Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > EcoModding Central
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 07-16-2015, 05:41 PM   #1 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Poor coasting: why?

Hi, one of my cars is an old 80s Ford Fiesta. It was never sold in the US, so here's a picture of one for reference:

This is a small B-segment car with a carbureted 1.1 liter 50 hp pushrod engine. It weighs in at 780 Kg and has a very poor .Cd of 0.40.

One of the things I never really understood completely is why this car coasts so poorly in neutral when compared to other cars I have owned or driven. It makes the car kind of uncomfortable for an hypermiler (i.e. it needs constant shifting)...

For example a Honda Jazz (Fit for you in the US) weighs only 980 Kg and coasts so much better.

The brakes aren't dragging. And the tires are 155/70 R13 Michelin Energy, hence eco-friendly... When I push it by hand it rolls easily.

Hypotheses:
- It's just too light to coast well.
- Ford uses very heavy gearbox oil when compared to Honda?
- Aerodynamics hurt it significantly even at slow speeds.
- All of the above combined?

I would like to hear from Metro owners for instance. They are light, I think. How well do they coast?

Is there any simple and cheap modification that would help the car coast better (it's an historic vehicle, I don't want to butcher it)? If I could make coast better it would become more comfortable and I would then drive it more...

Thanks!

__________________
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 07-16-2015, 05:46 PM   #2 (permalink)
Administrator
 
Daox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Germantown, WI
Posts: 11,203

CM400E - '81 Honda CM400E
90 day: 51.49 mpg (US)

Daox's Grey Prius - '04 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 49.53 mpg (US)

Daox's Insight - '00 Honda Insight
90 day: 64.33 mpg (US)

Swarthy - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage DE
Mitsubishi
90 day: 56.69 mpg (US)

Daox's Volt - '13 Chevrolet Volt
Thanks: 2,501
Thanked 2,585 Times in 1,553 Posts
This is one of the first thing I noticed in my Metro. It does NOT coast nearly as far as any other previous car I've owned, and I've had a few small Toyotas (Tercel and Paseo). The lightweight design combined with the less than stellar aerodynamics just makes it slow down a lot faster. I did notice that once I get to very low speeds (~15 mph) it coasts great...
__________________
Current project: A better alternator delete
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Daox For This Useful Post:
RPM (07-16-2015)
Old 07-16-2015, 05:53 PM   #3 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Thanks, it may be that it is just the nature of the beast + greater mechanical optimization from the Japanese companies.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-16-2015, 06:03 PM   #4 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,927
Thanks: 877
Thanked 2,024 Times in 1,304 Posts
Barring anything increasing the total drag, the issue is called sectional density. Less weight behind each square foot of frontal area, means the same aero total resistance has less inertia to push your car further when coasting.

regards
mech
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to user removed For This Useful Post:
oldtamiyaphile (07-16-2015)
Old 07-16-2015, 09:26 PM   #5 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Agreed: high Cd and low weight is a frustrating combination! The Metro is a poor high speed pulse and glide machine. But 0.40 is particularly high.

There are lots of 'stealth' aero mods that could be done. And yet others that aren't stealth, but could be easily reversible. Good news: those wheel covers look pretty good already.

Unfortunately, I suspect the hatch angle is a big part of the problem. Fixable, but not as a 'stealth' mod.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MetroMPG For This Useful Post:
RPM (07-17-2015)
Old 07-16-2015, 10:10 PM   #6 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 263

Winsight - '06 Honda Insight
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 72.19 mpg (US)
Thanks: 244
Thanked 86 Times in 61 Posts
I can't believe it's been almost five and a half years, but I posted about alignment affecting fuel economy. I bring it up because nobody has mentioned it yet.
http://ecomodder.com/forum/showthrea...car-12358.html

Quote:
Almost a 7.5% drop in setting from zero toe to 1/8" toe in just the front.
At 60mph!

Using the calculator here, rolling resistance with a driver on a first gen Insight is approximately 25% of total drag at sixty miles per hour. If I'm doing this right, that's an increase of rolling resistance of 30%.

What I'm getting at is that an older car with specs for toe in, possibly while being misaligned and maybe having worn parts could really wreck your coasting.

