Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Success Stories
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 08-26-2019, 07:07 PM   #111 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: May 2019
Location: California
Posts: 121

Hyhoe - '08 Chevy Tahoe HY2
Thanks: 0
Thanked 18 Times in 18 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan jones View Post
I could'nt keep the return angle below 17 but well it's a short body, toyota's fault


...also the rivets are countersunk ready for respray, also there are sections underneath ready for a cutout and mounting holes, I'm letting the fibreglass and bondo settle for a week
how to change the tire??

  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 08-28-2019, 01:38 PM   #112 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: england
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
The benefits of Honda's approach (no gearbox at all) are that it's lighter, less expensive, and marginally more efficient when the engine is directly driving the wheels, since there are fewer gears.[/QUOTE]

Yes I agree but I couldn't get an insight at the time

Thanks for all the support folks
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan jones For This Useful Post:
TexasCotton (09-10-2019)
Old 08-28-2019, 01:44 PM   #113 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: england
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by mpg_numbers_guy View Post
I recently hooked up the Dr. Prius app to my mom's 08 Prius to see how the battery functions while driving. The car seems to strive to keep the battery between a 60% and 65% state of charge - indicated by 6/8 bars on the display. Any higher than 63% means that you have either gone downhill, or have driven inefficiently by braking a lot, so the car will use more battery to try to get your mpg back up. Any lower than 60% means that you've used a lot of EV range or a lot of battery power, so the car will burn more gas to get the charge back up, also reducing efficiency.

Improving aerodynamics and reducing weight won't make the battery stay at a higher charge - the 60%-65% is optimized for best battery life and efficiency. Reducing weight will help keep the battery at that charge state better, which will allow the car to get better fuel economy overall.

It's a myth that hybrids get better fuel economy - most of their efficiency is due to their aerodynamic shape and smaller engine. The electric system works mostly to offset inefficient driving patterns, such as braking.



The shorter wheels theoretically should give you shorter gearing, but I'm not entirely sure how the Prius CVT works - it may be completely load based and not have any kind of rubber band style gear ratios (i.e., min RPM for a given speed). It would be interesting to see speed vs MPH on level ground with the old wheels/tires versus the new wheels/tires - using RPM monitoring through Torque or a Scangauge, and a GPS speedometer.
Thanks for your time and reply, I'm just going by a feel of the car. To begin with the acceleration was ruthless but over a few days the engine came on less and has gone back to how it used to be, energy wise. If you race for for a while it has more reserve power even though the ice works as normal. However the whole car certainly drives better, holds better and is less buffeted by the wind, compared to stock.

I agree about efficiency, I used to get 60mpg from my exes Ibiza. Mine on a run and round town however is far better and has low tax. I reduced weight because most of my miles are urban rural and I stop start all the time. I do agree that for long consistent runs aerodynamics is utmost but for me I feel weight is

Last edited by Nathan jones; 08-28-2019 at 02:03 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Nathan jones For This Useful Post:
rob.e (11-18-2019), TexasCotton (09-10-2019)
Old 08-28-2019, 02:00 PM   #114 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,593

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 24.41 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 39.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,355
Thanked 1,490 Times in 944 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nathan jones View Post
The benefits of Honda's approach (no gearbox at all) are that it's lighter, less expensive, and marginally more efficient when the engine is directly driving the wheels, since there are fewer gears.
Yes I agree but I couldn't get an insight at the time

Thanks for all the support folks [/QUOTE]


This only applies to the most recent Hybrids, e.g. the 2013+ Accord, 2019 Insight and Clarity. The first gen Insight has a decidedly inferior system, and its saving grace is that it weighs like 600 kilos if stripped
  Reply With Quote
Old 08-28-2019, 02:06 PM   #115 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: england
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid View Post
how to change the tire??

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tahoe_Hybrid View Post
...also the rivets are countersunk ready for respray, also there are sections underneath ready for a cutout and mounting holes, I'm letting the fibreglass and bondo settle for a week
.
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan jones For This Useful Post:
TexasCotton (09-10-2019)
Old 09-10-2019, 01:54 AM   #116 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas Fort Worth
Posts: 208

TexasThunder - '08 Toyota Prius Base
Thanks: 178
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Front bumper cover

I one of your recent image posts you had a front modified bumper cover how did / is that working out ?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-13-2019, 09:57 PM   #117 (permalink)
EcoModding Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Phoenix, AZ area
Posts: 222
Thanks: 3
Thanked 106 Times in 75 Posts
Did I miss it, or was a weight ever posted?
__________________
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-28-2019, 08:48 AM   #118 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: england
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
The bumper is fine thanks, reduces frontal area the way I wanted. There aren't any other modifications aerodynamically apart from a floor skin. It passed the MOT again the other day and my guy says I can replace rear doors with CF so will do the wings and those next year
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan jones For This Useful Post:
TexasCotton (10-19-2019)
Old 09-28-2019, 09:15 AM   #119 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
Ecky's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Vermont
Posts: 3,593

Gaptooth (retired) - '00 Honda Insight
Team Honda
Gen-1 Insights
90 day: 54.26 mpg (US)

Such Fit - '07 Honda Fit Sport
90 day: 41.27 mpg (US)

Connect - '15 Ford Transit Connect XL
90 day: 24.41 mpg (US)

K-sight - '00 Honda K-sight
90 day: 39.47 mpg (US)
Thanks: 1,355
Thanked 1,490 Times in 944 Posts
Any interest in keeping a fuel log, so we can see the fruits of your modifications?
  Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2019, 02:11 PM   #120 (permalink)
EcoModding Lurker
 
Join Date: Dec 2018
Location: england
Posts: 85
Thanks: 2
Thanked 36 Times in 33 Posts
I will when I come back off holiday. Despite consistent results I can't overemphasize driving style function

  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Nathan jones For This Useful Post:
TexasCotton (10-19-2019)
Reply  Post New Thread


Thread Tools




Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2019, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com