Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 05-26-2014, 01:03 AM   #11 (permalink)
herp derp Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Lawrence, KS
Posts: 1,049

Saturn-sold - '99 saturn sc1
Team Saturn
90 day: 28.28 mpg (US)

Yukon - '03 GMC Yukon Denali
90 day: 13.74 mpg (US)
Thanks: 43
Thanked 331 Times in 233 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
Sure threw in the towel fast. Couldn't a shorter belt be run on the topside of the tensioner pulley?
Doesn't look like the tensioner would have a very good angle on the belt to do its job. The grooved side of the belt would be running on a smooth pulley too, unless both sides are grooved.

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 05-26-2014, 01:18 AM   #12 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
I'm confused, I'm willing to give it a try if there is no risk in damaging the car. Just explain what I need to do exactly, I'm not the best at doing work like this but, I am willing to learn.

Also, for me personally, even a 0.5mpg increase would be worth it.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 01:34 AM   #13 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc View Post
Doesn't look like the tensioner would have a very good angle on the belt to do its job. The grooved side of the belt would be running on a smooth pulley too, unless both sides are grooved.
There are options. If the angle proves feasible for the belt run but not for the tensioner to maintain tension, perhaps the tensioner could be fixed to position and tension set manually.

If running the ribs on a smooth pulley causes a problem, perhaps a grooved pulley could be mounted without too much difficulty.

Nice thing is, it appears the power steering system could be left completely intact if for some reason wolf wants it hooked up again.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 02:24 AM   #14 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Frank Lee View Post
There are options. If the angle proves feasible for the belt run but not for the tensioner to maintain tension, perhaps the tensioner could be fixed to position and tension set manually.

If running the ribs on a smooth pulley causes a problem, perhaps a grooved pulley could be mounted without too much difficulty.

Nice thing is, it appears the power steering system could be left completely intact if for some reason wolf wants it hooked up again.
I plan on buying a new car (gonna try to find a Toyota Echo with around 50k miles for like 8k or so) when I get the settlement from my car accident, so I will be hooking it back up again to either trade it in or privately sell it.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 03:15 AM   #15 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,225

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,253
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
I'm confused, I'm willing to give it a try if there is no risk in damaging the car. Just explain what I need to do exactly, I'm not the best at doing work like this but, I am willing to learn.

Also, for me personally, even a 0.5mpg increase would be worth it.
From 39.69 to 40.19 MPG, with the cheapest gas in Apple Valley, California being $3.96, you would go from 9.977 to 9.853 cents per mile, and if the modification costs $50, the break-even point should be:

$50 = $3.96 * (0.09977 - 0.09853) * miles = 0.0049104 * miles
miles = $50 / 0.0049104 = 10,182.47 miles

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
I plan on buying a new car (gonna try to find a Toyota Echo with around 50k miles for like 8k or so) when I get the settlement from my car accident, so I will be hooking it back up again to either trade it in or privately sell it.
Oh, so you do not plan on driving it 10,182.5 miles?

I am glad that we could have this talk.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Xist For This Useful Post:
2000mc (05-26-2014)
Old 05-26-2014, 03:12 PM   #16 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xist View Post
From 39.69 to 40.19 MPG, with the cheapest gas in Apple Valley, California being $3.96, you would go from 9.977 to 9.853 cents per mile, and if the modification costs $50, the break-even point should be:

$50 = $3.96 * (0.09977 - 0.09853) * miles = 0.0049104 * miles
miles = $50 / 0.0049104 = 10,182.47 miles



Oh, so you do not plan on driving it 10,182.5 miles?

I am glad that we could have this talk.
I pay 4.15. Cheapest around me is 3.99. Also yea, I will probably be putting that many miles on it. I have only had the car for a week and a half and I have already put 1.5k miles on it.

[Edit]: Probably won't have the money for another 3-4 months. So I will probably rack around 20k miles before then, maybe 15k.
__________________


Last edited by Baltothewolf; 05-26-2014 at 03:34 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 10:46 PM   #17 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Also, does anyone know a ball-park figure of gains from pizza pan wheel covers? This is a mod I really want to do and would like to know what kind of gains I would see from it.
__________________

  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 11:08 PM   #18 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Personal opinion, might not be representative of the truth:
Drivetrain side mods on most cars get you way more mpg than reducing the amount of energy it takes to move the car around. The PS delete will show noticable improvement whereas aero will be harder to detect. Of course with something really easy and basically free like a grill block go ahead.

Also don't even bother with 50 bucks for a new one, like I said go on Spyderchat or Lotustalk or something and find someone who blew their motor. ZZ motors have oiling problems and a lot of them die from oil starvation (2ZZ mainly), and heavy oil consumption from stuck rings (1ZZ mainly) which leads to oil starvation. Someone on Spyderchat is parting out a car with bent valves right now, doesn't hurt to ask for the idler pulley. I can't imagine they'd want more than 30 bucks for it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 11:11 PM   #19 (permalink)
Furry Furfag
 
Baltothewolf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 2,084

Winsight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Miaderp - '95 Mazda Miata
90 day: 28.53 mpg (US)
Thanks: 67
Thanked 409 Times in 313 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by serialk11r View Post
Personal opinion, might not be representative of the truth:
Drivetrain side mods on most cars get you way more mpg than reducing the amount of energy it takes to move the car around. The PS delete will show noticable improvement whereas aero will be harder to detect. Of course with something really easy and basically free like a grill block go ahead.

Also don't even bother with 50 bucks for a new one, like I said go on Spyderchat or Lotustalk or something and find someone who blew their motor. ZZ motors have oiling problems and a lot of them die from oil starvation (2ZZ mainly), and heavy oil consumption from stuck rings (1ZZ mainly) which leads to oil starvation. Someone on Spyderchat is parting out a car with bent valves right now, doesn't hurt to ask for the idler pulley. I can't imagine they'd want more than 30 bucks for it.
Where would I mount it on the Corolla even if I did get it?

Oh also, I will be doing a grill block very soon. Especially since I have my UG and can watch engine temps more closely now.
__________________


Last edited by Baltothewolf; 05-26-2014 at 11:23 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Old 05-26-2014, 11:22 PM   #20 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: United States
Posts: 1,756

spyder2 - '00 Toyota MR2 Spyder
Thanks: 104
Thanked 407 Times in 312 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Baltothewolf View Post
Where would I mount it on the Corolla even if I did get it?
Wait, I mean this in the most respectful possible way, but do you even read the replies to your posts in your own thread? It puts an idler pulley where the PS used to be, you unbolt the PS pump, put the idler on, and then put the stock belt on.

Quote:
Originally Posted by 2000mc View Post

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com