Go Back   EcoModder Forum > EcoModding > Aerodynamics
Register Now
 Register Now
 

Reply  Post New Thread
 
Submit Tools LinkBack Thread Tools
Old 04-23-2014, 03:21 PM   #201 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by California98Civic View Post
The wheel well skirt clips can be made to hold tightly if you design them to allow for a bolt that can be used to tighten them only the wheel well lip. That's what I did, following I think a design by metro. I also was not satisfied with how far the poked out, and have since adjusted them with aditional clamps to pull them into a position more flush with the vehicle side. Thanks for all the write-up deets and the pics.
That design was my starting point. Not really sure which I like better or if there's a reason to prefer one or the other. Making space for the bolt makes me nervous about a collision between the tire and clamp hardware if you hit a bump and see a lot of suspension travel, but I guess no one has reported that issue.


Last edited by christofoo; 04-23-2014 at 03:43 PM..
  Reply With Quote
Alt Today
Popular topics

Other popular topics in this forum...

   
Old 04-23-2014, 03:42 PM   #202 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Kammback disaster

First off, our Southern Utah trip had great mileage - 48, 43, and 45 MPG, for a trip average of 45.6 MPG over 1111 miles. Not bad! This trip always has lower speeds than my other long-hauls, and a lot less air conditioning. The big question is whether the winds were favorable. The Arches/Moab/Hanksville area can be very windy, but there's a real shortage of wind-socks, so I usually don't have much idea what the balance of wind direction was. It's tempting to assume it always hurts more than helps because it's not a conservative force (unlike gravity), and in fact wind is very nonlinear (V^2 for aerodynamics), and even side-winds are expected to hurt.



=====================

The Kammback was destroyed at the beginning of the 3rd tank.



I'm really glad it didn't hit another vehicle or do any real damage to my vehicle. (I'm also really glad there were no witnesses, for the sake of my ego, and also really glad this is not the scenario where all our belongings get strewn across the road by a failed cargo box.)

On I-70 W I had a really horrible side-wind, I'm estimating it was well north of 30MPH steady, plus gusts. I saw there was a problem and I made two stops to attempt to strap it down. However, I thought that the only hazard was coming from the Kamm-to-box window section lifting off, so that's where I duct-taped. Right after the second stop, as I was accelerating, the side-wind got under the Kamm right-hand side-window and there was enough leverage to break the right-hand magnet loose. Once that happened I saw the whole structure break loose in the mirror and blow away - just like that. The hinge and aluminum brace holding the left hand magnet twisted and took a lot of damage when it was pried off.

These are beefed up magnets, they were strong enough I could open the trunk all the way and over-center the Kammback plus Kamm-to-box-window without any trouble. However, in order to accommodate the roofline curvature there was a hinge between the two magnet sections, so although it was a lot stronger against slide-off, it wasn't really stronger against a side-wind.

I made a snap decision to salvage some components (the camera, magnets, and trunk linkage), and leave the rest on the road side. I've had some thoughts about going back to retrieve what's left, but I'm not sure.

Lesson learned: this type of structure needs enough downward force at the trunk to secure it against side-winds. I didn't imagine this failure mode until I saw it happen. If I could also aerodynamically fish-scale the leading edges (EDIT- at the c-pillar) against a side-wind that would be really effective. I think I prefer attaching to the roof-rack mount channel rather than magnets, but neither is good enough unless the side-window is secure against lifting up in a side-wind. Correction: I'm pretty sure it's the lateral forces that caused it to break free. Enough lateral force from the right will cause the right-hand magnet to slide down the roof, then the curved roofline and turbulence on the side break the magnet's grip. One approach to correcting the problem is lateral tie-down webs hooked onto the trunk.

================

I also have some really interesting grille ducting I want to report. I have a real shortage of posting time.

