Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-24-2013, 09:04 AM   #91 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
"payback" for mods to already very efficient vehicles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Daox View Post
How much money do you have into this?
This got me thinking again about the numbers, and the inevitable suggestions to mass produce.

Let's say you could figure out a way to make and sell copies of this tail for $500 apiece. With U.S. gas prices at $3.61, the payback of going from 99 to 109 mpg (US) is a mere...

155,698 miles / 250,571 km

Of course if you halve the cost, or double fuel prices, you halve the payback period/distance.

Food for thought anyway, if financial issues are your main motivation for modding.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
Rokeby (04-24-2013)
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-24-2013, 09:52 AM   #92 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
Love your work.

Thinking of the fundamentally parsimonious nature -- strong tendency to
lowest possible cost ;-) -- of typical Ecomodder...

What would it cost to provide dimensioned drawings of the support
structure, skin pieces, and mounting method for DIYers?

Then they could make one like yours, and then decide if they wanted to
continue and invest in making their own one-off, lower cost, hard skin
version.

Last edited by Rokeby; 04-24-2013 at 10:02 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 09:58 AM   #93 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
Well, if you start with the EPA rating, then the payback period is much shorter. You're already ecodriving, so that is "free", and you are already saving that money, so if you spend $500 of that savings, and increase your savings then you have already paid for it. If you were not already ecodriving, then the savings from the boattail would be quicker, because the baseline is lower and you would be spending a lot more on gas.

Does that make sense?

How much would the materials to make a weather proof version cost?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 10:22 AM   #94 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
Rokeby: yup, a "kit/plan approach" is probably the only practical approach.

You could duplicate this tail by simply replacing the cardboard with coroplast, then paint the outside to UV-protect it. That would make it durable. Could even retain the "scrap wood" frame.

It might take two or three 4 x 8 sheets (rough guess) and might require some different attachment methods. (EG. the hot glue gun may not be the most appropriate way to make a durable plastic version!)
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 10:52 AM   #95 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
HyperMileQC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Laval, QC
Posts: 528

Trollinsight (Retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 68.06 mpg (US)

Redsight - '01 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights

Carole - '05 Toyota Corolla Xrs
Team Toyota

Brise-Fer - '05 Toyota Echo
Team Toyota
Thanks: 311
Thanked 93 Times in 69 Posts
Send a message via MSN to HyperMileQC
What differences in wind noise did you noticed when rolling at 100 km/h with the boattail? Did you feel a good difference in coasting?
__________________
Trollinsight Modding Thread

2000 Honda Insight MT Silverstone Metallic #95 (CAN) 131K mi. 81.7 Lmpg
Best Tank : 100.06 MPG (US) | 120.2 MPG (Imp) | 2.35 L/100Km | 42.54 Km/L
Best commute : 130.8 MPG (US) | 157.1 MPG (Imp) | 1.8 L/100Km | 54.84 Km/L
Best Trip : 111.8 MPG (US) | 134.3 MPG (Imp) | 2.1 L/100Km | 47.53 Km/L
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 11:30 AM   #96 (permalink)
Gen II Prianista
 
Rokeby's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Ballamer, Merlin
Posts: 453
Thanks: 201
Thanked 146 Times in 89 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
You could duplicate this tail by simply replacing the cardboard with coroplast, then paint the outside to UV-protect it. That would make it durable. Could even retain the "scrap wood" frame.

It might take two or three 4 x 8 sheets (rough guess) and might require some different attachment methods. (EG. the hot glue gun may not be the most appropriate way to make a durable plastic version!)
Good Points.

One thing in favor of cardboard as a first step is it could be gotten for free. I would look for double or triple corrugated stock at appliance retailers; Best Buy, Sears, etc.

There's hot glue and then there's HOT GLUE. Most hot glue that you see is low-mid range temperature for hobby use. Then there's high temp hot glue, allegedly has higher holding strength. IIRC, it is only available in the larger 1/2 inch diameter, longer sticks. And yes, it's really hot, quite painful, it will instantly cause blisters on your skin. Keep away from children.

[Edit: WIth the following structure, it may be possible that the wooden interior framework is not needed. But, care would be needed at the attachemnt points for the hold-on straps; Sizeable pads with a srewed through backing piece on the otherside of the cardboard. This because the face ply of cardboard is just glued to the interior corrugations. Any pulls outward from the face ply risks failure due tension/shear between the two pieces.

