Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 11-21-2011, 05:31 PM   #11 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cd View Post
I was the first to post on this question and had a list going until i re-read the question. If I understand right, the question is not how to get better FE, but whose modification has saved the most gas.

The first thing that comes to my mind is MetroMPG's alternator delete mod. , but I'm not sure if that falls outside the " non-daily drivable configuration ".
I guess i didn't understand right.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 11-21-2011, 10:29 PM   #12 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 588

Ladogaboy - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
Team Emperor
90 day: 27.64 mpg (US)

E85 EVO - '11 Mitsubishi Lancer EVO GSR
90 day: 21.38 mpg (US)
Thanks: 59
Thanked 59 Times in 47 Posts
For me, driver and then LRR tires. To be fair, I haven't done a whole lot outside of that (basic aero mods and weight reduction).
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 02:28 AM   #13 (permalink)
EcoBus Driver
 
tinduck's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Germany
Posts: 54

EcoBus - '09 VW Multivan SL TDI 103 KW
90 day: 42.1 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 4 Times in 4 Posts
Mhhh... lets see..

1) Driving technique. Ohhh yes. I was trying to save fuel before I encountered this website by upshifting early, use low rpms, go slow etc. This was OK, but hypermiling techniques (coasting, P&G) gave me another approx. 10% increase in FE.

2) Tire pressure! I go 0,3 bar below max. sidewall pressure. For me, this is the compromise between FE and uneven tire wear. Cannot give FE improvement numbers for this, though.

3) My upper grill block seems to have given me around +5 mpg (48 => 53 mpg on my morning commute), though this is not A-B-A tested, just my trip data.

so long,

tinduck
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 09:33 AM   #14 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
(duplicate)

Last edited by jime57; 11-22-2011 at 09:39 AM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 09:38 AM   #15 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Mid-Atlantic
Posts: 491

OurInsight - '06 Honda Insight
Thanks: 170
Thanked 69 Times in 44 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by tinduck View Post
Mhhh... lets see..
2) Tire pressure! I go 0,3 bar below max. sidewall pressure. For me, this is the compromise between FE and uneven tire wear. Cannot give FE improvement numbers for this, though.

3) My upper grill block seems to have given me around +5 mpg (48 => 53 mpg on my morning commute), though this is not A-B-A tested, just my trip data.

so long,

tinduck
Go directly to max sidewall. The improvement up to that level is well documented and safe within the tire manufacturer's recommendation.

Not to be too critical, but your grill block outsized improvement of about 10% is not supported by A-B-A testing of others. Testing has shown improvements of the order of 3%, give or take a bit. Such testing usually starts with a well warmed car and drive train, otherwise you are testing two effects at the same time - warmup characteristics and aerodynamics. That said, fuel improvement is fuel improvement and a quicker warmup with less wasted fuel is still a genuine savings. Good savings, and good results.

You might achieve further improvement with some smooth wheel caps and some nicely designed and finished wheel spats. They are a good start down the ecomodding road.

Good econodriving
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 11:12 AM   #16 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
kach22i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ann Arbor, Michigan
Posts: 4,179
Thanks: 127
Thanked 2,802 Times in 1,968 Posts
1. Driving technique

2. Chin spoiler (was 14" now 7" clearance, would like to go to 3" in summer)

3. Cover on the pick-up truck bed.
__________________
George
Architect, Artist and Designer of Objects

2012 Infiniti G37X Coupe
1977 Porsche 911s Targa
1998 Chevy S-10 Pick-Up truck
1989 Scat II HP Hovercraft

You cannot sell aerodynamics in a can............
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 12:13 PM   #17 (permalink)
Cyborg ECU
 
California98Civic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Coastal Southern California
Posts: 6,299

Black and Green - '98 Honda Civic DX Coupe
Team Honda
90 day: 66.42 mpg (US)

Black and Red - '00 Nashbar Custom built eBike
90 day: 3671.43 mpg (US)
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 2,172 Times in 1,469 Posts
It is a good idea to consider doing a dozen or so smaller mods generally known to help, even though their improvements are modest. Piled-up together you may see a larger improvement. But this is time-consuming. I find I generally have "temporary" versions of mods on the car as a way to get a feel for their function.

Quote:
Originally Posted by kach22i View Post
1. Driving technique

2. Chin spoiler (was 14" now 7" clearance, would like to go to 3" in summer)

3. Cover on the pick-up truck bed.
__________________
See my car's mod & maintenance thread and my electric bicycle's thread for ongoing projects. I will rebuild Black and Green over decades as parts die, until it becomes a different car of roughly the same shape and color. My minimum fuel economy goal is 55 mpg while averaging posted speed limits. I generally top 60 mpg. See also my Honda manual transmission specs thread.



  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 12:53 PM   #18 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 232 Times in 160 Posts
Actually getting your car chopped and channeled is the best aero clean up
Attached Thumbnails
Click image for larger version

Name:	chopped.JPG
Views:	47
Size:	114.8 KB
ID:	9762  
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 05:39 PM   #19 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,267
Thanks: 24,392
Thanked 7,360 Times in 4,760 Posts
most

* on the VW bus it was the boat tail
* on the CRX it was the boat tail
*on the Dodge pickup it was the aeroshell
*on the Toyota pickup it was the aeroshell
*on the Toyota,the inflated boat tail also had a good showing along with a 1/2-tonneau and a storage container
  Reply With Quote
Old 11-22-2011, 07:47 PM   #20 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fort Worth, Texas
Posts: 2,442

2004 CTD - '04 DODGE RAM 2500 SLT
Team Cummins
90 day: 19.36 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,422
Thanked 737 Times in 557 Posts
I would say tires, inflated properly. And that is from a certified weight scale and working with pressure versus load numbers; oem vehicle manufacturer and tire manufacturer numbers range. No way I can save enough fuel to offset prematurely wearing tires due to overinflation. Handling/braking issues aren't worth overinflation risks either. This takes things the wrong direction. My compromise is about plus ten percent over indicated load pressure, for now (80-psi tires). Much depends on how the truck is being used. As DISCOUNT TIRE has a nice COATES air pressure setup in their garages these days, changing pressures as much as 20-psi in the rear is quick (plus the air dryer system works).

As to genuine vehicle modifications -- and assuming adequate highway miles -- I look forward to grille blocks/winter front plus some undercarriage covers in the next year or so.

.


Last edited by slowmover; 11-22-2011 at 07:56 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com