Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 09-18-2010, 12:45 PM   #21 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
AeroModder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Oregon
Posts: 471

Tank - '96 Ford Aspire 4 door
Team Ford
90 day: 46.75 mpg (US)
Thanks: 15
Thanked 65 Times in 48 Posts
When I taped up the holes in my wheels, I just removed the dust covers from the front discs. Then again, I haven't done any mountain driving since I did.

__________________
In Reason we Trust
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 09-20-2010, 06:45 PM   #22 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Brake fading due to overheating is a very real problem and is well documented. F1 cars recently started using Carbon Carbon brake rotors which don't require as much cooling. Unless you have tens of thousands of dollars to spend on a custom set for your street car your not going to get a set. Its pretty much the same story for semi trucks.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2010, 07:14 PM   #23 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
They do fade if over heated, but If you drive right they need not be used much. How many times are trucks in stop and go traffic (that they use brakes not just engine break)?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-20-2010, 10:50 PM   #24 (permalink)
DieselMiser
 
ConnClark's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Richland,WA
Posts: 985

Das Schlepper Frog - '85 Mercedes Benz 300SD
90 day: 23.23 mpg (US)

Gentoo320 - '04 Mercedes C320 4Matic
90 day: 22.44 mpg (US)
Thanks: 46
Thanked 231 Times in 160 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
They do fade if over heated, but If you drive right they need not be used much. How many times are trucks in stop and go traffic (that they use brakes not just engine break)?
ummmmmm stop and go traffic isn't the problem. Its decent down long steep hills. That is why they have run away truck ramps. Even with these run away truck ramps its not always possible for a truck to use these ramps due to traffic and carnage ensues.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2010, 09:23 AM   #25 (permalink)
Wiki Mod
 
Weather Spotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Midland MI, USA
Posts: 2,042

Max - '14 Ford C-Max SEL
Thanks: 228
Thanked 304 Times in 210 Posts
Good point about the hills, I would think that over 95% of the time the trucks are not in the hills and the better aero is the best choice. When in the hills, take them off.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2010, 11:30 AM   #26 (permalink)
A madman
 
brucey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: WV
Posts: 1,018

Pequod - '17 Subaru Outback
90 day: 22.79 mpg (US)
Thanks: 73
Thanked 183 Times in 98 Posts
Send a message via AIM to brucey
I was about to say that cars can get away with the covered wheels, even when towing in mountains. I've never had brake fade on mine.

Then I realized there is a 7% grade for 13 miles about 45 miles away I drive regularly. Everyday the weigh station wasn't open it was almost guaranteed a truck would have the brakes on fire by the bottom of the hill. You could always smell it way before you could see the smoke coming from the thing. Luckily there were never any accidents as there is a reverse incline right before the bottom.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2010, 02:07 PM   #27 (permalink)
(:
 
Frank Lee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: up north
Posts: 12,762

Blue - '93 Ford Tempo
Last 3: 27.29 mpg (US)

F150 - '94 Ford F150 XLT 4x4
90 day: 18.5 mpg (US)

Sport Coupe - '92 Ford Tempo GL
Last 3: 69.62 mpg (US)

ShWing! - '82 honda gold wing Interstate
90 day: 33.65 mpg (US)

Moon Unit - '98 Mercury Sable LX Wagon
90 day: 21.24 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,585
Thanked 3,555 Times in 2,218 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Weather Spotter View Post
Good point about the hills, I would think that over 95% of the time the trucks are not in the hills and the better aero is the best choice. When in the hills, take them off.
Cross country trucks have lots of hills to contend with. I know, it is harder for the flatland native to consider.

I don't see truckers climbing in and out to R&R hubcaps.
__________________


  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Frank Lee For This Useful Post:
spacer (10-13-2011)
Old 09-21-2010, 02:24 PM   #28 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 568
Thanks: 1
Thanked 73 Times in 58 Posts
Good points, all.

Maybe have lightweight removable covers for use on cross country trips, lower speeds and more frequent braking around town compromising the need for such covers except on the open highway.

And, maybe duct some of the undercar air that would othewise drag on the front wheels directly to the brakes, so wheels are faired and brakes stay cooler.
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-21-2010, 10:05 PM   #29 (permalink)
Cd
Ultimate Fail
 
Cd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Austin,Texas
Posts: 3,585
Thanks: 2,872
Thanked 1,121 Times in 679 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patrick View Post
The wheels on the drive axles are dished in so it's easy to put a cover on. The wheels on the front (steering) axles are dished out so it's a lot harder to put a cover on. It could still be done, but would stick out quite a bit.
( Actually I meant the rear set on the trailer. I can understand if they don't own the trailer, and just swap out trailers, but this company actually owns the trailers, yet they don't cover the rear set - just the rear set on the rig.)
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-22-2010, 10:54 AM   #30 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Phantom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Independence, KY
Posts: 603

Blue Meanie - '02 Volkswagon Golf TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 48.52 mpg (US)

Wife's car - '05 WV Passat TDI

Rudy - '94 Chevy C2500
Thanks: 89
Thanked 47 Times in 44 Posts
It would make it more complicated but they could add a pneumatic arm for the attachment point and a temp sensor on/by the brakes. When the temp hits X the pneumatic arm pops out leaving a gap, if the under side is designed correctly it could actually direct air into the wheels to cool and create some extra drag.

They would then stay open for a preset time after the temp drops.

__________________
I move at the speed of awesome.


"It's not rocket surgery!" -MetroMPG
  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread




Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
MPGuino release one workspace dcb OpenGauge / MPGuino FE computer 1061 01-17-2020 01:37 AM
Experiment: smooth wheel discs tested A-B-A - 4.6% mpg improvement @ 65 mph Concrete Aerodynamics 318 01-19-2015 11:37 AM
How long should a driving loop be for A-B-A testing? Zyzzyx General Efficiency Discussion 3 06-09-2010 03:24 PM
Larger tires and pizza pans? hat_man EcoModding Central 0 06-06-2010 06:36 PM
FS: 2007 Surly Long Haul Trucker AndrewJ For Sale 5 12-21-2007 05:34 PM



Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com