Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2010, 12:14 AM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
ChopsQube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St Pete, FL
Posts: 55

Nissan Cube - '10 Nissan Cube Base
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

The BRG - '91 Mazda Miata SE
90 day: 35.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Lean-burning engine... (what vehicles have them?)

This may be a silly question, but how do you know if a car has a lean burning technology engine? I've looked all around and really can't find anything about the engine in the Cube.

Any ideas?

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-11-2010, 07:16 AM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,586 Times in 1,554 Posts
Its not lean burn. Its very rare to find a lean burn engine. The Civic VX, HX, 1st gen Civic hybrid (manual trans), and 1st gen Insight hybrid (manual trans) were probably the most popular. Other mfgs have made lean burn variants, but nothing that works as well. I believe gascort said his early 90s escort may have had a mild lean burn mode... All diesels run lean. Toyota has had lean burn engines, but nothing ever sold in the US. Other than that though, I'm not aware of any lean burn engines (I'm sure there are a couple, but not many). No vehicles being sold today have lean burn capability due to NOx emissions problems.
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 10:06 AM   #3 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
ChopsQube's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: St Pete, FL
Posts: 55

Nissan Cube - '10 Nissan Cube Base
90 day: 33.35 mpg (US)

The BRG - '91 Mazda Miata SE
90 day: 35.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Well that stinks. Thanks for the reply though. It's much appreciated.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2010, 11:18 AM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
I know that some of the corvets and silverados have the feature programed in the PCM but the switch for it is set to 0=disable some programmers can change the switch to turn it on.
__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 12:46 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
texanidiot25's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Cypress, TX
Posts: 331

Formula - '96 Firebird Formula/Trans-Am
90 day: 19.31 mpg (US)
Thanks: 8
Thanked 31 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
Its not lean burn. Its very rare to find a lean burn engine. The Civic VX, HX, 1st gen Civic hybrid (manual trans), and 1st gen Insight hybrid (manual trans) were probably the most popular. Other mfgs have made lean burn variants, but nothing that works as well. I believe gascort said his early 90s escort may have had a mild lean burn mode... All diesels run lean. Toyota has had lean burn engines, but nothing ever sold in the US. Other than that though, I'm not aware of any lean burn engines (I'm sure there are a couple, but not many). No vehicles being sold today have lean burn capability due to NOx emissions problems.
And CRX HF and older CVCC-head Hondas were a lean burning carb setup.
__________________


Lets see how far it can go

"All I know about music is that not many people ever really hear it. [...] But the man who creates the music is hearing something else, is dealing with the roar rising from the void and imposing order on it as it hits the air. What is evoked in him, then, is of another order, more terrible because it has no words, and triumphant, too, for the same reason. And his triumph, when he triumphs, is ours." -Sonny's Blues
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 07:47 AM   #6 (permalink)
Left Lane Ecodriver
 
RobertSmalls's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Buffalo, NY, USA
Posts: 2,257

Prius C - '12 Toyota Prius C
Thanks: 79
Thanked 286 Times in 199 Posts
Ford messed around with lean burn V8's in the 1970's. The Ford Proco Engine Update . They had direction injection, stratified charge, two plugs per cylinder, and EGR to reduce NOx. AFAIK, the engines never made it into any production vehicles.

http://www.blueovalforums.com/forums...-proco-engine/

Just like Toyota, Nissan dabbled in lean burn, but never sold any such cars in America.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wikipedia
The QG engine is a 1.3 L, 1.5 L, 1.6 L, 1.8 L, and 2.0 L straight-4 piston engine from Nissan. It is a lean-burn aluminum DOHC 4-valve design with variable valve timing and optional NEO Di direct injection. The QG engines were designed for Nissan by Aichi Machine Industry.
Nissan QG engine - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I don't know how lean these engines burned or how much gas they saved.
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 07:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Randallstown, MD
Posts: 29

95 SL1 5spd - '95 Saturn SL1
90 day: 41.18 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
i believe there were some early 80s to early 90s chrysler engines that used lean burn technology
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2010, 07:53 PM   #8 (permalink)
Jeep Ecomodder
 
JeepNmpg2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Georgia
Posts: 160

Daddy's Jeep - '00 Jeep Cherokee SE
90 day: 19.66 mpg (US)

Mama's Kia - '06 Kia Sedona LX
Thanks: 16
Thanked 24 Times in 13 Posts
89 Plymouth - maybe lean burn?

