Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 06-08-2013, 12:12 AM   #191 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,737
Thanks: 8,158
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
Quote:
I bet adding those would probably help the U.F.O.'s aero, and if doing so means the underside of the tail then technically becomes a diffuser (if un-befinned), so be it!


Difflow use 5 -7 fences. I suspect they channel turbulent air and equalize it across the rear.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 06-08-2013, 02:00 AM   #192 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by euromodder View Post
Yes, but it seems without "fins" like I think Metro is referring to, right? Here is another angle that I don't think is in the thread you linked to... but maybe that open box/wing thing is about the same idea as "fins."

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 02:45 PM   #193 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,737
Thanks: 8,158
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
Strakes? Fins? Fences?

We need a Glossary.

Skegs?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 04:14 PM   #194 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,320
Thanks: 24,442
Thanked 7,387 Times in 4,784 Posts
solar car

Quote:
Originally Posted by jime57 View Post
I tend to agree with you overall observations. I was just kicking the idea around.

Formula 1 cars have been productively using various diffuser fins for several years now, but I'm not sure that the 150-175 MPH difference in speed makes that comparison relevant.

And, yes I remember seeing that solar car. As I recall, the fins were small and at the very rear.
That might have been the 1987 GM/AeroVironment SunRaycer.
Crosswind stability near the Australian land trains was a prerequisite for racing qualification and that car had already 'flown'.
The 'strakes' added under the tail were a solution which Dr.Alberto Morelli had come up with in 1978 with the CNR 'banana' car.The stabilizing tailfin was placed low,behind the wheels to mitigate a roll-moment,while moving the center-of-pressure well aft,giving it a nice weather-vaning.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-08-2013, 11:23 PM   #195 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
NeilBlanchard's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Maynard, MA Eaarth
Posts: 7,908

Mica Blue - '05 Scion xA RS 2.0
Team Toyota
90 day: 42.48 mpg (US)

Forest - '15 Nissan Leaf S
Team Nissan
90 day: 156.46 mpg (US)

Number 7 - '15 VW e-Golf SEL
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 155.81 mpg (US)
Thanks: 3,475
Thanked 2,952 Times in 1,845 Posts
My CarBEN EV5 has a three straight diffuser fins, though I have no idea if they wil help or hurt or be meaningless. They provide downforce, I think? I'm hoping that the fins on CarBEN will "straighten out" the air flow so that it swirls less as it exits - maybe?
__________________
Sincerely, Neil

http://neilblanchard.blogspot.com/
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 02:33 AM   #196 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,737
Thanks: 8,158
Thanked 8,938 Times in 7,380 Posts
My understanding would be that the downforce would be affected by the angle of the plate/bottom of the boattail. There is a diagram that indicates the angle is sensitive to the upper rear body shape (which I apparently don't have), i.e., fast/notch/kamm-back, over a range IIRC of 0-10°.

I agree they would reduce turbulence, but I'm curious about how they act in cross-wind conditions. And I think Difflow is onto something with the fan shape.

[post contains much opinion]
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 08:18 AM   #197 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
My understanding would be that the downforce would be affected by the angle of the plate/bottom of the boattail. There is a diagram that indicates the angle is sensitive to the upper rear body shape (which I apparently don't have), i.e., fast/notch/kamm-back, over a range IIRC of 0-10°.
Is this the graphic/table you are referring to?

__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-12-2013), freebeard (06-09-2013), PaleMelanesian (06-10-2013)
Old 06-09-2013, 11:53 AM   #198 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Is this the graphic/table you are referring to?
I think that is it! Will someone please explain it to me?
  Reply With Quote
Old 06-09-2013, 01:17 PM   #199 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,174 Times in 1,470 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
I think that is it! Will someone please explain it to me?
Maybe. Let's see: Cx is another way of noting Cd. The "Y" axis, therefore, is measuring change in Cd (Cx) +/- and the "X" axis is charting different angles for the different body shapes' diffusers. Body shape A and B are shown to have their best diffuser angels at 3 or 4 degrees and the wagon ("C") seems just to suffer.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.




Last edited by California98Civic; 06-12-2013 at 08:23 PM.. Reason: three intrusive typos (shakes fist at spelling gods)
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to California98Civic For This Useful Post:
aerohead (06-12-2013)
Old 06-09-2013, 08:50 PM   #200 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,241

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,234 Times in 1,724 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
Maybe. Let's see: Cx is another way of noting Cd. The "Y" axis, therefore is measuring change in Cd (Cx) +/- and the "X" axis si charting different angles for the different body shape's diffusers. Body shape A and B are shown to have their best diffuser angels at 3 or 4 degrees and the wagon ("C") seems just to suffer.
So, once again, I am doomed?

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com