Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-20-2011, 10:58 PM   #91 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Frank,

Refer back to post #66.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-20-2011, 11:05 PM   #92 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock View Post
This is well said as both handling and ride are affected by over-inflation.

More than a decade ago I bought an 89 Celica convertible from a private seller. I test drove the car and loved it but I thought it handled a bit oddly. My mechanic inspected it before I bought it and found everything to be OK. But at highway speeds the handling was spooky: uncomfortably unpredictable. Driving it just didn't feel right. After owning it for a day or two I checked the tires and found the tire pressures were close to 50 PSI. I reduced the pressure to about 38 and what a difference it made! It handled just great. I enjoyed the car for 16 years and recently sold it, with it still going strong.

So no, higher pressure is not always better, and it might even be unsafe. And yes, the much harsher ride that comes with over-inflated tires might not make you a happy camper, either.
I've run 50 psi for some time in my F150 and it handles the same as it does with lower pressures, aside from the added bump harshness. I've also run it on other vehicles too and have noted the same thing- handling OK but harshness increased.

Feel free to run your stuff at down to 35 then- I won't badmouth you for that.

Re: 30 mph: On my bicycle and Songi, yes. Others, up to 60 normally, with occasional blasts to 130 mph... or more.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 06:12 AM   #93 (permalink)
Tire Geek
 
CapriRacer's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Let's just say I'm in the US
Posts: 796
Thanks: 4
Thanked 393 Times in 240 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by SentraSE-R View Post
..........While some people think higher inflation pressures increase a tire's risk of failure, there has been no statistical proof presented to support this theory......


I think this addresses your concern.

This is from SAE paper 800087 - The Effect of Inflation Pressure on Bias, Bias-Belted, and Radial Tire Performance - by B. L. Collier and J. T. Warchol, B. F. Goodrich, February, 1980. That image shows the affect inflation pressure has on impact resistance of the 3 types of tires tested. They were all the same: There is about a 30% loss in impact resistance with raising the tire pressure from32 psi to 48 psi.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to CapriRacer For This Useful Post:
SentraSE-R (05-21-2011)
Old 05-21-2011, 06:19 AM   #94 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
If I see a 3-5" nub in the road I'll definitely try to avoid it!

Luckily over the last 40 years I don't recall ever encountering one...

Zowie! I want some pants like that!
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 10:53 AM   #95 (permalink)
Pishtaco
 
SentraSE-R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Bay Area, California
Posts: 1,485

Mean Green Toaster Machine - '06 Scion xB
Team Toyota
90 day: 48.92 mpg (US)
Thanks: 56
Thanked 286 Times in 181 Posts
+1, CapriRacer.
__________________
Darrell

Boycotting Exxon since 1989, BP since 2010
Have you ever noticed that anybody driving slower than you is an idiot, and anyone going faster than you is a maniac? George Carlin
Mean Green Toaster Machine
49.5 mpg avg over 53,000 miles. 176% of '08 EPA
Best flat drive 94.5 mpg for 10.1 mi
Longest tank 1033 km (642 mi) on 10.56 gal = 60.8 mpg
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 12:08 PM   #96 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
I

Feel free to run your stuff at down to 35 then- I won't badmouth you for that.
My point is that if over-inflating your tires causes your car to handle erratically, that is a safety issue.

Increasing the risk of an accident in trying to save fuel is penny wise, pound foolish. (No pun intended.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 01:17 PM   #97 (permalink)
Rat Racer
 
Fat Charlie's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Route 16
Posts: 4,150

Al the Third, year four - '13 Honda Fit Base
Team Honda
90 day: 42.9 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,784
Thanked 1,922 Times in 1,246 Posts
UFO- I wasn't actually saying that going to the sidewall pressire was "overinflating." Sorry if I made it look like that. I was addressing SentraSE-R's statement that "There's simply no relationship or cause/effect rationale possible." That surprised me enough that it completely bumped from my mind the fact that two posts earlier he said "inflation to sidewall maximum is not overinflation." So that's a sorry to both of you. It turns out that I was agreeing with SentraSE-R even though I thought I wasn't. My point about pressure affecting tire life was referring to tires above sidewall pressure. I singled that out because it's the only environmental parameter that's preset (and the thread topic)- everything else is just driving conditions.

I don't even approach max sidewall with my 215/45/17s because with New England frost heaves being the way they are it'll mean blowouts and failed steering/suspension parts. I sell too many tie rod ends and control arm bushings to people with tall tires at factory pressure settings- I have low tires with and don't feel like damaging my car. My car wants 35F 33R and the sidewall is 44. I'm at 40 all around and don't plan on going higher because I just don't have enough sidewall height to make me feel safe at max sidewall, much less over it.
__________________

Quote:
Originally Posted by sheepdog44 View Post
Transmission type Efficiency
Manual neutral engine off.100% @MPG <----- Fun Fact.
Manual 1:1 gear ratio .......98%
CVT belt ............................88%
Automatic .........................86%

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-21-2011, 06:39 PM   #98 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Thymeclock View Post
My point is that if over-inflating your tires causes your car to handle erratically, that is a safety issue.

Increasing the risk of an accident in trying to save fuel is penny wise, pound foolish. (No pun intended.)
Well maybe at 50 psi they AREN'T overinflated. It's a YMMV thing.

If I ever get a clapped-out old Toyota, though, I'll keep this in mind.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 01:53 PM   #99 (permalink)
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: NY
Posts: 865
Thanks: 29
Thanked 111 Times in 83 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Well maybe at 50 psi they AREN'T overinflated. It's a YMMV thing.

If I ever get a clapped-out old Toyota, though, I'll keep this in mind.
I looked in the glossary but couldn't find "YMMV".

You are good at using vague acronyms and making derogatory comments.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2011, 02:14 PM   #100 (permalink)
...beats walking...
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: .
Posts: 6,190
Thanks: 179
Thanked 1,525 Times in 1,126 Posts
Your Milage May Vary = (colloquially) your opinion may be different.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com