Go Back   EcoModder Forum > Off-Topic > The Lounge
Register Now
 Register Now
 


View Poll Results: Nuclear plant in YOUR town
Support it 30 58.82%
Oppose it 16 31.37%
Don't Care 5 9.80%
Voters: 51. You may not vote on this poll

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 03-28-2011, 01:10 PM   #1 (permalink)
NES Collector
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Millbury, MA
Posts: 94

Tom Baker - '03 Toyota Echo
90 day: 44.53 mpg (US)

Big Blue - '03 Dodge Caravan 2WD
90 day: 20.85 mpg (US)
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Poll - Nuclear plant in your town

Pretty simple poll. Given whats going on with japan, I was wondering if people's opinion on nuclear power has changed. So if the government came to your town and wanted to put in a nuclear plant in your town would you support it, oppose it, or don't care.

__________________
"Would you like a jelly baby"



Miles Displaced By
Walking = 3.6

Last edited by echomodder; 03-28-2011 at 01:51 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 03-28-2011, 01:18 PM   #2 (permalink)
UFO
Master EcoModder
 
UFO's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300

Colorado - '17 Chevrolet Colorado 4x4 LT
90 day: 23.07 mpg (US)
Thanks: 315
Thanked 178 Times in 138 Posts
No way. And I had the same opinion before the failure in Japan.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 01:25 PM   #3 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
euromodder's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683

The SCUD - '15 Fiat Scudo L2
Thanks: 178
Thanked 649 Times in 514 Posts
As the crow flies, I work 2.09 miles from a nuclear power plant with 4 reactors.
It hasn't really bothered me before, and it doesn't bother me now.

That doesn't mean I particularly like nuclear energy, but it'll have to do until we get something better and safer.
At the moment, we're a long shot away from that goal.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side

  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 01:32 PM   #4 (permalink)
Coasting Down the Peak
 
skyl4rk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: M I C H I G A N
Posts: 514

Toyauto Pickup - '94 Toyota Pickup 2WD
90 day: 36.32 mpg (US)

Versa Base - '09 Versa Sedan 1.6 Base
Team Nissan
90 day: 41.69 mpg (US)
Thanks: 27
Thanked 41 Times in 34 Posts
I live in a town with a reactor. I don't work there.

I feel that of all electric generation types, nuclear has the least impact on the environment.

I am concerned about operating the plant correctly, and dealing with spent fuel correctly, which I don't think is happening now.
__________________
Nissan Versa Aeromods
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to skyl4rk For This Useful Post:
tumnasgt (03-29-2011)
Old 03-28-2011, 02:01 PM   #5 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12

NorthCoaster - '96 Ford Escort LX
90 day: 39.5 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
I live a mile from a reactor and I have no problem, we have had some maitenence issues come up the last few years but it defenatly supports our community and has been a general positive.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 02:14 PM   #6 (permalink)
Hypermiler
 
PaleMelanesian's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,320

PaleCivic (retired) - '96 Honda Civic DX Sedan
90 day: 69.2 mpg (US)

PaleFit - '09 Honda Fit Sport
Team Honda
Wagons
90 day: 44.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 611
Thanked 428 Times in 280 Posts
Compared to my town's current option, one of the dirtiest coal plants in the country, nuclear sounds like a great thing to me.
__________________



11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 02:40 PM   #7 (permalink)
n00b.... sortof..
 
d0sitmatr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345

silver fire - '03 Mazda Protege5
90 day: 32.52 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
I see nuclear power as a very viable option over coal burning plants.
granted, there are even better alternatives, but they arent very viable an option yet, so until they are, nuclear is fine for me.
__________________
~Mike

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to d0sitmatr For This Useful Post:
PaleMelanesian (03-29-2011)
Old 03-28-2011, 03:06 PM   #8 (permalink)
The PRC.
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 535 Times in 384 Posts
I used to produce software used inside a power station (not as part of the station itself but as part of long term monitoring). Used to visit a number of them quite often and have no problem at all.

When it comes to the Japan incident we have to remember the plant involved is in an earthquake zone, has been around for nearly 40 years (and has therefore survived quite a few quakes in the past) and in that time has no doubt contributed far more than it cost to the Japanese economy during the 70s-2000s.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
d0sitmatr (03-29-2011)
Old 03-28-2011, 03:31 PM   #9 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Private
Posts: 282
Thanks: 2
Thanked 73 Times in 47 Posts
I think there should be more, small, community sized nuclear plants built. Something along the lines of those installed aboard submarines. Put the reactor housing below ground, and the only visible part would be the cooling tower and electrical grid.
  Reply With Quote
Old 03-28-2011, 04:29 PM   #10 (permalink)
Wannabe greenie
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098

The Clunker (retired) - '90 Honda Accord EX sedan
Team Honda
90 day: 29.49 mpg (US)

Mountain Goat - '96 Ford Ranger XLT 4x4 SuperCab
90 day: 18 mpg (US)

Zippy - '10 Kymco Agility 125
90 day: 65.03 mpg (US)
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
I answered "support" with the following caveats:

1. It needs to be a safer design than the old 50 year old designs we have now. Something self-regulating, like pebble bed.

2. We need to get the political clout together to actually create reprocessing plants. We have the technology to reprocess spent fuel over and over again until there's pretty much nothing left but a tiny bit of low-grade material that's much easier to dispose of (and much less of it!)

3. The NRC needs teeth to actually enforce safety, and Congress needs to leave them the hell alone.

Oh, and I want an RTG for my basement.

__________________

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Clev For This Useful Post:
tumnasgt (03-29-2011)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2022, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com