Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 10-07-2021, 07:35 PM   #11 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,465

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
I still wonder why the diesel Humvee only gets 8 MPG and is equipped with a 150-190 HP engine?

I could forget to take the parking brake off my diesel truck which weighs just about the same and has about the same size engine and still get better fuel economy.

Anyhow, there's several threads on the Chevy Bolt forum complaining of how wasteful the new EV Hummer is. Now to figure out how to roll electrons...

__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 10-07-2021, 10:31 PM   #12 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Roughly 40 years of technical development for Diesel engines playin their role. IIRC the Humvee is still fitted with a slightly modernized version of the Detroit Diesel 6.5L V8 rebranded Optimizer 6500, with the 3.4L Steyr M16 available as option.
Armored Humvees are so slow because they were never intended to be armored vehicles. The military added 7,000 pounds of armor to a 6,000 lb vehicle with a 190 HP diesel paired to a 4 speed automatic.

Yes, newer tech helps but so does matching engine output to the vehicle weight.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-07-2021, 10:36 PM   #13 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
I still wonder why the diesel Humvee only gets 8 MPG and is equipped with a 150-190 HP engine?

I could forget to take the parking brake off my diesel truck which weighs just about the same and has about the same size engine and still get better fuel economy.

Anyhow, there's several threads on the Chevy Bolt forum complaining of how wasteful the new EV Hummer is. Now to figure out how to roll electrons...

Likely a combination of 37 inch tires, low gearing, full time 4WD, portal hubs, and aerodynamics of a brick.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 12:51 AM   #14 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
The military added 7,000 pounds of armor to a 6,000 lb vehicle with a 190 HP diesel paired to a 4 speed automatic.
Of course. Yet some modern 4-cyl turbodiesels below 5-litre outperform that old-school V8 fitted to the Humvee, even though they would naturally not have a performance much comparable to the Oshkosh JLTV with its Duramax-based powerplant.


Quote:
Yes, newer tech helps but so does matching engine output to the vehicle weight.
Reminds me a talk I recently had with a taxi driver, regarding underpowered engines that we would often see in Brazilian vehicles as a desperate (and most often failed) attempt to increase fuel savings.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 01:17 AM   #15 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
Of course. Yet some modern 4-cyl turbodiesels below 5-litre outperform that old-school V8 fitted to the Humvee, even though they would naturally not have a performance much comparable to the Oshkosh JLTV with its Duramax-based powerplant.
No doubt that 6.5L has a very low state of tune - it doesn't even have a turbo. The surprising thing is that is was an upgrade from the earlier 6.2L 165 hp V8 mated to a 3 speed automatic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 05:24 PM   #16 (permalink)
It's all about Diesel
 
cRiPpLe_rOoStEr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil
Posts: 12,571
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1,627 Times in 1,452 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by JSH View Post
No doubt that 6.5L has a very low state of tune - it doesn't even have a turbo.
AFAIK the 195hp version fitted to the Humvee in the mid-'90s (and to earliest versions of the Hummer for the civilian market) is already turbocharged, yet its torque ratings are often pointed out as pathetic compared to a 6-cyl Cummins or the International engines fitted to the Ford F-Series around the same time.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 06:10 PM   #17 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by cRiPpLe_rOoStEr View Post
AFAIK the 195hp version fitted to the Humvee in the mid-'90s (and to earliest versions of the Hummer for the civilian market) is already turbocharged, yet its torque ratings are often pointed out as pathetic compared to a 6-cyl Cummins or the International engines fitted to the Ford F-Series around the same time.
You recall correctly. The Detroit Diesel engines were:

6.2L NA
6.5L NA
6.5L Turbo
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2021, 06:36 PM   #18 (permalink)
Human Environmentalist
 
redpoint5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 12,465

Acura TSX - '06 Acura TSX
90 day: 24.19 mpg (US)

Lafawnda - CBR600 - '01 Honda CBR600 F4i
90 day: 47.32 mpg (US)

Big Yeller - Dodge/Cummins - '98 Dodge Ram 2500 base
90 day: 21.82 mpg (US)

Mazda CX-5 - '17 Mazda CX-5 Touring
90 day: 26.68 mpg (US)

Chevy ZR-2 - '03 Chevrolet S10 ZR2
90 day: 17.14 mpg (US)

Model Y - '24 Tesla Y LR AWD
Thanks: 4,212
Thanked 4,390 Times in 3,364 Posts
Yeah, my 5.9L ISB 6-cylinder diesel from 1998 puts out 235 horsepower.

Not impressed with a larger engine with more cylinders putting out much less power.
__________________
Gas and Electric Vehicle Cost of Ownership Calculator







Give me absolute safety, or give me death!
  Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2021, 12:17 AM   #19 (permalink)
JSH
AKA - Jason
 
JSH's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: PDX
Posts: 3,501

Adventure Seeker - '04 Chevy Astro - Campervan
90 day: 17.3 mpg (US)
Thanks: 309
Thanked 2,067 Times in 1,397 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by redpoint5 View Post
Yeah, my 5.9L ISB 6-cylinder diesel from 1998 puts out 235 horsepower.

Not impressed with a larger engine with more cylinders putting out much less power.
The Humvee got a 6.5L turbo in 1994. 190 hp / 380 lb-ft was a decent spec at the time. The 1994 5.9L Cummins made 160 hp / 400 lb-ft.

AM General engines
https://www.amgeneral.com/what-we-do...ve-components/

Cummins engines.
Cummins Horsepower & Torque by Model Year
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to JSH For This Useful Post:
redpoint5 (10-09-2021)
Old 10-10-2021, 01:59 PM   #20 (permalink)
Eco-ventor
 
jakobnev's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: sweden
Posts: 1,631

Princess - '92 Mazda MX-3 GS
House of Tudor
Team Mazda
90 day: 53.54 mpg (US)

Shirubāarō (*´ω`*) - '05 Toyota Prius Executive
Team Toyota
90 day: 54.88 mpg (US)

Blue Thunder - '20 Hyundai IONIQ Trend PHEV
Team Hyundai
Plug-in Hybrids
90 day: 587.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 74
Thanked 702 Times in 445 Posts
Send a message via MSN to jakobnev
Quote:
Now to figure out how to roll electrons...
A Tesla-coil exhaust maybe?

__________________




2016: 128.75L for 1875.00km => 6.87L/100km (34.3MPG US)
2017: 209.14L for 4244.00km => 4.93L/100km (47.7MPG US)
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com