Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-24-2016, 10:37 AM   #61 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Not bad.

I Wonder why there is no econo version of the FR-S/GT86 as it's spiritual precedessor, the ae86 had a sistermodel called AE85, which was pretty much a simplistic econobox.

__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-24-2016, 10:42 AM   #62 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Good question!

With sales of the car down a lot in the U.S., I wonder if they would ever consider a "stripped down" version, possibly with a smaller engine.

Highly unlikely is my guess. Lots of arm chair commenters (North America) already complain the engine is not powerful enough.

We're definitely in a tiny, tiny minority even thinking that one with lower hp is an interesting idea.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 10:54 AM   #63 (permalink)
Volvo-driving MachYeen
 
Fingie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Finland
Posts: 788

Neo Volvo - '98 Volvo S70 10V
90 day: 24.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 298
Thanked 82 Times in 68 Posts
Well, the AE86 wasn't exactly fast as standard either. They are fast in the corners tho

That's why there is a cute thing called aftermarket
__________________
If you don't make any mistakes in your life,
life itself will be a f*ckup.



With Volvo to Valhalla and back!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 10:56 AM   #64 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Indeed.

I am in violent agreement with you.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 11:03 AM   #65 (permalink)
Moderator
 
Vman455's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Urbana, IL
Posts: 1,939

Pope Pious the Prius - '13 Toyota Prius Two
Team Toyota
SUV
90 day: 51.62 mpg (US)

Tycho the Truck - '91 Toyota Pickup DLX 4WD
90 day: 22.22 mpg (US)
Thanks: 199
Thanked 1,805 Times in 941 Posts
I doubt it; the manufacturer response to slow sales is usually to add content (like Toyota is doing now that the FR-S is becoming the 86, redoing the front and rear fascia, adding HID lights, nicer interior materials, etc.). Same with the Mirage--they had a bunch of 2015s at the Chicago show and one 2017 and I found myself wondering what normal buyer wouldn't just wait for the 2017 if they had seen them both here.

But we're all Abby...Normal, I guess.
__________________
UIUC Aerospace Engineering
www.amateuraerodynamics.com
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 11:12 AM   #66 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,534

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 54.46 mpg (US)

Appliance car Mirage - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 57.73 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,082
Thanked 6,979 Times in 3,614 Posts
Yup.

Ironically (and sadly), hoping for the 1.0L Mirage engine option to come to North America (1.2L only here) is equally pointless as daydreaming about a de-contented, lighter, more efficient FR-S.

(Oh, and I can answer who is buying the 2015 Mirage with the restyled 2017 around the corner: people who want $3500 off MSRP! They're selling like hotcakes right now.)
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 03:29 PM   #67 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,240

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,233 Times in 1,723 Posts
I paid $1.299 at Costco February 25th. Now it is $1.789 at the same place. 44.1 lifetime MPG does not impress anyone, but I do not like paying another five dollars every week or two!
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 10:54 PM   #68 (permalink)
wdb
lurker's apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: the Perimeter
Posts: 942

PlainJane - '12 Toyota Tacoma Base 4WD Access Cab
90 day: 20.98 mpg (US)
Thanks: 504
Thanked 226 Times in 173 Posts
De-contented FRS from the manufacturer is a pipe dream. You're looking at the wrong end of the pipe. Look at the other end; lease expirations. Buy one cheap off lease and de-content to your heart's content.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-24-2016, 11:29 PM   #69 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fingie View Post
Not bad.

I Wonder why there is no econo version of the FR-S/GT86 as it's spiritual precedessor, the ae86 had a sistermodel called AE85, which was pretty much a simplistic econobox.
Because it's a Subaru, and the only other engine in the Subaru lineup is the FB20, which would have to be reworked for a longitudinal setup with the Aisin transmission. As is, the FR-S is already very cheap and very fuel efficient (as I've shown, the main weakness is the poor low speed efficiency and weight, which makes it only average in city conditions), so there's no reason to downgrade it further.

In Japan they do sell a more barebones version with a 3.7 final drive no LSD, 16" wheels. That thing probably gets Prius fuel economy on the freeway. If you really want I think it's the same diff that the IS300 came with, but I've come to appreciate the torsen LSD a lot, and besides the car does struggle a little at low rpm. The engine would need a retune to cruise efficiently with the taller gears too.

Either way, at 30 dollars a fillup (that's with 91 here in California) which I've done like 4 times in the last half year, fuel cost is not on my mind at all, because this car is just too efficient and I realized what I pay to park the car in San Francisco is what it costs to maintain a Porsche 911 or Aston Martin or Maserati or something like that. Hell, 2 hours at the parking meter anywhere in SF is 2-3 gallons of fuel.

Kind of makes me want to grab a gas guzzler like an old-ish 911 or V8 M3 or some other horrendously thirsty European V8 and ecomod that. It would be way more fun to ecomod because turning a 15-20mpg car into a 20-25mpg car saves a ton of money, and those cars burn through their gas tanks fast enough that stopping for gas gets annoying. A narrowband emulator for lean burn would be worth it in that case, and tuning would be so much fun The thirstiest cars I've seen around here are some of the trucks/SUVs, Crown Vics, and V8 Mustangs, but the V8 Mustangs have a pretty tall cruising gear, whereas old European cars will run their V8s at 2700rpm without cylinder deactivation on the freeway and get <20 mpg. You could try crazy things like forcing open loop and deactivating injectors for DIY cylinder deactivation (although maybe not a good idea on a more expensive motor).

As far as a decontented Toyota goes, the S-FR concept is going to make it to production with a 1.5L 2NR-FKE engine which should be extremely fuel efficient, since it has the new piston coatings, cooled EGR, wide angle VVT, pulling a 1 ton car. However since it's a shorter car (length) at the same height the aero is going to be worse. With some mods I bet that car can average 45 or even 50 mpg, because similar weight MR2 Spyders with less efficient engines could average high 30s with a 6 speed transmission in the hands of an efficient driver. I'd like to see one of the more skilled hypermilers here get one of them If I didn't have such a strong preference for mid-engined sports cars, I'd buy one because the pint sized <1 ton cars are so much fun to drive, but I'll be waiting for the next Lotus Elise or the rumored Honda "baby NSX", assuming they ever make it to production.

Last edited by serialk11r; 03-25-2016 at 12:30 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
AntiochOG (10-30-2016)
Old 05-18-2016, 03:02 AM   #70 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
The other day I decided to reset the trip meter to see how many mpg I could get with the most aggressive engine off P&G possible. I was doing a bit over 60mph average on the freeway so this wasn't really shooting for maximum fuel economy. However I was accelerating at the maximum load possible where the engine doesn't run rich, so it was essentially near minimum BSFC the whole way.

The meter recorded a bit over 16 miles for a 34.3 mile trip. I think in reality it's fair to call it 16.0 miles since the car considers rolling with the engine off but key on as 0 mpg when it's really infinite mpg. We'll call it 2.1x the displayed mpg.

Displayed mpg was...23.7. 23.7*2.1=49.8

Computer is probably optimistic, but hey, it's a lot better than 37, and the trip only took 5 minutes more than usual when cruising at 65-70.

Coming back, I forgot the numbers but remembered calculating it to be something like 48mpg in my head.


Last edited by serialk11r; 05-18-2016 at 03:08 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to serialk11r For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (05-18-2016)
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com