The Pacific Ocean is being trashed....

[suspectnumber961]

I highly recommend these videos if you eat food....



Fukushima and Radioactivity in Seafood | NutritionFacts.org

[suspectnumber961]

Fukushima Update: The Nuclear Disaster That Won't Go Away | Care2 Causes


Seafood Industry Threatened

Toward the end of last year, U.S. scientists and wildlife specialists officially became worried about Fukushima’s impact on the fishing industry. As I’ve mentioned before, it’s all one big ocean. If a massive amount of contamination is dumped into the ocean on one side of the world, rest assured it will eventually make it’s way to the other. We saw this with physical rubble from the Japanese earthquake and tsunami, and the same currents are bringing the invisible contaminants as well. Fish, especially salmon, must migrate through the radioactive plumes coming off Fukushima before being harvested on North American coasts. Some believe this represents an eventual health crisis, and that it’s no longer safe to eat fish from the Pacific Ocean

[Arragonis]

Scaremongering nonsense. We have examples of Nuclear "disasters" the biggest is obviously Chernobyl :



From Here.

Radiation exists in the environment naturally. Radon Gas for example seeps up into people's houses in some parts of the UK and elsewhere. People living in those houses would be far more likely to die from crossing the road than due to radiation poisoning.

In fact you will get more radiation poisoning from Bananas :

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4zJn4gxCx3c

Americans eating fish from the Pacific are more likely to die from overeating and obesity than radiation from the fish. And Nuclear power is the safest power we have available, and reduces GHGs if thats your bag.

[NeilBlanchard]

Originally Posted by Arragonis

No it can't.

Why not?

Scotland is planning on 100% renewable by 2020 or so. Germany is well ahead of schedule. Your claim of new coal plants there is not credible.

[jamesqf]

Originally Posted by Giovanni LiCalsi

Read what Ralph Nader is saying:

Why? The man built his career on lies, why think he'd tell the truth, except by accident.

Nader is about as objective on nuclear power as the Westboro Baptist Church is on gay marriage.

[jamesqf]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Germany is well ahead of schedule. Your claim of new coal plants there is not credible.

Strange, then, that the media is full of reports like this: Merkel Facing Power Dilemma as Coal Plants Open: Energy Markets - Bloomberg Deny all you want, but it's pretty hard to hide a coal plant.

[P-hack]

Get your checkbook out and make it happen then Neil.

[Giovanni LiCalsi]

Nuclear power plants are safe?
Fukushima is a great example how safe the are?

[Arragonis]

Originally Posted by NeilBlanchard

Germany is well ahead of schedule. Your claim of new coal plants there is not credible.

Researchers Alarmed at Rise in German Brown Coal Power Output - SPIEGEL ONLINE

ANALYSIS: German 4 GW new coal plants in testing after first fire - Coal | Platts News Article & Story

Germany -- Insane Or Just Plain Stupid? - Forbes

Even Wikipedia...

The recent plan to build 26 new coal plants[8] is controversial in light of Germany's commitment to curbing emissions

The dirty coal behind Germany's clean energy - CSMonitor.com

It get's worse. Germany is not only building new coal plants, but they use lignite, a soft brown coal halfway between coal and peat with an even higher CO2 and ash content than hard coal.

And even Spain is cutting back - and its very sunny there:

http://www.nytimes.com/2013/12/28/bu...city.html?_r=0

[Arragonis]

Originally Posted by Giovanni LiCalsi

Nuclear power plants are safe?
Fukushima is a great example how safe the are?

Nobody died from the Fukushima nuclear accident.

Nobody.

Zero.

None.

An integer less than one.

This number -> 0.

No more than that.