On further thought, the following is also applicable to Coroplast construction with a few additional considerations. (A heads-up here. I have not yet actually used Coroplast, ;-0 Caveat Emptor, etc.)
* I would use the old-style non-waterbased contact cement for the flanged/tabbed joints.
* I would rough-up the areas to be glued on both pieces with 100-150 grit sand paper to provide some 'tooth,' just to add some additional grab.
* I would double-up the two main fore-aft bulkheads -- walls -- and two crosswise buldheads located near the front and back of the structure. I'd have the corrugations crossing at 90 deg. I'd join the two pieces of Coroplast with glue on their complete joining faces.]

Thinking of longevity of both cardboard or Coroplast structures...

In my earlier post, I indicated that there are ways to significantly improve the strength of joints where pieces meet at or near 90 deg in the inside of the structure. The intention is to increase the glueing area between the two pieces. Here's a little more info that I think would be helpful:

* The first method of joint strength improvement is to include material at the appropriate edge of an interior piece so that a flange or tab can be bent over where it meets the exterior piece. I'd say 1 to 1-1/2 inch wide. (It is best to layout pieces so that the flanges/tabs occur on the side of the piece that run parallel to the corrugations. The flange or tab should be cut into 6 inch or so inch lengths. Bend alternating tabs to either side.This helps assure that you have time to get each tab bent over enough to be flat to the external surface and not induce local distortion in the skin.

* Second level of joint strength improvement is to double the glueing area of the method above is to add additional material at the the edge of the interior piece to create continuous flanges/tabs on both sides of the piece. This additional piece would be about 3 inches wide; 1-1/2 inch for glueing to the piece and 1-1/2 inch for the flange. Again, you would cut the flange/tabs into 6" or so lengths to simplify glueing and minimize the chance of exterior surface distortion. This method mightbe used instead of the first method for single side flanges/tabs. All in all in may prove easier to do, especially lay-out, at only the cost of some small amount of glue.

Sometimes you should have flanges/tabs on two adjacent edges of an interior piece where one edge shows the ends of the corrugations. It is a PITA to bend flanges/tabs here. This can be overcome by using the second method above, even if the intermittent flanges/tabs of the first method will be used. You have to cut clearance notches where the flanges/tabs are bent across the edge of the base piece.

It is not typically necessary to have flanges where two internal pieces cross in what I call an "egg crate joint." These are joints where each piece has a long notch cut halfway along the length of the joints from opposing ends so that the pieces can be slid together. (Cut the notches so that they are a tightish fit.) All that is typically needed is a bead of glue run down one or both sides of the completed joint.

You might consider adding flanges/tabs to egg crate joints where the interior structure is fastened to the cardboard nearby. The interior structure should contact the cardboard on a hard, low deflecting pad say 1/4 inch plywood. I'd say 3"x3" as a minimum would do, larger if you see fit.

I would waterproof the cardboard both inside and out, In long term use it is quite possible, even probable, that from time to time there will be condensation on the inside of the structure. It will be necessary to close-up the openings in any corrugations in exposed ends/edges. I have used strips of heavy craft paper for this. If you can get them, paper shopping bags are excellent and free.

Afterthought: The above comes from my experience as a boat builder. It reflects a cardboard boat's use in/on the water, especially high point loadings and the immediately destructive nature of water intrusion. Some may see parts of it rising to the level of overkill for automotive applications... but I don't think so. As always YMMV ;-)

Last edited by Rokeby; 04-24-2013 at 04:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Rokeby For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (04-24-2013), wyatt (04-25-2013)
Old 04-24-2013, 11:33 AM   #97 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 27,695
Thanks: 7,775
Thanked 8,584 Times in 7,068 Posts
Congratulations. Given the sample size, you could just round it up to 10%. That suggests ~20% improvement in Cd.

Good job.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 04:14 PM   #98 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Blue Angel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Ottawa, ON, Canada
Posts: 190

Previous Car - '12 Chevrolet Cruze Eco MT
Team Chevy
90 day: 44.29 mpg (US)

535d XDrive - '16 BMW 535d M-Sport
Thanks: 17
Thanked 59 Times in 38 Posts
Curious, do you plan to A-B-A test at higher speeds? If this is worth 10% at 50 MPH, what's it worth at highway speeds where many people spend a lot of time? Your pay back calculations might be more favorable, though probably still long.
__________________
2016 BMW 535d
4100lb XDrive Eco-Yacht
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 04:19 PM   #99 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
You're right: it should be worth a bigger % savings at higher speeds.

No plan to re-test though. I almost always take the scenic route, so most of my driving is around the tested 80 km/h limit.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2013, 05:40 PM   #100 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,515

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 52.48 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,062
Thanked 6,960 Times in 3,604 Posts
I updated this thread's first post with a "project summary", including stats about the tail (curves/angles, length etc.). Still need to weigh it and get side angles - will get to that after supper tonight.

__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com