Last edited by christofoo; 08-12-2014 at 02:00 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to christofoo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-23-2014), bespurcell (01-16-2015), Cd (12-27-2014), Jyden (04-24-2014), mikeyjd (05-14-2014), NachtRitter (04-23-2014), PaleMelanesian (04-24-2014), Piwoslaw (04-25-2014)
Old 04-23-2014, 06:37 PM   #203 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
aerohead's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Sanger,Texas,U.S.A.
Posts: 16,225
Thanks: 24,372
Thanked 7,357 Times in 4,757 Posts
disaster

Welcome to the Exploding Kamm-back Club.
It is a good thing that it didn't end any more awkward than it did.Now,thanks to your report,we have some important and critical DIY fabrication knowledge.That's a clear victory.
And your mpg is impressive.
I'd say,that we all came out ahead.
Thanks for soldiering on with the project,and sticking it out through all the warts and moles of it.
I've collected photos of the before 'explosive deconstruction' configuration and they'll be viewed by the North Texas Renewable Energy Group this May.
Thanks for all you've done and continue to do at the University of Hard Knocks.
__________________
Photobucket album: http://s1271.photobucket.com/albums/jj622/aerohead2/
  Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to aerohead For This Useful Post:
California98Civic (04-28-2014), christofoo (04-23-2014), mikeyjd (05-14-2014)
Old 04-23-2014, 08:36 PM   #204 (permalink)
NightKnight
 
NachtRitter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Placerville, CA
Posts: 1,595

Helga - '00 Volkswagen Jetta TDI
TEAM VW AUDI Group
Diesel
90 day: 51.85 mpg (US)

Mathilde - '99 Volkswagen Eurovan Camper
90 day: 16.87 mpg (US)
Thanks: 314
Thanked 314 Times in 187 Posts
Major bummer! Thanks for the update though!
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-23-2014, 11:11 PM   #205 (permalink)
Not Doug
 
Xist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Show Low, AZ
Posts: 12,230

Chorizo - '00 Honda Civic HX, baby! :D
90 day: 35.35 mpg (US)

Mid-Life Crisis Fighter - '99 Honda Accord LX
90 day: 34.2 mpg (US)

Gramps - '04 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 35.39 mpg (US)

Don't hit me bro - '05 Toyota Camry LE
90 day: 30.49 mpg (US)
Thanks: 7,254
Thanked 2,229 Times in 1,719 Posts
It is terrible that happened to you, but yes, it is very good that your Kamm-back did not damage anyone or anything, and I hope that you are able to engineer through that. You have done outstanding work so far.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-24-2014, 07:58 PM   #206 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,497
Thanks: 8,060
Thanked 8,860 Times in 7,314 Posts
Ouch! I've had that happen carrying hollow-core doors on a clip-on roof rack—twice. The load was lashed to the rack and the whole thing flew off. The 2nd time was right downtown @ 35-40mph, so I know about the embarrassment.

So what's the solution? Stronger hinges on the roof? Jeep hood clamps at the rear sides?
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 03:52 PM   #207 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Quote:
Originally Posted by aerohead View Post
Welcome to the Exploding Kamm-back Club.
It is a good thing that it didn't end any more awkward than it did.Now,thanks to your report,we have some important and critical DIY fabrication knowledge.That's a clear victory.
And your mpg is impressive.
I'd say,that we all came out ahead.
Thanks for soldiering on with the project,and sticking it out through all the warts and moles of it.
I've collected photos of the before 'explosive deconstruction' configuration and they'll be viewed by the North Texas Renewable Energy Group this May.
Thanks for all you've done and continue to do at the University of Hard Knocks.
I'd love to hear more about your NTREG presentation - are you a member? Have any TX policy-makers been attracted to the group? Any comments you get on the presentation would interest me. Naturally I have higher resolution photos if you want them, harass me about it and I'll zip them up and send them your way. I'm honored.

Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
Ouch! I've had that happen carrying hollow-core doors on a clip-on roof rack—twice. The load was lashed to the rack and the whole thing flew off. The 2nd time was right downtown @ 35-40mph, so I know about the embarrassment.

