Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > General Efficiency Discussion
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-10-2015, 08:51 PM   #1 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
ShinyMew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Vic, AU
Posts: 27

Suzuki Swift '06 - '06 Suzuki Swift (Base)
Thanks: 4
Thanked 3 Times in 1 Post
Lightbulb The [part of the] road less travelled: car economy gains by ridge-riding in the dry?

As the title implies, is there anyone who has noticed a non-negligible improvement in fuel economy by driving on the unused portion of lane tarmac (typically on the inside half of the lane) when operating a car in dry conditions?

On one hand, logic may dictate that the used portion of a road lane (typically the centre of the lane) would be rendered smoother by the constant traffic which uses it. It is easily noticeable by often being darker and slightly lower than the unused portion on the inside which appears more glossy and new. On the other hand, I have noticed that the unused portion actually feels smoother, and is less prone to potholes.

I am not sure if this different experience is simply due to wishful-thinking induced by driving on fresher-appearing tarmac, however.

Summary version: I've only heard of ridge-riding really working when water forms in ridges of roads in poor condition. Does ridge-riding really work in the dry?

__________________
Proponent for Prevention of Cruelty to Automobiles.


Last edited by ShinyMew; 03-13-2015 at 11:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-10-2015, 09:05 PM   #2 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
The ridge is good for avoiding potholes. It would be nice to not trash the tires and shocks.

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2015, 10:04 PM   #3 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
I crowd centerline on roads with deep truck trenches because it's much smoother out of the trench.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 08:16 AM   #4 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
Yes! wishful thinking and/or pothole avoidance!
__________________




  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 10:02 AM   #5 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
According to Cummins, the difference in CRR between smooth polished concrete and chip and seal blacktop is 45%. As a rule of thumb if you can hear your tyres roaring against the road surface, your MPG is suffering.

Stick to where it's polished smooth
__________________







Last edited by oldtamiyaphile; 03-11-2015 at 10:20 AM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to oldtamiyaphile For This Useful Post:
Cd (03-11-2015)
Old 03-11-2015, 11:30 AM   #6 (permalink)
Just cruisin’ along
 
jcp123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 1,183

Beater Echo - '00 Toyota Echo
90 day: 42.67 mpg (US)

Hondizzle - '97 Honda Civic DX
Team Honda
90 day: 46.55 mpg (US)

Shaggin Waggin - '14 Chrysler Town + Country
90 day: 22.56 mpg (US)
Thanks: 66
Thanked 200 Times in 170 Posts
On the chip seal we have so much of here, the ridge is the worst. In the grooves, a lot of the pebbles are mostly cleared and I tend to do better.
__________________



'97 Honda Civic DX Coupe 5MT - dead 2/23
'00 Echo - dead 2/17
'14 Chrysler Town + Country - My DD, for now
'67 Mustang Convertible - gone 1/17
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 11:36 AM   #7 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Silly-Con Valley
Posts: 1,479
Thanks: 201
Thanked 262 Times in 199 Posts
Especially in areas where they allow studded tires, there is much less road noise (and I believe better FE) by driving out of the "normal" position in the lane. For me in OR, that meant two wheels on or around the edge stripe of the road, and two near the center of the lane. Studs seem to chew up concrete or asphalt really badly...

I've noticed similar phenomena on a few roads here in the SF Bay Area of CA, where studded tires are not used. But it's much less common--and the edge of the road often has other debris on it (even just gravel) that can lead to extra noise and extra resistance.

-soD
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 12:13 PM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Studs illegal in Va, COME SLIDE WITH US LOL. It does help the roads but the asphalt parts are really trashed.

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 02:11 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Earth
Posts: 5,209
Thanks: 225
Thanked 811 Times in 594 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by oldtamiyaphile View Post
According to Cummins, the difference in CRR between smooth polished concrete and chip and seal blacktop is 45%. As a rule of thumb if you can hear your tyres roaring against the road surface, your MPG is suffering.

Stick to where it's polished smooth
Except that traffic generally does not polish the surface, but roughens it. Especially with concrete, as the cement is worn away, exposing the rougher aggregate.

With the Insight's instant mpg gauge, I can definitely see a difference between the ridges & ruts, and between different road surfaces.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2015, 08:14 PM   #10 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
I don't know about 'generally', but fresh concrete will be polished smooth until the aggregate starts to break through. We don't have any concrete roads so I don't know how long that takes.

For asphalt, that tends to melt/ soften in the summer sun, the grooves take on a distinctive shiny/ polished look, they're definitely smoother, but there comes a point where they start to 'buckle', pot holes appear and are filled in etc. If you're suspension has to do more work, that's lost energy too.

A lot of it will come down to the age and maintenance of the road in question.

__________________






  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Tags
dry weather, inside lane, outside lane, ridge-riding, side of the road

Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com