View Poll Results: Nuclear plant in YOUR town
|
Support it
|
|
30 |
58.82% |
Oppose it
|
|
16 |
31.37% |
Don't Care
|
|
5 |
9.80% |
03-28-2011, 01:10 PM
|
#1 (permalink)
|
NES Collector
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Millbury, MA
Posts: 94
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
|
Poll - Nuclear plant in your town
Pretty simple poll. Given whats going on with japan, I was wondering if people's opinion on nuclear power has changed. So if the government came to your town and wanted to put in a nuclear plant in your town would you support it, oppose it, or don't care.
__________________
"Would you like a jelly baby"
Miles Displaced By
Walking = 3.6
Last edited by echomodder; 03-28-2011 at 01:51 PM..
|
|
|
Today
|
|
|
Other popular topics in this forum...
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 01:18 PM
|
#2 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 1,300
Thanks: 315
Thanked 179 Times in 138 Posts
|
No way. And I had the same opinion before the failure in Japan.
__________________
I'm not coasting, I'm shifting slowly.
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 01:25 PM
|
#3 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Belgium
Posts: 4,683
Thanks: 178
Thanked 652 Times in 516 Posts
|
As the crow flies, I work 2.09 miles from a nuclear power plant with 4 reactors.
It hasn't really bothered me before, and it doesn't bother me now.
That doesn't mean I particularly like nuclear energy, but it'll have to do until we get something better and safer.
At the moment, we're a long shot away from that goal.
__________________
Strayed to the Dark Diesel Side
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 01:32 PM
|
#4 (permalink)
|
Coasting Down the Peak
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: M I C H I G A N
Posts: 514
Thanks: 27
Thanked 42 Times in 35 Posts
|
I live in a town with a reactor. I don't work there.
I feel that of all electric generation types, nuclear has the least impact on the environment.
I am concerned about operating the plant correctly, and dealing with spent fuel correctly, which I don't think is happening now.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to skyl4rk For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2011, 02:01 PM
|
#5 (permalink)
|
EcoModding Lurker
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Ohio
Posts: 12
Thanks: 1
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
I live a mile from a reactor and I have no problem, we have had some maitenence issues come up the last few years but it defenatly supports our community and has been a general positive.
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 02:14 PM
|
#6 (permalink)
|
Hypermiler
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Texas
Posts: 2,321
Thanks: 611
Thanked 434 Times in 284 Posts
|
Compared to my town's current option, one of the dirtiest coal plants in the country, nuclear sounds like a great thing to me.
__________________
11-mile commute: 100 mpg - - - Tank: 90.2 mpg / 1191 miles
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 02:40 PM
|
#7 (permalink)
|
n00b.... sortof..
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: SFL
Posts: 345
Thanks: 37
Thanked 19 Times in 18 Posts
|
I see nuclear power as a very viable option over coal burning plants.
granted, there are even better alternatives, but they arent very viable an option yet, so until they are, nuclear is fine for me.
__________________
~Mike
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to d0sitmatr For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2011, 03:06 PM
|
#8 (permalink)
|
The PRC.
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Elsewhere.
Posts: 5,304
Thanks: 285
Thanked 536 Times in 384 Posts
|
I used to produce software used inside a power station (not as part of the station itself but as part of long term monitoring). Used to visit a number of them quite often and have no problem at all.
When it comes to the Japan incident we have to remember the plant involved is in an earthquake zone, has been around for nearly 40 years (and has therefore survived quite a few quakes in the past) and in that time has no doubt contributed far more than it cost to the Japanese economy during the 70s-2000s.
__________________
[I]So long and thanks for all the fish.[/I]
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Arragonis For This Useful Post:
|
|
03-28-2011, 03:31 PM
|
#9 (permalink)
|
Master EcoModder
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Private
Posts: 282
Thanks: 2
Thanked 73 Times in 47 Posts
|
I think there should be more, small, community sized nuclear plants built. Something along the lines of those installed aboard submarines. Put the reactor housing below ground, and the only visible part would be the cooling tower and electrical grid.
|
|
|
03-28-2011, 04:29 PM
|
#10 (permalink)
|
Wannabe greenie
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Yorba Linda, CA
Posts: 1,098
Thanks: 5
Thanked 53 Times in 40 Posts
|
I answered "support" with the following caveats:
1. It needs to be a safer design than the old 50 year old designs we have now. Something self-regulating, like pebble bed.
2. We need to get the political clout together to actually create reprocessing plants. We have the technology to reprocess spent fuel over and over again until there's pretty much nothing left but a tiny bit of low-grade material that's much easier to dispose of (and much less of it!)
3. The NRC needs teeth to actually enforce safety, and Congress needs to leave them the hell alone.
Oh, and I want an RTG for my basement.
|
|
|
The Following User Says Thank You to Clev For This Useful Post:
|
|
|