So what's the solution? Stronger hinges on the roof? Jeep hood clamps at the rear sides?
I was thinking about the solution on the drive back yesterday (... next post ...). Maybe I'll recycle the nylon coated hooks previously used to to strap the AHB to the trunk's front lip. Now I'll run a strap between the Kammback frame and the trunk's bottom lip. I might even have all that hardware lying around. Cruel irony - I was thinking about doing this during Kammback design, at some point I decided the Kammback's own weight was adequate, and it seemed like the hooks would have been a pain - they would drop off when slack - but really, it doesn't take that much extra effort to include a strap retainer somewhere to keep the hooks from falling when the strap is slack.

Last edited by christofoo; 04-28-2014 at 04:29 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to christofoo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (07-07-2022)
Old 04-28-2014, 04:21 PM   #208 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
christofoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 292

00C - '00 Toyota Corolla
90 day: 43.54 mpg (US)
Thanks: 147
Thanked 190 Times in 73 Posts
Yesterday's successfull Kamm-back rescue mission

My wife was thoughtful enough to write down a mile-marker. (Would have saved myself some walking if I'd just spent a second to record my GPS position in the first place.)

(I didn't think I would do this, for one thing I hate to blow almost 9 gallons on travel to recover an item intended to save some unknown quantity of gas, but later on I realized that a) I really like the shade in the back seat from the Kamm, at least for some angles, and b) 9 gal is actually not a large fraction of the gas that the modding kit as a whole (is supposed to) save in 1 year. So...)

It took a while, but I in fact found it and brought it back.

Road-side engineering: I've just un-bent and restored 1 of 2 of the anchor magnets here. I brought my drill and rivets, and 2 new hinges:

(By the way, the white car in the background is presumably doing 75MPH. Mind boggled by Galaxy S4 shutter speed, at least in broad daylight. 1/2000 of a second, or so?)

Addition of a tie-down strap makes this orders of magnitude more secure. I think the duct tape around the C-pillar edges is also a big deal. Plenty of duct tape in other places out of paranoia / aerodynamic-lust.

This got me home without a hitch, through some windy conditions that I think might have been as bad or worse than the conditions that broke it. So I just need to engineer this into something more usable (partially described above).

I saved one piece from the Kamm-to-AHB-window for kicks, but as you know that shattered. Actually I think it was made from PETG, and the black lid was pushing it past glass-transition temperature in sunlight and it had already become rather concave, and so was well on its way to self-destruction anyways.

Oh, and, I drove for mileage on this one. 54 MPG over 470 miles (estimated), probably centered at about 65 MPH. P&G / EOC as usual. This trip ends up with a lot of I-15 mileage on it, which me and my family have noticed has almost magical effects on MPG.

Last edited by christofoo; 04-28-2014 at 08:57 PM..
  Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to christofoo For This Useful Post:
aerohead (04-29-2014), bespurcell (01-16-2015), California98Civic (04-28-2014), Cd (12-27-2014), mikeyjd (05-14-2014), NachtRitter (04-28-2014), Piwoslaw (05-01-2014), Xist (04-28-2014)
Old 04-28-2014, 06:56 PM   #209 (permalink)
Aero Wannabe
 
COcyclist's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: NW Colo
Posts: 738

TDi - '04 VW Golf
TEAM VW AUDI Group
90 day: 52.55 mpg (US)
Thanks: 705
Thanked 219 Times in 170 Posts
I've been secretly hoping you would go back and retrieve the Kamm-back. Nine gallons is not much in the name of science and for the contribution to readers of this forum. I have learned from your successes and mistakes. Thank you for your efforts.
__________________
60 mpg hwy highest, 50+mpg lifetime
TDi=fast frugal fun
https://ecomodder.com/forum/showthre...tml#post621801


Quote:
Originally Posted by freebeard View Post
The power needed to push an object through a fluid increases as the cube of the velocity. Mechanical friction increases as the square, so increasing speed requires progressively more power.
  Reply With Quote
Old 04-28-2014, 09:41 PM   #210 (permalink)
Master EcoModder
 
freebeard's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: northwest of normal
Posts: 28,497
Thanks: 8,060
Thanked 8,860 Times in 7,314 Posts
I like the part where you just had to go home and get your tools to complete the trip.

  Reply With Quote
Reply  Post New Thread






Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions Inc.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.5.2
All content copyright EcoModder.com