I seem to remember my old 89 Plymouth getting strangely good MPG for it's time at 35+ MPG on the highway as a "midsize" for it's time with a 3.0 V6. It wasn't a very attractive car inside or out, but it ran like a champ, and I saw it on the road a few months ago, still not smoking or anything! I should've kept the thing...... :X but I needed something bigger (my minivan)
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-13-2010, 09:54 PM   #9 (permalink)
sid
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 202

grayranger - '10 Ford Ranger XL 2 door supercab
90 day: 31.78 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 48 Times in 28 Posts
When I worked for Chrysler as a design engineer back in the late 1970's, we were working on lean burn engines. But we were having a lot of problems getting them to pass emissions tests. Nitrogen oxides (NOXs) were the big problem. They also tended to burn up catalytic converters if we tried to add them to cars. They may have fixed those problems after I left. But I also think the Feds tightened pollution standards since then, too, which effectively killed all lean burn vehicles in the US.

One reason the same cars in the US get poorer fuel economy than in other countries is that we have different pollution standards. Our standards are optimized to reduce smog and carcinogens. Other countries tend to optimize for minimum greenhouse gases. Optimizing for minimum greenhouse gases usually gets much better fuel economy than optimizing for minimum smog. It is hard to get the EPA to reconsider their pollution requirements, especially since some places in the US still have occasional smog problems.
__________________
2010 Ford Ranger, extra cab, 2.3 liter
http://www.stonemarmot.com

Band's latest song/music video "I Sing Along"

Last edited by sid; 06-13-2010 at 09:58 PM.. Reason: grammar
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to sid For This Useful Post:
RobertSmalls (06-13-2010)
Old 06-13-2010, 11:23 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
gascort's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Saint Louis, MO
Posts: 548

Gascort RIP - '93 Ford Escort Wagon
90 day: 43.01 mpg (US)

WifesCruze - '11 Chevrolet Cruze LT
90 day: 31.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 14
Thanked 25 Times in 16 Posts
It seems strange that vehicles had trouble passing NOx regulations using lean burn. In St. Louis we used to have sniffer - style smog testing, and there's no way most of the lean burn vehicles would enter lean burn mode during that test from what I remember; it was a steady acceleration and then sustained load on the engine at some speed (I don't remember).
Perhaps to get a specific model released by the EPA they did more extensive tests than what they do to individual vehicles???
I have all the previous owner's emissions tests on my escort and the tests for CO2, CO, and NOx are all WAY below the standards. But my car only runs lean at real light load on the highway, like 50-65 mph on flat roads (with my aero stuff strapped on).

__________________
Gasoline, Wind, Solar, Gravity Hybrid-to-be! http://www.scientificmethodfueleconomy.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Chrysler Expected To Kill Models, Bring Italian Vehicles Ashore Jammer The Lounge 17 06-26-2010 07:29 PM
Mercedes diesel non electronic oldbeaver Instrumentation 8 03-04-2010 02:32 AM
New 2-stroke Diesel engine, cool link to Engineering TV metromizer General Efficiency Discussion 14 11-17-2008 08:05 PM
Coasting experiment: engine on VS engine off on a fixed route = 12.9% gain MetroMPG Hypermiling / EcoDriver's Ed 6 02-22-2008 08:38 AM
Basic EcoDriving Techniques and Instrumentation SVOboy Instrumentation 2 11-17-2007 11:38 AM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com