I agree with the other posts regarding high drag and low weight as well.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to fusion210 For This Useful Post:
MetroMPG (07-16-2015), RPM (07-17-2015)
Old 07-16-2015, 10:12 PM   #7 (permalink)
Batman Junior
 
MetroMPG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: 1000 Islands, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 22,513

Blackfly - '98 Geo Metro
Team Metro
Last 3: 70.09 mpg (US)

MPGiata - '90 Mazda Miata
90 day: 52.71 mpg (US)

Even Fancier Metro - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage top spec
90 day: 70.75 mpg (US)

Appliance car - '14 Mitsubishi Mirage ES (base)
90 day: 60.16 mpg (US)
Thanks: 4,058
Thanked 6,957 Times in 3,602 Posts
Great point about alignment.
__________________
Project MPGiata! Mods for getting 50+ MPG from a 1990 Miata
Honda mods: Ecomodding my $800 Honda Fit 5-speed beater
Mitsu mods: 70 MPG in my ecomodded, dirt cheap, 3-cylinder Mirage.
Ecodriving test: Manual vs. automatic transmission MPG showdown



EcoModder
has launched a forum for the efficient new Mitsubishi Mirage
www.MetroMPG.com - fuel efficiency info for Geo Metro owners
www.ForkenSwift.com - electric car conversion on a beer budget
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 12:33 AM   #8 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
oldtamiyaphile's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Australia
Posts: 1,510

UFI - '12 Fiat 500 Twinair
Team Turbocharged!
90 day: 40.3 mpg (US)

Jeep - '05 Jeep Wrangler Renegade
90 day: 18.09 mpg (US)

R32 - '89 Nissan Skyline

STiG - '16 Renault Trafic 140dCi Energy
90 day: 30.12 mpg (US)

Prius - '05 Toyota Prius
Team Toyota
90 day: 50.25 mpg (US)

Premodded - '49 Ford Freighter
90 day: 13.48 mpg (US)

F-117 - '10 Proton Arena GLSi
Pickups
Mitsubishi
90 day: 37.82 mpg (US)

Ralica - '85 Toyota Celica ST
90 day: 25.23 mpg (US)

Sx4 - '07 Suzuki Sx4
90 day: 32.21 mpg (US)

F-117 (2) - '03 Citroen Xsara VTS
90 day: 30.06 mpg (US)
Thanks: 325
Thanked 452 Times in 319 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Old Mechanic View Post
Barring anything increasing the total drag, the issue is called sectional density.
Thanks for the new term, I've been calling it aero density in my head (although I've been factoring in CD as well as frontal area)

Cars with poor 'aero density' are no fun to hypermile.

I actually prefer driving my Renault with the trailer attached. My CD goes from 0.33 to 0.45, but my weight goes up by 500kg. Although high speed glides are reduced, low speed (where I spend all my time) glides are improved. Sadly, it's still less efficient with the trailer.
__________________






  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 06:16 AM   #9 (permalink)
RPM
EcoModding Lurker
 
RPM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Portugal
Posts: 82

JF - '97 Honda Civic 1.5i LS VTEC (EK3)
Team Honda
90 day: 59.68 mpg (US)
Thanks: 37
Thanked 21 Times in 16 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by MetroMPG View Post
Agreed: high Cd and low weight is a frustrating combination! The Metro is a poor high speed pulse and glide machine. But 0.40 is particularly high.

There are lots of 'stealth' aero mods that could be done. And yet others that aren't stealth, but could be easily reversible. Good news: those wheel covers look pretty good already.

Unfortunately, I suspect the hatch angle is a big part of the problem. Fixable, but not as a 'stealth' mod.
I will look into making a belly pan. The car has absolutely no underbody protection, which I dislike because the engine gets dirty very quickly and I like to keep it detailed. So I could kill two birds with one stone. I am not much of a fabricator, must gather up courage.

The .Cd is high but the frontal area is small: the car is 1.3 meters tall and 1.585 m wide (thank God for small miracles ).

The air flow must detach at the top of the roof for sure. They even made the roof raise slightly at the edge to promote a cleaner separation.
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 07-17-2015, 08:43 AM   #10 (permalink)
Not bad for a machine
 
dirtydave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Baltimore
Posts: 1,024

Maechunbu - Retired - '00 Kia Sephia 1.8I4 16VDOHC
Last 3: 45.28 mpg (US)

Slasher - '96 Chevy Corsica 2.2L 3speedauto
Duct Tape Aero Crew
Team Chevy
90 day: 34.76 mpg (US)
Thanks: 279
Thanked 242 Times in 179 Posts
sweet ride!
I noticed this too with 4 people in my car vs 1 person

__________________




  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com