09-23-2008, 09:52 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Kampsville
Posts: 77
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
|
Metro hatchback vs sedan
on the metro, the sedan has a better CD than the hatchback, for my mostly 55 mph driving wouldnt the sedan be better than the hatchback.
|
|
|
|
 Today
|
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 09:58 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
obviously, if indeed it is lower coefficient of drag and same area.
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
09-23-2008, 11:15 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
|
Renaissance Man
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: In the Northeast dreaming of the Southwest
Posts: 596
Thanks: 20
Thanked 31 Times in 24 Posts
|
Isn't the sedan only available with the four cylinder 1.3L? If so this would probably more than offset any aero gains.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
09-24-2008, 02:36 AM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Oregon
Posts: 558
Thanks: 258
Thanked 200 Times in 158 Posts
|
I put a 3-banger in my sedan. It is getting a consistent 53 mpg, while waiting for the xfi cam from 3tech. 
__________________
02 Saturn L200 5 speed- 265k miles
84 Gmc 6.5 na diesel K30 4x4, TMU
2006 Lincoln Navigator, 215k miles
|
|
|
|
|
09-24-2008, 07:19 AM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
|
needs more cowbell
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: ÿ
Posts: 5,038
Thanks: 158
Thanked 269 Times in 212 Posts
|
Nice 
__________________
WINDMILLS DO NOT WORK THAT WAY!!!
|
|
|
|
|
09-24-2008, 07:31 AM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
|
Hi-Tech Redneck
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ashtabula, Ohio
Posts: 1,436
Thanks: 6
Thanked 49 Times in 42 Posts
|
I knew eventually someone would slap a 3 banger into a sedan
Nice job.
__________________
GeoMetroforum.com - got mpg?
|
|
|
|
|
01-27-2009, 12:30 AM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
|
In hypermiler central
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: UC Berkeley
Posts: 230
Thanks: 55
Thanked 6 Times in 3 Posts
|
After buying my Mazda last fall, I thought I had gotten the Metro bug out of my system, but I often find myself searching Craigslist for a Metro. I'm trying to find the perfect Metro, and I keep running across 3rd gen Metro manual sedans.
I'm hoping to find an I4 Metro with a bad engine, which I will replace with an I3. I will keep the I4 transmission with the higher final drive. If we compare an I3 sedan to an I3 hatchback, is the sedan (lower Cd) more efficient despite the slightly higher weight?
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2009, 12:10 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
|
Batman Junior
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,530
Thanks: 4,078
Thanked 6,978 Times in 3,613 Posts
|
At highway speeds, yes, it should be more efficient due to reduced aero drag.
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2009, 12:12 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
|
Administrator
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,587 Times in 1,554 Posts
|
What is the Cd for the sedan vs hatch?
|
|
|
|
|
02-09-2009, 01:34 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
|
EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: North Central Alabama
Posts: 572
Thanks: 110
Thanked 123 Times in 71 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox
What is the Cd for the sedan vs hatch?
|
If I remember correctly it's 0.32 (sedan) 0.34 (hatch). I get around 50 mpg to and from work when it's nice out, and I have the I4 engine in a Suzuki Swift. If my engine ever dies I wouldn't mind swapping an I3 into it, but I would really want to get my Cd down before doing so.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
