06-08-2013, 12:12 AM
|
#191 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Quote:
I bet adding those would probably help the U.F.O.'s aero, and if doing so means the underside of the tail then technically becomes a diffuser (if un-befinned), so be it!
|
Difflow use 5 -7 fences. I suspect they channel turbulent air and equalize it across the rear.
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
06-08-2013, 02:00 AM
|
#192 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder
|
Yes, but it seems without "fins" like I think Metro is referring to, right? Here is another angle that I don't think is in the thread you linked to... but maybe that open box/wing thing is about the same idea as "fins."
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
06-08-2013, 02:45 PM
|
#193 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
Strakes? Fins? Fences?
We need a Glossary.
Skegs?
|
|
|
06-08-2013, 04:14 PM
|
#194 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,268
Thanks: 24,393
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
|
solar car
Quote:
Originally Posted by jime57
I tend to agree with you overall observations. I was just kicking the idea around.
Formula 1 cars have been productively using various diffuser fins for several years now, but I'm not sure that the 150-175 MPH difference in speed makes that comparison relevant.
And, yes I remember seeing that solar car. As I recall, the fins were small and at the very rear.
|
That might have been the 1987 GM/AeroVironment SunRaycer.
Crosswind stability near the Australian land trains was a prerequisite for racing qualification and that car had already 'flown'.
The 'strakes' added under the tail were a solution which Dr.Alberto Morelli had come up with in 1978 with the CNR 'banana' car.The stabilizing tailfin was placed low,behind the wheels to mitigate a roll-moment,while moving the center-of-pressure well aft,giving it a nice weather-vaning.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
|
|
|
06-08-2013, 11:23 PM
|
#195 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,907
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,950 Times in 1,844 Posts
|
My CarBEN EV5 has a three straight diffuser fins, though I have no idea if they wil help or hurt or be meaningless. They provide downforce, I think? I'm hoping that the fins on CarBEN will "straighten out" the air flow so that it swirls less as it exits - maybe?
|
|
|
06-09-2013, 02:33 AM
|
#196 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,557
Thanks: 8,092
Thanked 8,881 Times in 7,329 Posts
|
My understanding would be that the downforce would be affected by the angle of the plate/bottom of the boattail. There is a diagram that indicates the angle is sensitive to the upper rear body shape (which I apparently don't have), i.e., fast/notch/kamm-back, over a range IIRC of 0-10°.
I agree they would reduce turbulence, but I'm curious about how they act in cross-wind conditions. And I think Difflow is onto something with the fan shape.
[post contains much opinion]
|
|
|
06-09-2013, 08:18 AM
|
#197 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard
My understanding would be that the downforce would be affected by the angle of the plate/bottom of the boattail. There is a diagram that indicates the angle is sensitive to the upper rear body shape (which I apparently don't have), i.e., fast/notch/kamm-back, over a range IIRC of 0-10°.
|
Is this the graphic/table you are referring to?
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
|
|
|
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2013, 11:53 AM
|
#198 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic
Is this the graphic/table you are referring to?
|
I think that is it! Will someone please explain it to me?
|
|
|
06-09-2013, 01:17 PM
|
#199 (permalink)
|
Cyborg ECU
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist
I think that is it! Will someone please explain it to me?
|
Maybe. Let's see: Cx is another way of noting Cd. The "Y" axis, therefore, is measuring change in Cd (Cx) +/- and the "X" axis is charting different angles for the different body shapes' diffusers. Body shape A and B are shown to have their best diffuser angels at 3 or 4 degrees and the wagon ("C") seems just to suffer.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.
Last edited by California98Civic; 06-12-2013 at 08:23 PM..
Reason: three intrusive typos (shakes fist at spelling gods)
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
|
|
06-09-2013, 08:50 PM
|
#200 (permalink)
|
Not Doug
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,232
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,231 Times in 1,721 Posts
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic
Maybe. Let's see: Cx is another way of noting Cd. The "Y" axis, therefore is measuring change in Cd (Cx) +/- and the "X" axis si charting different angles for the different body shape's diffusers. Body shape A and B are shown to have their best diffuser angels at 3 or 4 degrees and the wagon ("C") seems just to suffer.
|
So, once again, I am doomed?
|
|
|
|