Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-13-2015, 02:21 AM   #71 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,186

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 29.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,225
Thanked 2,217 Times in 1,708 Posts
Unfortunately, it sounds like an attorney would be greatly useful, but bringing up that does not seem helpful.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-13-2015, 03:17 AM   #72 (permalink)
Corporate imperialist
 
oil pan 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: NewMexico (USA)
Posts: 11,185

Sub - '84 Chevy Diesel Suburban C10
SUV
90 day: 19.5 mpg (US)

camaro - '85 Chevy Camaro Z28

Riot - '03 Kia Rio POS
Team Hyundai
90 day: 30.21 mpg (US)

Bug - '01 VW Beetle GLSturbo
90 day: 26.43 mpg (US)

Sub2500 - '86 GMC Suburban C2500
90 day: 11.95 mpg (US)

Snow flake - '11 Nissan Leaf SL
SUV
90 day: 141.63 mpg (US)
Thanks: 270
Thanked 3,528 Times in 2,802 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redyaris View Post
Step one if you deside to go to court is get "disclosure" from the crown prosecutors office. Then see what he has as evidence. study the law he used, then look up precedents if there are any... not likely... the first hearing will be used to see if you will plead guilty if they drop the fine in half. then you will work out a trial date. At trial you should be ready to present your case "on the evidence".
What is most likely is that the cop will not show up and the crown will withdraw the charges at the very last moment...
I am not a lawer but have defended myself in court... successfully.

...should have read the whole thing first...
That's how it works here too.
Your best bet at beating a ticket is for the cop to not show.
__________________
1984 chevy suburban, custom made 6.5L diesel turbocharged with a Garrett T76 and Holset HE351VE, 22:1 compression 13psi of intercooled boost.
1989 firebird mostly stock. Aside from the 6-speed manual trans, corvette gen 5 front brakes, 1LE drive shaft, 4th Gen disc brake fbody rear end.
2011 leaf SL, white, portable 240v CHAdeMO, trailer hitch, new batt as of 2014.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-13-2015, 10:48 AM   #73 (permalink)
Liberty Lover
 
j12piprius's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: central california
Posts: 587

pris prius - '12 Toyota plug in prius
90 day: 71.09 mpg (US)
Thanks: 439
Thanked 83 Times in 60 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WD40 View Post
I got a $109 fine for obstructing my tailights , I had clear plexi to cover the sides so as to make the kamback more aero.
Since the plexi was fine, did the inspector say how to avoid tickets from using it?
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2015, 09:38 AM   #74 (permalink)
EcoMod Proof of Concept
 
WD40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245

WD-40's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 56.04 mpg (US)

WD-40's Mirage - '15 Mitsubushi Mirage ES
Mitsubishi
90 day: 46.05 mpg (US)

WD-40's Sonata Hybrid - '17 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Limited
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
I asked the inspector about the plexi, it didn't bother him. but agreed that it did break the law as it is written.
Solution is to move the lights as far back as possible, which was my original plan, but opening the tailgate would not be possible without hitting the lights, that's why I opted for the plexi.
The only way moving the lights would have worked is to widen the near rear end of the car.
Meantime I'm still waiting to get my car back and on the road.
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to WD40 For This Useful Post:
j12piprius (03-14-2015)
Old 03-14-2015, 11:40 AM   #75 (permalink)
EcoMod Proof of Concept
 
WD40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245

WD-40's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 56.04 mpg (US)

WD-40's Mirage - '15 Mitsubushi Mirage ES
Mitsubishi
90 day: 46.05 mpg (US)

WD-40's Sonata Hybrid - '17 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Limited
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
Wow I am just reading the motor vehicle act for B.C.

Powers of peace officer

25.30 (1) If a peace officer has reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a vehicle is, by reason of mechanical, structural or other defect, unsafe for use on a highway, whether or not the vehicle meets the standards prescribed under the Act, he or she may order the owner or operator of the vehicle, either immediately or within such time as is specified in the order, to do one or both of the following:

(a) remove it from the highway and keep it so removed until either

(i) repairs as may be set out in the order of the peace officer have been implemented, or

(ii) the peace officer revokes the order;

(b) surrender the vehicle license or number plates, or both, for that vehicle to the corporation or to the peace officer.

So they literally can take your car off the road permanently even if it passes every ACT.

