all 29. Never understood that.
I have exact numbers, but can't remember. The Focus seems to be:
55: 48
60: 45
65: 40
70: 35
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 10:56 AM
|
#17 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
|
It is 169 miles each way to my parents' house. I could drive 70, 75, or even 80. Many people do.
I drive fifty-five.
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 11:25 AM
|
#18 (permalink)
|
Master Novice
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SE USA - East Tennessee
Posts: 2,314
Thanks: 427
Thanked 616 Times in 450 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Miller88
My Taurus was a bit of an anomaly. I took it on many trips and had many, many tanks of gas on the highway.
It would do 34MPG at 70MPH. 65, 60, 55 were all 29. Never understood that.
I have exact numbers, but can't remember. The Focus seems to be:
55: 48
60: 45
65: 40
70: 35
|
That bottom-bracket first-gen Taurus could be a long-legged cruiser. With the four-pot and the five speed, once you got it up to speed - eventually - you could motor along in the fat part of the torque band and have a pretty relaxed trip.
__________________
Lead or follow. Either is fine.
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 12:35 PM
|
#19 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,173
Thanks: 1,739
Thanked 589 Times in 401 Posts
|
I've started driving 80 km/h (50 mph) as our local highways have a 100 km/h (62 mph) upper limit and a 60 km/h (37.5 mph) lower limit.
I'd go 60, but some cars do terribly at that... many seem geared for best economy between 70 and 80, so using an 80 reference point, I'm swinging between 70-90, depending on whether I'm going uphill or downhill.
Give our gas costs about $4.40 a gallon, I actually save between two to four dollars (depending on what I'm driving) on my 50 mile commute into the city when I have to go to the magazine or visit the in-laws. Granted, I get free fuel most of the time, but I dislike wasting gas when I don't have to.
|
|
|
04-18-2014, 09:16 PM
|
#20 (permalink)
|
Intermediate EcoDriver
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Northern Arizona - It's a DRY cold..
Posts: 671
Thanks: 163
Thanked 129 Times in 102 Posts
|
I tried driving from Barstow to Flagstaff at 65 MPH last Summer instead of the 70 MPH(California)and 75 MPH(Arizona) speed limit as I drove the trip the previous two years.
Compared to the previous two years, I got 32.9 MPG vs 27.9 MPG.
The speed difference cost me 35 minutes over 350 miles.
The drive was less stressful. Yes, it was worth the extra time. I had enough fuel left over to commute to work for three days.
__________________
Fuel economy is nice, but sometimes I just gotta put the spurs to my pony!
Quote:
Originally Posted by thatguitarguy
Just 'cuz you can't do it, don't mean it can't be done...
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by elhigh
The presence of traffic is the single most complicating factor of hypermiling. I know what I'm going to do, it's contending with whatever the hell all these other people are going to do that makes things hard.
|
Last edited by Mustang Dave; 04-18-2014 at 09:23 PM..
|
|
|
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Mustang Dave For This Useful Post:
|
|
|