The other thing I read is that no temporary insurance can be placed on a car that has failed the test. However ..
25.13
(3) If the authorized person is not satisfied that the vehicle meets the standards, he or she may, on being satisfied that the vehicle would not present a hazard to other road users, place on the vehicle an interim inspection certificate and must indicate on the inspection report issued under subsection (1)
(4) An interim inspection certificate expires 14 days after the time of issue.

All this is great ... however as usual nobody you talk to knows all or in some cases anything regarding these issues.
I was told by the inspector that I can't drive my car home until its passed, when infact he could give it the interim pass, at least as far as the rust is concerned.
The its the rust question.. How is rust, which can only be placed under the Body Exterior/Protruding Metal section of the test considered a hazard to other road users.

I called my insurance broker to ask about temp insurance to drive a failed car home to fix, they thought for sure it was ok but to call ICBC the provincial motor vehicle insurance company and ask them.
So I did, asked the same question, they said as long as the cars current insurance was still active I could drive it as is .. no temp required... Both answers are incorrect
Then he asked for my DL # just to see what if anything was actually listed against my car, guess what .. nothing was listed .. this was 13 days after i was issued the notice and fine.
They told me that sometimes the cops don't actually file the paperwork.
So in my case I am jumping through all these hoops for is personal amusement.
I told all this to the inspector and he confirmed it all... WTF
Anyways the leaking oil onto the exhaust was a valid safety issue as it could start a fire, but the rust I mean really.
The inspector said he would probably just pass the car after the leak is fixed.
Bottom line read and reread the motor vehicle act for your area.
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2015, 07:35 PM   #76 (permalink)
Mister Miserly MPG Miser
 
Littlestan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Chilliwack
Posts: 8
Thanks: 1
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Absolutely ridiculous! As all the officer seen was the external modifications and
some rust, then never filed anything in the end, it leaves you wondering who pissed in his cornflakes that day.

On a positive note, this is primo information in the event I run into some problems with the law. Will definitely be checking to see if anything was filed officially before taking the next step.
__________________
L₁ = t - (W+S)
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-14-2015, 11:33 PM   #77 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
wow man, WTF!
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 12:22 AM   #78 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by WD40 View Post
sometimes the cops don't actually file the paperwork.
So in my case I am jumping through all these hoops for is personal amusement
What are you going to do about it? Is there any way to put that cop under scrutiny?

Last edited by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr; 03-15-2015 at 12:31 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2015, 09:33 AM   #79 (permalink)
EcoMod Proof of Concept
 
WD40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Chilliwack B.C. CANADA
Posts: 245

WD-40's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
Team Honda
90 day: 56.04 mpg (US)

WD-40's Mirage - '15 Mitsubushi Mirage ES
Mitsubishi
90 day: 46.05 mpg (US)

WD-40's Sonata Hybrid - '17 Hyundai Sonata Hybrid Limited
Thanks: 81
Thanked 85 Times in 45 Posts
What would the point of the complaint be ..
Either way I would still have to go through the inspection.
1)notice says go
2)complain and still have to go
If he sees my car again I get pulled over and he sees no inspection sticker and paperwork, now he can nail me with failure to inspect and I get a $598 fine.
He will just hand in the paperwork that is still dated the day it first occurred.
__________________
2000 Insight MT 106K Citrus A/C
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2015, 09:06 AM   #80 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
Laws that allow for discretion are actually a good thing. On one hand, they let hackers be creative in areas where there isn't a specific prohibition, and on the other hand they let authorities squash things that were so obvious that nobody thought to pass a law against them.

It doesn't look like WD40 is being stomped by overbearing authority here- Dudley gave WD40 an off the record "this car is all kinds of wrong" warning and a few weeks later wrote him the smallest ticket he could while still sending him to a garage for an inspection. Now that the garage has it, they're big fans of the aeromods but can't issue a roadworthiness sticker because of other issues. The other issues are the real problem here.

Random garages and insurance salesmen not being able to walk you through a rare situation isn't a surprise, and it's not the cop's fault here either. The system expects cars to get fixed at the garage, and it probably also expects people to be in for regularly scheduled inspections instead of being sent there by the police with registrations provisionally revoked.

Odds are, once the car gets a fresh inspection sticker it's good to go. At least on that car, it'd probably be best to integrate lighting to the mods in the future, just to avoid problems:


__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com